Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2013

01-11-2013 | Pancreatic Tumors

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and S-1 for Resectable and Borderline Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Results from a Prospective Multi-institutional Phase 2 Trial

Authors: Fuyuhiko Motoi, MD, Kazuyuki Ishida, MD, Fumiyoshi Fujishima, MD, Shigeru Ottomo, MD, Masaya Oikawa, MD, Takaho Okada, MD, Hiromune Shimamura, MD, Shinichi Takemura, MD, Fuminori Ono, MD, Masanori Akada, MD, Kei Nakagawa, MD, Yu Katayose, MD, Shinichi Egawa, MD, Michiaki Unno, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgical resection is the only curative strategy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but recurrence rates are high even after purported curative resection. First-line treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) is associated with promising antitumor activity with a high response rate. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of GS in the neoadjuvant setting.

Methods

In a multi-institutional single-arm phase 2 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with gemcitabine and S-1, repeated every 21 days, was administered for two cycles (NAC-GS) to patients with resectable and borderline PDAC. The primary end point was the 2-year survival rate. Secondary end points were feasibility, resection rate, pathological effect, recurrence-free survival, and tumor marker status.

Results

Of 36 patients enrolled, 35 were eligible for this clinical trial conducted between 2008 and 2010. The most common toxicity was neutropenia in response to 90 % of the relative dose intensity. Responses to NAC included radiological tumor shrinkage (69 %) and decreases in CA19-9 levels (89 %). R0 resection was performed for 87 % in resection, and the morbidity rate (40 %) was acceptable. The 2-year survival rate of the total cohort was 45.7 %. Patients who underwent resection without metastases after NAC-GS (n = 27) had an increased median overall survival (34.7 months) compared with those who did not undergo resection (P = 0.0017).

Conclusions

NAC-GS was well tolerated and safe when used in a multi-institutional setting. The R0 resection rate and the 2-year survival rate analysis are encouraging for patients with resectable and borderline PDAC.
Literature
2.
4.
go back to reference Matsuno S, Egawa S, Fukuyama S, et al. Pancreatic cancer registry in Japan: 20 years of experience. Pancreas. 2004;28:219–30.PubMedCrossRef Matsuno S, Egawa S, Fukuyama S, et al. Pancreatic cancer registry in Japan: 20 years of experience. Pancreas. 2004;28:219–30.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Hop WC, et al. Long-term survival and metastatic pattern of pancreatic and periampullary cancer after adjuvant chemoradiation or observation: long-term results of EORTC trial 40891. Ann Surg. 2007;246:734–40.PubMedCrossRef Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Hop WC, et al. Long-term survival and metastatic pattern of pancreatic and periampullary cancer after adjuvant chemoradiation or observation: long-term results of EORTC trial 40891. Ann Surg. 2007;246:734–40.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gutt R, Liauw SL, Weichselbaum RR. Adjuvant radiotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer: a lack of benefit or a lack of adequate trials? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:38–46.PubMedCrossRef Gutt R, Liauw SL, Weichselbaum RR. Adjuvant radiotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer: a lack of benefit or a lack of adequate trials? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:38–46.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1200–10.PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1200–10.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs. observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;297:267–77.PubMedCrossRef Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs. observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;297:267–77.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ueno H, Kosuge T, Matsuyama Y, et al. A randomised phase III trial comparing gemcitabine with surgery-only in patients with resected pancreatic cancer: Japanese Study Group of Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:908–15.PubMedCrossRef Ueno H, Kosuge T, Matsuyama Y, et al. A randomised phase III trial comparing gemcitabine with surgery-only in patients with resected pancreatic cancer: Japanese Study Group of Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:908–15.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs. gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304:1073–81.PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs. gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304:1073–81.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Katz MH, Fleming JB, Lee JE, Pisters PW. Current status of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Oncologist. 2010;15:1205–13.PubMedCrossRef Katz MH, Fleming JB, Lee JE, Pisters PW. Current status of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Oncologist. 2010;15:1205–13.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Reni M. Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer: time for phase III testing? World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:4883–7.PubMedCrossRef Reni M. Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer: time for phase III testing? World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:4883–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Artinyan A, Anaya DA, McKenzie S, Ellenhorn JD, Kim J. Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117:2044–9.PubMedCrossRef Artinyan A, Anaya DA, McKenzie S, Ellenhorn JD, Kim J. Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117:2044–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Palmer DH, Stocken DD, Hewitt H, et al. A randomized phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2088–96.PubMedCrossRef Palmer DH, Stocken DD, Hewitt H, et al. A randomized phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2088–96.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Heinrich S, Pestalozzi BC, Schäfer M, Weber A, Bauerfeind P, Knuth A, Clavien PA. Prospective phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2526–31.PubMedCrossRef Heinrich S, Pestalozzi BC, Schäfer M, Weber A, Bauerfeind P, Knuth A, Clavien PA. Prospective phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2526–31.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sahora K, Kuehrer I, Eisenhut A, et al. NeoGemOx: gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced, nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2011;149:311–20.PubMedCrossRef Sahora K, Kuehrer I, Eisenhut A, et al. NeoGemOx: gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced, nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2011;149:311–20.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:548–57.PubMedCrossRef Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:548–57.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Okusaka T, Funakoshi A, Furuse J, et al. A late phase II study of S-1 for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;61:615–21.PubMedCrossRef Okusaka T, Funakoshi A, Furuse J, et al. A late phase II study of S-1 for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;61:615–21.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Morizane C, Okusaka T, Furuse J, et al. A phase II study of S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;63:313–9.PubMedCrossRef Morizane C, Okusaka T, Furuse J, et al. A phase II study of S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;63:313–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ueno H, Okusaka T, Ikeda M, et al. A phase I study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oral S-1 for advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2005;69:421–7.PubMedCrossRef Ueno H, Okusaka T, Ikeda M, et al. A phase I study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oral S-1 for advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2005;69:421–7.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lee GW, Kim HJ, Ju JH, et al. Phase II trial of S-1 in combination with gemcitabine for chemo-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;64:707–13.PubMedCrossRef Lee GW, Kim HJ, Ju JH, et al. Phase II trial of S-1 in combination with gemcitabine for chemo-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;64:707–13.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nakai Y, Isayama H, Sasaki T, et al. A pilot study for combination chemotherapy using gemcitabine and S-1 for advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2009;77:300–3.PubMedCrossRef Nakai Y, Isayama H, Sasaki T, et al. A pilot study for combination chemotherapy using gemcitabine and S-1 for advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2009;77:300–3.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Oh DY, Cha Y, Choi IS, et al. A multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65:527–36.PubMedCrossRef Oh DY, Cha Y, Choi IS, et al. A multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65:527–36.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hirano S, Kondo S, Hara T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2007;246:46–51.PubMedCrossRef Hirano S, Kondo S, Hara T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2007;246:46–51.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Padhani AR, Ollivier L. The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:983–6.PubMed Padhani AR, Ollivier L. The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:983–6.PubMed
27.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. Chicago: Springer; 2002. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. Chicago: Springer; 2002.
28.
go back to reference Evans DB, Rich TA, Byrd DR, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg. 1992;127:1335–9.PubMedCrossRef Evans DB, Rich TA, Byrd DR, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg. 1992;127:1335–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ioka T, Ikeda M, Ohkawa S, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) versus S-1 versus gemcitabine (GEM) in unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study (abstract). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4007.CrossRef Ioka T, Ikeda M, Ohkawa S, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) versus S-1 versus gemcitabine (GEM) in unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study (abstract). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4007.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Piperdi M, McDade TP, Shim JK, et al. A neoadjuvant strategy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma increases the likelihood of receiving all components of care: lessons from a single-institution database. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12:204–10.CrossRef Piperdi M, McDade TP, Shim JK, et al. A neoadjuvant strategy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma increases the likelihood of receiving all components of care: lessons from a single-institution database. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12:204–10.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Le Scodan R, Mornex F, Girard N, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation in potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: feasibility, treatment effect evaluation and prognostic factors, analysis of the SFRO-FFCD 9704 trial and literature review. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1387–96.PubMedCrossRef Le Scodan R, Mornex F, Girard N, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation in potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: feasibility, treatment effect evaluation and prognostic factors, analysis of the SFRO-FFCD 9704 trial and literature review. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1387–96.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:52–60.PubMedCrossRef Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:52–60.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde C, Friess H, Kleeff J. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7: e1000267.PubMedCrossRef Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde C, Friess H, Kleeff J. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7: e1000267.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference VanHouten JP, White RR, Jackson GP. A decision model of therapy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. J Surg Res. 2012;174:222–30.PubMedCrossRef VanHouten JP, White RR, Jackson GP. A decision model of therapy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. J Surg Res. 2012;174:222–30.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Heinrich S, Pestalozzi B, Lesurtel M, et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine/oxaliplatin plus adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized multicenter phase III study (NEOPAC study). BMC Cancer. 2011;11:346.PubMedCrossRef Heinrich S, Pestalozzi B, Lesurtel M, et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine/oxaliplatin plus adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized multicenter phase III study (NEOPAC study). BMC Cancer. 2011;11:346.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF). Surgery. 2005:138:8–13.PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF). Surgery. 2005:138:8–13.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007:142:761–8.PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007:142:761–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and S-1 for Resectable and Borderline Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Results from a Prospective Multi-institutional Phase 2 Trial
Authors
Fuyuhiko Motoi, MD
Kazuyuki Ishida, MD
Fumiyoshi Fujishima, MD
Shigeru Ottomo, MD
Masaya Oikawa, MD
Takaho Okada, MD
Hiromune Shimamura, MD
Shinichi Takemura, MD
Fuminori Ono, MD
Masanori Akada, MD
Kei Nakagawa, MD
Yu Katayose, MD
Shinichi Egawa, MD
Michiaki Unno, MD
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3129-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2013 Go to the issue