Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2016

01-01-2016 | Gynecologic Oncology

Survival of Patients with Uterine Carcinosarcoma Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping

Authors: Maria B. Schiavone, MD, Oliver Zivanovic, MD, PhD, Qin Zhou, MA, Mario M. Leitao Jr., MD, Douglas A. Levine, MD, Robert A. Soslow, MD, Kaled M. Alektiar, MD, Vicky Makker, MD, Alexia Iasonos, PhD, Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the outcome of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma undergoing sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping.

Methods

A prospectively maintained database was reviewed for all women with uterine cancer treated at our institution from January 1, 1998 to August 31, 2014. Patients were grouped based on whether they had undergone SLN mapping or routine lymphadenectomy at the time of staging. SLN evaluation was performed according to a standard institutional protocol that incorporates a surgical algorithm and pathologic ultrastaging.

Results

We identified 136 patients with uterine carcinosarcoma who had undergone lymph node evaluation; 48 had surgical staging with SLN mapping and 88 had routine lymphadenectomy consisting of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node dissection. Stage distribution for the SLN group included: stage I, 31 (65 %); stage II, 1 (2 %); stage III, 11 (23 %); stage IV, 5 (10 %). Stage distribution for the non-SLN group included: stage I, 48 (55 %); stage II, 4 (4 %); stage III, 19 (22 %); stage IV, 17 (19 %) (p = 0.4). Median number of lymph nodes removed was 8 and 20, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Median number of positive nodes was similar between the groups (p = 0.2). Of the 67 patients who had a documented recurrence, 14 of 20 (70 %) in the SLN and 34 of 47 (74 %) in the non-SLN group demonstrated a distant/multifocal pattern of recurrence. There was no difference in median progression-free survival between the groups (23 vs. 23.2 months, respectively; p = 0.7).

Conclusions

Progression-free survival in women with uterine carcinosarcoma undergoing SLN mapping with adjuvant therapy appears similar to that of patients treated before the incorporation of the SLN protocol. Additional prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to validate these early results.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Desai NB, Kollmeier MA, Makker V, Levine DA, Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar KM. Comparison of outcomes in early stage uterine carcinosarcoma and uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135:49–53.PubMedCrossRef Desai NB, Kollmeier MA, Makker V, Levine DA, Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar KM. Comparison of outcomes in early stage uterine carcinosarcoma and uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135:49–53.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rovirosa A, Ascaso C, Arenas M, et al. Pathologic prognostic factors in stage I-III uterine carcinosarcoma treated with postoperative radiotherapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290:329–34.PubMed Rovirosa A, Ascaso C, Arenas M, et al. Pathologic prognostic factors in stage I-III uterine carcinosarcoma treated with postoperative radiotherapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290:329–34.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Major FJ, Blessing JA, Silverberg SG, et al. Prognostic factors in early-stage uterine sarcoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 1993; 71:1702–9.PubMedCrossRef Major FJ, Blessing JA, Silverberg SG, et al. Prognostic factors in early-stage uterine sarcoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 1993; 71:1702–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yamada SD, Burger RA, Brewster WR, Anton D, Kohler MF, Monk BJ. Pathologic variables and adjuvant therapy as predictors of recurrence and survival for patients with surgically evaluated carcinosarcoma of the uterus. Cancer. 2000;88:2782–6.PubMedCrossRef Yamada SD, Burger RA, Brewster WR, Anton D, Kohler MF, Monk BJ. Pathologic variables and adjuvant therapy as predictors of recurrence and survival for patients with surgically evaluated carcinosarcoma of the uterus. Cancer. 2000;88:2782–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rovirosa A, Ascaso C, Ordi J, et al. Is vascular and lymphatic space invasion a main prognostic factor in uterine neoplasms with a sarcomatous component? A retrospective study of prognostic factors of 60 patients stratified by stages. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:1320–9.PubMedCrossRef Rovirosa A, Ascaso C, Ordi J, et al. Is vascular and lymphatic space invasion a main prognostic factor in uterine neoplasms with a sarcomatous component? A retrospective study of prognostic factors of 60 patients stratified by stages. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:1320–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rovirosa A, Ascaso C, Ordi J, et al. How to deal with prognostic factors and radiotherapy results in uterine neoplasms with a sarcomatous component? Clin Transl Oncol. 2009;11:681–7.PubMedCrossRef Rovirosa A, Ascaso C, Ordi J, et al. How to deal with prognostic factors and radiotherapy results in uterine neoplasms with a sarcomatous component? Clin Transl Oncol. 2009;11:681–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Arend R, Doneza JA, Wright JD. Uterine carcinosarcoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011;23:531–6.PubMed Arend R, Doneza JA, Wright JD. Uterine carcinosarcoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011;23:531–6.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Abu-Rustum NR. Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: a modern approach to surgical staging. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12:288–97.PubMed Abu-Rustum NR. Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: a modern approach to surgical staging. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12:288–97.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Abu-Rustum NR, Gomez JD, Alektiar KM, et al. The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:236–8.PubMedCrossRef Abu-Rustum NR, Gomez JD, Alektiar KM, et al. The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:236–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Soliman PT, Frumovitz M, Spannuth W, et al. Lymphadenectomy during endometrial cancer staging: practice patterns among gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119:291–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Soliman PT, Frumovitz M, Spannuth W, et al. Lymphadenectomy during endometrial cancer staging: practice patterns among gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119:291–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Barlin JN, Khoury-Collado F, Kim CH, et al. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:531–5.PubMedCrossRef Barlin JN, Khoury-Collado F, Kim CH, et al. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:531–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Khoury-Collado F, Glaser GE, Zivanovic O, et al. Improving sentinel lymph node detection rates in endometrial cancer: how many cases are needed? Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:453–5.PubMedCrossRef Khoury-Collado F, Glaser GE, Zivanovic O, et al. Improving sentinel lymph node detection rates in endometrial cancer: how many cases are needed? Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:453–5.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Abu-Rustum NR, Khoury-Collado F, Pandit-Taskar N, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping for grade 1 endometrial cancer: is it the answer to the surgical staging dilemma? Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:163–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Abu-Rustum NR, Khoury-Collado F, Pandit-Taskar N, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping for grade 1 endometrial cancer: is it the answer to the surgical staging dilemma? Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:163–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Leitao MM Jr, Khoury-Collado F, Gardner G, et al. Impact of incorporating an algorithm that utilizes sentinel lymph node mapping during minimally invasive procedures on the detection of stage IIIC endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129:38–41.PubMedCrossRef Leitao MM Jr, Khoury-Collado F, Gardner G, et al. Impact of incorporating an algorithm that utilizes sentinel lymph node mapping during minimally invasive procedures on the detection of stage IIIC endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129:38–41.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jewell EL, Huang JJ, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in minimally invasive surgery using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging for uterine and cervical malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133:274–7.PubMedCrossRef Jewell EL, Huang JJ, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in minimally invasive surgery using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging for uterine and cervical malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133:274–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Khoury-Collado F, Murray MP, Hensley ML, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer improves the detection of metastatic disease to regional lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122:251–4.PubMedCrossRef Khoury-Collado F, Murray MP, Hensley ML, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer improves the detection of metastatic disease to regional lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122:251–4.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nemani D, Mitra N, Guo M, Lin L. Assessing the effects of lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a SEER analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:82–8.PubMedCrossRef Nemani D, Mitra N, Guo M, Lin L. Assessing the effects of lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a SEER analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:82–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Naoura I, Canlorbe G, Bendifallah S, Ballester M, Darai E. Relevance of sentinel lymph node procedure for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136:60–4.PubMedCrossRef Naoura I, Canlorbe G, Bendifallah S, Ballester M, Darai E. Relevance of sentinel lymph node procedure for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136:60–4.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1707–16.PubMedCrossRef Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1707–16.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference ASTEC study group, Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, Amos C, Parmar MK. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet. 2009;373:125–36.CrossRef ASTEC study group, Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, Amos C, Parmar MK. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet. 2009;373:125–36.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Reed NS, Mangioni C, Malmstrom H, et al. Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874). Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:808–18.PubMedCrossRef Reed NS, Mangioni C, Malmstrom H, et al. Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874). Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:808–18.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Makker V, Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar KM, et al. A retrospective assessment of outcomes of chemotherapy-based versus radiation-only adjuvant treatment for completely resected stage I-IV uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:249–54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Makker V, Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar KM, et al. A retrospective assessment of outcomes of chemotherapy-based versus radiation-only adjuvant treatment for completely resected stage I-IV uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:249–54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cantrell LA, Havrilesky L, Moore DT, et al. A multi-institutional cohort study of adjuvant therapy in stage I-II uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127:22–6.PubMedCrossRef Cantrell LA, Havrilesky L, Moore DT, et al. A multi-institutional cohort study of adjuvant therapy in stage I-II uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127:22–6.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar K, Iasonos A, et al. The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:714–8.PubMedCrossRef Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar K, Iasonos A, et al. The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:714–8.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, Watari H, Takeda M, Sakuragi N. Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:1165–72.PubMedCrossRef Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, Watari H, Takeda M, Sakuragi N. Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:1165–72.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Survival of Patients with Uterine Carcinosarcoma Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping
Authors
Maria B. Schiavone, MD
Oliver Zivanovic, MD, PhD
Qin Zhou, MA
Mario M. Leitao Jr., MD
Douglas A. Levine, MD
Robert A. Soslow, MD
Kaled M. Alektiar, MD
Vicky Makker, MD
Alexia Iasonos, PhD
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum, MD
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4612-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2016 Go to the issue