Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2015

01-07-2015 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Is Hepatic Resection for Large or Multifocal Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Justified? Results from a Multi-Institutional Collaboration

Authors: Gaya Spolverato, MD, Yuhree Kim, MD, MPH, Sorin Alexandrescu, MD, Irinel Popescu, MD, Hugo P. Marques, MD, Luca Aldrighetti, MD, T. Clark Gamblin, MD, John Miura, MD, Shishir K. Maithel, MD, Malcolm H. Squires, MD, Carlo Pulitano, MD, Charbel Sandroussi, MD, Gilles Mentha, MD, Todd W. Bauer, MD, Timothy Newhook, MD, Feng Shen, MD, George A. Poultsides, MD, J. Wallis Marsh, MD, Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The role of surgical resection for patients with large or multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains unclear. This study evaluated the long-term outcome of patients who underwent hepatic resection for large (≥7 cm) or multifocal (≥2) ICC.

Methods

Between 1990 and 2013, 557 patients who underwent liver resection for ICC were identified from a multi-institutional database. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative details, and long-term survival data were evaluated.

Results

Of the 557 patients, 215 (38.6 %) had a small, solitary ICC (group A) and 342 (61.4 %) had a large or multifocal ICC (group B). The patients in group B underwent an extended hepatectomy more frequently (16.9 vs. 30.4 %; P < 0.001). At the final pathology exam, the patients in group B were more likely to show evidence of vascular invasion (22.5 vs. 38.5 %), direct invasion of contiguous organs (6.5 vs. 12.9 %), and nodal metastasis (13.3 vs. 21.0 %) (all P < 0.05). Interestingly, the incidences of postoperative complications (39.3 vs. 46.8 %) and hospital mortality (1.1 vs. 3.7 %) were similar between the two groups (both P > 0.05). The group A patients had better rates for 5-year overall survival (OS) (30.5 vs. 18.7 %; P < 0.05) and disease-free survival (DFS) (22.6 vs. 8.2 %; P < 0.05) than the group B patients. For the patients in group B, the factors associated with a worse OS included more than three tumor nodules [hazard ratio (HR), 1.56], nodal metastasis (HR, 1.47), and poor differentiation (HR, 1.48).

Conclusions

Liver resection can be performed safely for patients with large or multifocal ICC. The long-term outcome for these patients can be stratified on the basis of a prognostic score that includes tumor number, nodal metastasis, and poor differentiation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bektas H, Schrem H, Kleine M, et al. Primary liver tumours: presentation, diagnosis and surgical treatment. InTech. 2013; 91–116. Bektas H, Schrem H, Kleine M, et al. Primary liver tumours: presentation, diagnosis and surgical treatment. InTech. 2013; 91–116.
2.
go back to reference Aljiffry M, Abdulelah A, Walsh M, Peltekian K, Alwayn I, Molinari M. Evidence-based approach to cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:134–147.PubMedCrossRef Aljiffry M, Abdulelah A, Walsh M, Peltekian K, Alwayn I, Molinari M. Evidence-based approach to cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:134–147.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Patel T. Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology. 2001;33:1353–1357.PubMedCrossRef Patel T. Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology. 2001;33:1353–1357.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shaib YH, Davila JA, McGlynn K, El-Serag HB. Rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a true increase? J Hepatol. 2004;40:472–477.PubMedCrossRef Shaib YH, Davila JA, McGlynn K, El-Serag HB. Rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a true increase? J Hepatol. 2004;40:472–477.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Morimoto Y, Tanaka Y, Ito T, et al. Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg. 2003;10:432–440.CrossRef Morimoto Y, Tanaka Y, Ito T, et al. Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg. 2003;10:432–440.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Konstadoulakis MM, Roayaie S, Gomatos IP, et al. Fifteen-year, single-center experience with the surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: operative results and long-term outcome. Surgery. 2008;143:366–374.PubMedCrossRef Konstadoulakis MM, Roayaie S, Gomatos IP, et al. Fifteen-year, single-center experience with the surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: operative results and long-term outcome. Surgery. 2008;143:366–374.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Choi S-B, Kim K-S, Choi J-Y, et al. The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3048–3056.PubMedCrossRef Choi S-B, Kim K-S, Choi J-Y, et al. The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3048–3056.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Dickie LA, Kleiner DE. Hepatocellular carcinoma confirmation, treatment, and survival in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registries, 1992–2008. Hepatology. 2012;55:476–482.PubMedCrossRef Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Dickie LA, Kleiner DE. Hepatocellular carcinoma confirmation, treatment, and survival in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registries, 1992–2008. Hepatology. 2012;55:476–482.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nathan H, Segev DL, Mayo SC, et al. National trends in surgical procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma: 1998–2008. Cancer. 2012;118:1838–1844.PubMedCrossRef Nathan H, Segev DL, Mayo SC, et al. National trends in surgical procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma: 1998–2008. Cancer. 2012;118:1838–1844.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cance WG, Stewart AK, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base Report on treatment patterns for hepatocellular carcinomas: improved survival of surgically resected patients, 1985–1996. Cancer. 2000;88:912–920.PubMedCrossRef Cance WG, Stewart AK, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base Report on treatment patterns for hepatocellular carcinomas: improved survival of surgically resected patients, 1985–1996. Cancer. 2000;88:912–920.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dodson RM, Weiss MJ, Cosgrove D, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: management options and emerging therapies. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:736–750, e734. Dodson RM, Weiss MJ, Cosgrove D, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: management options and emerging therapies. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:736–750, e734.
13.
go back to reference Hyder O, Marques H, Pulitano C, et al. A nomogram to predict long-term survival after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an Eastern and Western experience. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149(5):432–438.PubMedCrossRef Hyder O, Marques H, Pulitano C, et al. A nomogram to predict long-term survival after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an Eastern and Western experience. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149(5):432–438.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Edge SB, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. Springer: New York; 2010. p.143–164 Edge SB, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. Springer: New York; 2010. p.143–164
15.
go back to reference Pawlik TM, Delman KA, Vauthey JN, et al. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade: implications for selection of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:1086–1092.PubMedCrossRef Pawlik TM, Delman KA, Vauthey JN, et al. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade: implications for selection of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:1086–1092.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nathan H, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, et al. A proposed staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:14–22.PubMedCrossRef Nathan H, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, et al. A proposed staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:14–22.PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3140–3145.PubMedCrossRef de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3140–3145.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Raderer M, Hejna MH, Valencak JB, et al. Two consecutive phase II studies of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/mitomycin C and of gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary cancer. Oncology. 1999;56:177–180.PubMedCrossRef Raderer M, Hejna MH, Valencak JB, et al. Two consecutive phase II studies of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/mitomycin C and of gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary cancer. Oncology. 1999;56:177–180.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kubicka S, Rudolph KL, Tietze MK, Lorenz M, Manns M. Phase II study of systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy for advanced unresectable hepatobiliary carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:783–789.PubMed Kubicka S, Rudolph KL, Tietze MK, Lorenz M, Manns M. Phase II study of systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy for advanced unresectable hepatobiliary carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:783–789.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, et al. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade among patients undergoing resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1284–1291.PubMedCrossRef Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, et al. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade among patients undergoing resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1284–1291.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ng KK, Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, et al. Is hepatic resection for large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma justified? Results from a multi-institutional database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:364–373.PubMedCrossRef Ng KK, Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, et al. Is hepatic resection for large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma justified? Results from a multi-institutional database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:364–373.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Hyder O, Marsh JW, Salem R, et al. Intra-arterial therapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3779–3786.PubMedCrossRef Hyder O, Marsh JW, Salem R, et al. Intra-arterial therapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3779–3786.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is Hepatic Resection for Large or Multifocal Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Justified? Results from a Multi-Institutional Collaboration
Authors
Gaya Spolverato, MD
Yuhree Kim, MD, MPH
Sorin Alexandrescu, MD
Irinel Popescu, MD
Hugo P. Marques, MD
Luca Aldrighetti, MD
T. Clark Gamblin, MD
John Miura, MD
Shishir K. Maithel, MD
Malcolm H. Squires, MD
Carlo Pulitano, MD
Charbel Sandroussi, MD
Gilles Mentha, MD
Todd W. Bauer, MD
Timothy Newhook, MD
Feng Shen, MD
George A. Poultsides, MD
J. Wallis Marsh, MD
Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4223-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2015 Go to the issue