Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2013

01-10-2013 | Thoracic Oncology

Surgical Prevention of Reflux after Esophagectomy for Cancer

Authors: Maartje van der Schaaf, PhD student, A. Johar, BSc, MSc, P. Lagergren, PhD, I. Rouvelas, MD, PhD, J. Gossage, MD, R. Mason, ChM, MD, FRCSEd, J. Lagergren, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reflux frequently occurs after a gastric conduit has replaced the resected esophagus. In this Swedish population-based cohort study, the potential antireflux effects of using cervical anastomosis, intrathoracic antireflux anastomosis, or pyloric drainage, and a risk of dysphagia due to cervical anastomosis and intrathoracic antireflux anastomosis were studied.

Methods

Patients undergoing esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction in 2001–2005 were included. Reflux symptoms and dysphagia were assessed 6 months and 3 years postoperatively using a validated questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-OES18). The study exposures were cervical anastomosis, antireflux anastomosis, and pyloric drainage procedure. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity-adjusted analyses based on multinomial logistic regression estimated odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for potential confounding.

Results

A total of 304 patients were included in the study. Adjusted ORs for reflux symptoms were 0.9 (95 % CI 0.3–2.2) for patients with a cervical anastomosis compared to patients with an intrathoracic anastomosis, 0.9 (95 % CI 0.4–2.0) for patients with an antireflux anastomosis versus patients with a conventional anastomosis, and 1.5 (95 % CI 0.9–2.6) for patients after pyloric drainage versus patients without such a pyloric drainage procedure. Dysphagia was not statistically significantly increased after cervical anastomosis or antireflux anastomosis. ORs were virtually similar 3 years after surgery. No interactions were identified. The propensity analyses rendered similar results as the logistic regression models, except for a possibly increased dysphagia with a cervical anastomosis.

Conclusions

Cervical anastomosis, antireflux anastomosis, and pyloric drainage do not seem to prevent reflux symptoms 6 months or 3 years after esophagectomy for cancer with a gastric conduit.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Djarv T, Lagergren J, Blazeby JM, Lagergren P. Long-term health-related quality of life following surgery for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1121–6.CrossRefPubMed Djarv T, Lagergren J, Blazeby JM, Lagergren P. Long-term health-related quality of life following surgery for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1121–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, et al. Association between quality of life scores and short-term outcome after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus or gastric cardia. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1502–7.CrossRefPubMed Blazeby JM, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, et al. Association between quality of life scores and short-term outcome after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus or gastric cardia. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1502–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Shibuya S, Fukudo S, Shineha R, et al. High incidence of reflux esophagitis observed by routine endoscopic examination after gastric pull-up esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2003;27:580–3.CrossRefPubMed Shibuya S, Fukudo S, Shineha R, et al. High incidence of reflux esophagitis observed by routine endoscopic examination after gastric pull-up esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2003;27:580–3.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bemelman WA, Verburg J, Brummelkamp WH, Klopper PJ. A physical model of the intrathoracic stomach. Am J Physiol. 1988;254:G168–75.PubMed Bemelman WA, Verburg J, Brummelkamp WH, Klopper PJ. A physical model of the intrathoracic stomach. Am J Physiol. 1988;254:G168–75.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Aly A, Jamieson GG, Pyragius M, Devitt PG. Antireflux anastomosis following oesophagectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74:434–8.CrossRefPubMed Aly A, Jamieson GG, Pyragius M, Devitt PG. Antireflux anastomosis following oesophagectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74:434–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Aly A, Jamieson GG, Watson DI, et al. An antireflux anastomosis following esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:470–5.CrossRefPubMed Aly A, Jamieson GG, Watson DI, et al. An antireflux anastomosis following esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:470–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Velanovich V, Mohlberg N. The split-stomach fundoplication after esophagogastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:178–83.CrossRefPubMed Velanovich V, Mohlberg N. The split-stomach fundoplication after esophagogastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:178–83.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference De Leyn P, Coosemans W, Lerut T. Early and late functional results in patients with intrathoracic gastric replacement after oesophagectomy for carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1992;6:79–84.CrossRefPubMed De Leyn P, Coosemans W, Lerut T. Early and late functional results in patients with intrathoracic gastric replacement after oesophagectomy for carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1992;6:79–84.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference D’Journo XB, Martin J, Ferraro P, Duranceau A. The esophageal remnant after gastric interposition. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:377–88.CrossRefPubMed D’Journo XB, Martin J, Ferraro P, Duranceau A. The esophageal remnant after gastric interposition. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:377–88.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference van Heijl M, Gooszen JA, Fockens P, et al. Risk factors for development of benign cervical strictures after esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1064–9.CrossRefPubMed van Heijl M, Gooszen JA, Fockens P, et al. Risk factors for development of benign cervical strictures after esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1064–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sutcliffe RP, Forshaw MJ, Tandon R, et al. Anastomotic strictures and delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy: incidence, risk factors and management. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:712–7.CrossRefPubMed Sutcliffe RP, Forshaw MJ, Tandon R, et al. Anastomotic strictures and delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy: incidence, risk factors and management. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:712–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Palmes D, Weilinghoff M, Colombo-Benkmann M, et al. Effect of pyloric drainage procedures on gastric passage and bile reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007;392:135–41.CrossRefPubMed Palmes D, Weilinghoff M, Colombo-Benkmann M, et al. Effect of pyloric drainage procedures on gastric passage and bile reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007;392:135–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE, et al. Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg. 2002;19:160–4.CrossRefPubMed Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE, et al. Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg. 2002;19:160–4.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chattopadhyay TK, Shad SK, Kumar A. Intragastric bile acid and symptoms in patients with an intrathoracic stomach after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 1993;80:371–3.CrossRefPubMed Chattopadhyay TK, Shad SK, Kumar A. Intragastric bile acid and symptoms in patients with an intrathoracic stomach after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 1993;80:371–3.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Poghosyan T, Gaujoux S, Chirica M, et al. Functional disorders and quality of life after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for cancer. J Visc Surg. 2011;148:e327–35.CrossRefPubMed Poghosyan T, Gaujoux S, Chirica M, et al. Functional disorders and quality of life after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for cancer. J Visc Surg. 2011;148:e327–35.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Borst HG, Dragojevic D, Stegmann T, Hetzer R. Anastomotic leakage, stenosis, and reflux after esophageal replacement. World J Surg. 1978;2:861–4.CrossRefPubMed Borst HG, Dragojevic D, Stegmann T, Hetzer R. Anastomotic leakage, stenosis, and reflux after esophageal replacement. World J Surg. 1978;2:861–4.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bais JE, Wijnhoven BP, Masclee AA, et al. Analysis and surgical treatment of persistent dysphagia after Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg. 2001;88:569–76.CrossRefPubMed Bais JE, Wijnhoven BP, Masclee AA, et al. Analysis and surgical treatment of persistent dysphagia after Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg. 2001;88:569–76.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR. Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies. Am J Surg. 1996;171:36–9.CrossRefPubMed Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR. Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies. Am J Surg. 1996;171:36–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lu M, et al. Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg. 2006;243:204–11.CrossRefPubMed Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lu M, et al. Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg. 2006;243:204–11.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, Nyren O. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:825–31.CrossRefPubMed Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, Nyren O. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:825–31.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1384–94.CrossRefPubMed Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1384–94.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lagergren P, Johar AM, Lagergren J. Validation of the reflux scale in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-OES18. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(5):1097–103.CrossRefPubMed Lagergren P, Johar AM, Lagergren J. Validation of the reflux scale in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-OES18. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(5):1097–103.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Djarv T, Lagergren P. Six-month postoperative quality of life predicts long-term survival after oesophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:530–5.CrossRefPubMed Djarv T, Lagergren P. Six-month postoperative quality of life predicts long-term survival after oesophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:530–5.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Djarv T, Blazeby JM, Lagergren P. Predictors of postoperative quality of life after esophagectomy for cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1963–8.CrossRefPubMed Djarv T, Blazeby JM, Lagergren P. Predictors of postoperative quality of life after esophagectomy for cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1963–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference D’Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–81.CrossRefPubMed D’Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–81.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Imbens GW. The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika. 2000;87:5.CrossRef Imbens GW. The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika. 2000;87:5.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Reeve BB, Smith AW, Arora NK, Hays RD. Reducing bias in cancer research: application of propensity score matching. Health Care Financ Rev. 2008;29:69–80.PubMed Reeve BB, Smith AW, Arora NK, Hays RD. Reducing bias in cancer research: application of propensity score matching. Health Care Financ Rev. 2008;29:69–80.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20.CrossRefPubMed Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference D’Journo XB, Martin J, Rakovich G, et al. Mucosal damage in the esophageal remnant after esophagectomy and gastric transposition. Ann Surg. 2009;249:262–8.CrossRefPubMed D’Journo XB, Martin J, Rakovich G, et al. Mucosal damage in the esophageal remnant after esophagectomy and gastric transposition. Ann Surg. 2009;249:262–8.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Johansson J, Johnsson F, Groshen S, Walther B. Pharyngeal reflux after gastric pull-up esophagectomy with neck and chest anastomoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:1078–83.CrossRefPubMed Johansson J, Johnsson F, Groshen S, Walther B. Pharyngeal reflux after gastric pull-up esophagectomy with neck and chest anastomoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:1078–83.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Okuyama M, Motoyama S, Maruyama K, et al. Proton pump inhibitors relieve and prevent symptoms related to gastric acidity after esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2008;32:246–54.CrossRefPubMed Okuyama M, Motoyama S, Maruyama K, et al. Proton pump inhibitors relieve and prevent symptoms related to gastric acidity after esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2008;32:246–54.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Storr M, Meining A, Allescher HD. Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis. 2000;18:93–102.CrossRefPubMed Storr M, Meining A, Allescher HD. Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis. 2000;18:93–102.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Khan OA, Manners J, Rengarajan A, Dunning J. Does pyloroplasty following esophagectomy improve early clinical outcomes? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6:247–50.CrossRefPubMed Khan OA, Manners J, Rengarajan A, Dunning J. Does pyloroplasty following esophagectomy improve early clinical outcomes? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6:247–50.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Fok M, Cheng SW, Wong J. Pyloroplasty versus no drainage in gastric replacement of the esophagus. Am J Surg. 1991;162:447–52.CrossRefPubMed Fok M, Cheng SW, Wong J. Pyloroplasty versus no drainage in gastric replacement of the esophagus. Am J Surg. 1991;162:447–52.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Surgical Prevention of Reflux after Esophagectomy for Cancer
Authors
Maartje van der Schaaf, PhD student
A. Johar, BSc, MSc
P. Lagergren, PhD
I. Rouvelas, MD, PhD
J. Gossage, MD
R. Mason, ChM, MD, FRCSEd
J. Lagergren, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3041-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2013 Go to the issue