Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Consensus Conference on North American Training in Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery: A Review of the Conference and Presentation of Consensus Statements

Authors: D. Rohan Jeyarajah, MD, Russell S. Berman, MD, Majella Doyle, MD, Sunil K. Geevarghese, MD, Mitchell C. Posner, MD, Douglas Farmer, MD, Rebecca M. Minter, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The findings and recommendations of the North American Consensus Conference on Training in HPB Surgery held October 2014 are presented. The conference was hosted by the Society for Surgical Oncology (SSO), Americas Hepatopancreaticobiliary Association (AHPBA), and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS). The current state of training in HPB surgery in North America was defined through three pathways—HPB, Surgical Oncology, and Solid Organ Transplant fellowships. Consensus regarding programmatic requirements included establishment of minimum case volumes and inclusion of quality metrics. Formative assessment, using milestones as a framework and inclusive of both operative and non-operative skills, must be present. Specific core HPB cases should be defined and used for evaluation of operative skills. The conference concluded with a focus on the optimal means to perform summative assessment to evaluate the individual fellow completing a fellowship in HPB surgery. Presentations from the hospital perspective and the American Board of Surgery led to consensus that summative assessment was desired by the public and the hospital systems, and should occur in a uniform but possibly modular manner for all HPB fellowship pathways. A task force comprised of representatives of the SSO, AHPBA, and ASTS are charged with implementation of the consensus statements emanating from this consensus conference.
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of Transplantation, the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, and the Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission by The American Society of Transplantation, the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, or the Society of Surgical Oncology.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Daphne J, Warren-Forward H. Research methods for formal consensus development. Nurse Res. 2015;22(3):35–40.CrossRef Daphne J, Warren-Forward H. Research methods for formal consensus development. Nurse Res. 2015;22(3):35–40.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tseng JF, Pisters P, Lee JF, et al. Learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2007;141(5):694–701 Tseng JF, Pisters P, Lee JF, et al. Learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2007;141(5):694–701
5.
go back to reference Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, et al. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience and surgeon volume of patient outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single—institution experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145(7):634–40.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, et al. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience and surgeon volume of patient outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single—institution experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145(7):634–40.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Minter RM, Alseidi A, Jeyarajah DR, Hong JC, Greig PD, Dixon E Thumma JR, Pawlik TM. Training in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery: assessment of the hepatopancreaticobiliary workforce in North America. Ann Surg. 2015 (E Pub). Minter RM, Alseidi A, Jeyarajah DR, Hong JC, Greig PD, Dixon E Thumma JR, Pawlik TM. Training in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery: assessment of the hepatopancreaticobiliary workforce in North America. Ann Surg. 2015 (E Pub).
8.
go back to reference Hanna EM, Rozario N, Rupp S, et al. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: lessons learned and predictors for conversion. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9(2):152–9. Hanna EM, Rozario N, Rupp S, et al. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: lessons learned and predictors for conversion. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9(2):152–9.
9.
go back to reference Zureikat AH, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ. The utility of the robot in pancreatic resections. Adv Surg. 2014;48:77–95.CrossRefPubMed Zureikat AH, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ. The utility of the robot in pancreatic resections. Adv Surg. 2014;48:77–95.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ali JM. Getting lost in translation? Workplace based assessments in surgical training. Surgeon. 2013;11(5):286–9.CrossRefPubMed Ali JM. Getting lost in translation? Workplace based assessments in surgical training. Surgeon. 2013;11(5):286–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, Potts JR, Valentine RJ. The general surgery milestones project. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(5):1056–62CrossRefPubMed Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, Potts JR, Valentine RJ. The general surgery milestones project. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(5):1056–62CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Torbeck L, Williams RG, Choi J, Schitz CC, Chipman JG, Dunnington GL. How much guidance is given in the operating room? Factors influencing faculty self-repotrs, resident perceptions, and faculty/resident agreement. Surgery. 2014;156(4):797–803CrossRefPubMed Torbeck L, Williams RG, Choi J, Schitz CC, Chipman JG, Dunnington GL. How much guidance is given in the operating room? Factors influencing faculty self-repotrs, resident perceptions, and faculty/resident agreement. Surgery. 2014;156(4):797–803CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Williams RG, Verhulst S, Colliver JA, Sanfey H, Chen X, Dunnington GL. A template for reliable assessment of resident operative performance: assessment intervals, number of cases and raters. Surgery. 2012;152(4):517–24 Williams RG, Verhulst S, Colliver JA, Sanfey H, Chen X, Dunnington GL. A template for reliable assessment of resident operative performance: assessment intervals, number of cases and raters. Surgery. 2012;152(4):517–24
15.
go back to reference Zilbert NR, Murnaghan ML, Gallinger S, Regehr G, Moutlon CA. Taking a chance or playing it safe: reframing risk assessment within the surgeon’s comfort zone. Ann Surg. 2015;2626(2):253–9 Zilbert NR, Murnaghan ML, Gallinger S, Regehr G, Moutlon CA. Taking a chance or playing it safe: reframing risk assessment within the surgeon’s comfort zone. Ann Surg. 2015;2626(2):253–9
16.
go back to reference Mutabdzic D, Regehr G, Moulton CA. Coaching surgeons: is culture limiting our ability to improve? Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):213–6CrossRefPubMed Mutabdzic D, Regehr G, Moulton CA. Coaching surgeons: is culture limiting our ability to improve? Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):213–6CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pradarelli JC, Campbell DA, Dimick JB. Hospital credentialing and privileging of surgeons: a potential safety blind spot. JAMA. 2015;313(13):1313–4.CrossRefPubMed Pradarelli JC, Campbell DA, Dimick JB. Hospital credentialing and privileging of surgeons: a potential safety blind spot. JAMA. 2015;313(13):1313–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Consensus Conference on North American Training in Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery: A Review of the Conference and Presentation of Consensus Statements
Authors
D. Rohan Jeyarajah, MD
Russell S. Berman, MD
Majella Doyle, MD
Sunil K. Geevarghese, MD
Mitchell C. Posner, MD
Douglas Farmer, MD
Rebecca M. Minter, MD
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5111-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2016 Go to the issue