Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Reconstructive Oncology

Introducing the SKIN Score: A Validated Scoring System to Assess Severity of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis

Authors: Valerie Lemaine, MD, MPH, Tanya L. Hoskin, MS, David R. Farley, MD, Clive S. Grant, MD, Judy C. Boughey, MD, Tiffany A. Torstenson, DO, Steven R. Jacobson, MD, James W. Jakub, MD, Amy C. Degnim, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With increasing use of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) is a clinical problem that deserves further study. We propose a validated scoring system to discriminate MSFN severity and standardize its assessment.

Methods

Women who underwent skin-sparing (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and IBR from November 2009 to October 2010 were studied retrospectively. A workgroup of breast and plastic surgeons scored postoperative photographs using the skin ischemia necrosis (SKIN) score to assess depth and surface area of MSFN. We evaluated correlation of the SKIN score with reoperation for MSFN and its reproducibility in an external sample of surgeons.

Results

We identified 106 subjects (175 operated breasts: 103 SSM, 72 NSM) who had ≥1 postoperative photograph within 60 days. SKIN scores correlated strongly with need for reoperation for MSFN, with an AUC of 0.96 for SSM and 0.89 for NSM. External scores agreed well with the gold standard scores for the breast mound photographs with weighted kappa values of 0.82 (depth), 0.56 (surface area), and 0.79 (composite score). The agreement was similar for the nipple-areolar complex photographs: 0.75 (depth), 0.63 (surface area), and 0.79 (composite score).

Conclusions

A simple scoring system to assess the severity of MSFN is proposed, incorporating both depth and surface area of MSFN. The SKIN score correlates strongly with the need for reoperation to manage MSFN and is reproducible among breast and plastic surgeons.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Tadjalli HE, Singletary SE, Ames FC. Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:193–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:49–62.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Foster RD, Esserman LJ, Anthony JP, Hwang ES, Do H. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study for the treatment of advanced stages of breast carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:462–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Chen CM, Disa JJ, Sacchini V, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1772–80.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros ACSD, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704–14.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, et al. The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:901e–8e.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Antony AK, Mehrara BM, McCarthy CM, et al. Salvage of tissue expander in the setting of mastectomy flap necrosis: a 13-year experience using timed excision with continued expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:356–63.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
Kagan RJ, Peck MD, Ahrenholz DH, et al. Surgical management of the burn wound and use of skin substitutes: an expert panel white paper. J Burn Care Res. 2013;34:e60–79.PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Maricevich R, Park J, Brander C. Mastectomy skin necrosis following mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Rev Bras Cir Plast. 2011;26(suppl):67.
13.
Goodwin SJ, McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, et al. Complications in smokers after postmastectomy tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:16–9; discussion 19–20.
14.
Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, Henry-Tillman RS, Westbrook K, Klimberg VS. Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:907–12.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26–32.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody Iii HS, 3rd, Disa JJ, Cordeiro P, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J. 2009;15:440–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Komorowski AL, Zanini V, Regolo L, Carolei A, Wysocki WM, Costa A. Necrotic complications after nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy. World J Surg. 2006;30:1410–3.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Li FC, Jiang HC, Li J. Immediate breast reconstruction with implants after skin-sparing mastectomy: a report of 96 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34:705–10.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Hultman CS, Daiza S. Skin-sparing mastectomy flap complications after breast reconstruction: review of incidence, management, and outcome. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:249–55; discussion 255.
20.
Radovanovic Z, Radovanovic D, Golubovic A, Ivkovic-Kapicl T, Bokorov B, Mandic A.. Early complications after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis: results of 214 procedures. Scand J Surg. 2010;99:115–8.PubMed
21.
Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Use of tumescent mastectomy technique as a risk factor for native breast skin flap necrosis following immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2011;201:160–5.PubMedCrossRef
22.
le Roux CM, Pan WR, Matousek SA, Ashton MW. Preventing venous congestion of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomical guide to preserving essential venous drainage networks. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1073–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
Phillips BT, Lanier ST, Conkling N, et al. Intraoperative perfusion techniques can accurately predict mastectomy skin flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: results of a prospective trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:778e–88e.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Moyer HR, Losken A. Predicting mastectomy skin flap necrosis with indocyanine green angiography: the gray area defined. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1043–8.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Munabi NC, Olorunnipa OB, Goltsman D, Rohde CH, Ascherman JA. The ability of intra-operative perfusion mapping with laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography to predict mastectomy flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: a prospective trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:449–55.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Duggal CS, Madni T, Losken A. An outcome analysis of intraoperative angiography for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Surg J. 2014;34:61–5.CrossRef
28.
Davies K, Allan L, Roblin P, Ross D, Farhadi J. Factors affecting post-operative complications following skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Breast. 2011;20:21–5.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Algaithy ZK, Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:125-9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Platt AJ, Mohan D, Baguley P. The effect of body mass index and wound irrigation on outcome after bilateral breast reduction. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51:552–5.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Patel KM, Hill LM, Gatti ME, Nahabedian MY. Management of massive mastectomy skin flap necrosis following autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:139–44.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Santanelli F, Longo B, Sorotos M, Farcomeni A, Paolini G. Flap survival of skin-sparing mastectomy type IV: a retrospective cohort study of 75 consecutive cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:981–9.PubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
Fan Z, He J. Preventing necrosis of the skin flaps with nitroglycerin after radical resection for breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1993;53:210.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Rohrich RJ, Cherry GW, Spira M. Enhancement of skin-flap survival using nitroglycerin ointment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73:943–8.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Celen O, Yildirim E, Berberoglu U. Prevention of wound edge necrosis by local application of dimethylsulfoxide. Acta Chir Belg. 2005;105:287–90.PubMed
37.
Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106–10; discussion 1110.
38.
Brandstetter M, Schoeller T, Pulzl P, Schubert H, Wechselberger G. Capsular flap for coverage of an exposed implant after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1388–90.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Mermans JF, Tuinder S, von Meyenfeldt MF, van der Hulst RR. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment for skin flap necrosis after a mastectomy: a case study. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2012;39:719–23.PubMed
40.
Hongying W, Zhang CS, Thakur B. Origin and countermeasure for common skin flap complications after radical operation for breast cancer. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2006;4:14–7.PubMed
41.
Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;96:47–51.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Introducing the SKIN Score: A Validated Scoring System to Assess Severity of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis
Authors
Valerie Lemaine, MD, MPH
Tanya L. Hoskin, MS
David R. Farley, MD
Clive S. Grant, MD
Judy C. Boughey, MD
Tiffany A. Torstenson, DO
Steven R. Jacobson, MD
James W. Jakub, MD
Amy C. Degnim, MD
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4409-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2015 Go to the issue

Breast Oncology

Reappraisal of Conventional Risk Stratification for Local Recurrence Based on Clinical Outcomes in 285 Resected Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast

Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Local Control in Ewing Sarcoma of the Chest Wall: Results of the EURO-EWING 99 Trial

Hepatobiliary Tumors

A Novel Therapeutic Combination Sequentially Targeting Aurora B and Bcl-xL in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatobiliary Tumors

Intra-arterial Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Combined with Systemic Chemotherapy is a Promising Method for Downstaging Unresectable Huge Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma to Surgical Treatment

Hepatobiliary Tumors

TREM-1, an Inflammatory Modulator, is Expressed in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells and Significantly Promotes Tumor Progression

Gastrointestinal Oncology

Impact of Periodic Endoscopy on Incidentally Diagnosed Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Findings in Surgically Resected and Confirmed Lesions