Top

Published in:

01-05-2013 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

The Impact of Preoperative Lymph Node Size on Long-Term Outcome Following Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Authors: Masanori Tokunaga, MD, Norihiko Sugisawa, MD, Yutaka Tanizawa, MD, PhD, Etsuro Bando, MD, PhD, Taiichi Kawamura, MD, PhD, Masanori Terashima, MD, PhD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2013

Abstract

Background

Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) is widely used to predict pathological nodal status. However, an appropriate nodal size cutoff value to predict pathological nodal status has not been determined, and the impact of preoperative lymph node size on long-term outcomes is unclear.

Methods

This study included 137 gastric cancer patients with nodal involvement who underwent R0 gastrectomy between September 2002 and December 2006. Lymph nodes with a short-axis diameter of 10 mm or more as measured by MDCT were regarded as metastasized. An appropriate cutoff value with a high positive predictive value (PPV) and high specificity also was identified, and the subsequent clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes were investigated.

Results

A cutoff value of 15 mm was found to be appropriate for grouping patients into large (≥15 mm) and small (<15 mm) lymph node metastasis (LLNM and SLNM) groups, with a high PPV (98.6 %) and specificity (99.8 %). There were no differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the groups except for pathological nodal status. In the LLNM group, the 5-year survival rate was 55 %, which was significantly lower than in the SLNM group (73.2 %; P = 0.008). After stratification by tumor depth, the same trend was observed in patients with pT3 disease (46.8 % vs. 72.7 %; P = 0.015) and those with pT4 disease (14.3 % vs. 64.8 %; P = 0.035).

Conclusions

Gastric cancer patients with lymph nodes measuring 15 mm or more preoperatively have worse long-term outcomes. These patients would therefore be suitable candidates for future clinical trials investigating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapies.

Maruyama K, Kaminishi M, Hayashi K, Isobe Y, Honda I, Katai H, Arai K, Kodera Y, Nashimoto A. Gastric cancer treated in 1991 in Japan: data analysis of nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2006;9(2):51–66.PubMedCrossRef

Isobe Y, Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Oda I, Hayashi K, Miyashiro I, Katai H, Tsujitani S, Kodera Y, Seto Y, et al. Gastric cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(4):301–6.PubMedCrossRef

Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Stemmermann GN, Haller DG, Ajani JA, Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(10):725–30.PubMedCrossRef

Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20.PubMedCrossRef

Kinoshita T, Konishi M, Nakagohri T, Inoue K, Oda T, Takahashi S, Boku N, Ohtsu A, Yoshida S. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for scirrhous gastric cancer: a pilot study. Gastric Cancer. 2003;6(Suppl 1):40–4.PubMedCrossRef

Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, Furukawa H, Nakajima T, Ohashi Y, Imamura H, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1810–20.PubMedCrossRef

Yoshikawa T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Sano T, Imamura H, Fujitani K, Oshita H, Ito S, Kawashima Y, Fukushima N. Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extended surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(9):1015–22.PubMedCrossRef

Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Chung HC, Park YK, Lee KH, Lee KW, Kim YH, Noh SI, Cho JY, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9813):315–21.PubMedCrossRef

Inoue T, Yachida S, Usuki H, Kimura T, Hagiike M, Okano K, Suzuki Y. Pilot feasibility study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S-1 in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer featuring adjacent tissue invasion or JGCA bulky N2 lymph node metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(9):2937–45.

10.

Tsuchida K, Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, Cho H, Kobayashi O. Indications for staging laparoscopy in clinical T4M0 gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2011;35(12):2703–9.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Kawaguchi T, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Murayama Y, Kuriu Y, Ikoma H, Nakanishi M, et al. Nodal Counts on MDCT as a Surrogate Marker for Surgical Curability in Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8):2465–70.

12.

Yan C, Zhu ZG, Yan M, Zhang H, Pan ZL, Chen J, Xiang M, Chen MM, Liu BY, Yin HR, et al. Value of multidetector-row computed tomography in the preoperative T and N staging of gastric carcinoma: a large-scale Chinese study. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100(3):205–14.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Yan C, Zhu ZG, Yan M, Zhang H, Pan ZL, Chen J, Xiang M, Chen MM, Liu BY, Yin HR, et al. Size of the largest lymph node visualized on multi-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) is useful in predicting metastatic lymph node status of gastric cancer. J Int Med Res. 2010;38(1):22–33.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC, Kang WY, Hsieh JS, Jaw TS, Wu MT, Liu GC. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT–correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology. 2007;242(2):472–82.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Kim YN, Choi D, Kim SH, Kim MJ, Lee SJ, Lee WJ, Kim S, Kim JJ. Gastric cancer staging at isotropic MDCT including coronal and sagittal MPR images: endoscopically diagnosed early vs. advanced gastric cancer. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34(1):26–34.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST, Kim JS, Kim KW, Kim PN, Lee MG, Ha HK. Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology. 2005;236(3):879–85.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Yang DM, Kim HC, Jin W, Ryu CW, Kang JH, Park CH, Kim HS, Jung DH. 64 multidetector-row computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: histological correlation. J Comp Assist Tomogr. 2007;31(1):98–103.CrossRef

18.

Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim SH, Kim WH, Lee KU, Yang HK. Diagnostic accuracy of T and N stages with endoscopy, stomach protocol CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography in early gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(1):20–7.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.

20.

Japanese gastric cancer: a Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1(1):10–24.

21.

Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12(1):6–22.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Dhar DK, Kubota H, Kinukawa N, Maruyama R, Kyriazanos ID, Ohno S, Nagasue N. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node size in patients with gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90(12):1522–30.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schweartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Dhar DK, Yoshimura H, Kinukawa N, Maruyama R, Tachibana M, Kohno H, Kubota H, Nagasue N. Metastatic lymph node size and colorectal cancer prognosis. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200(1):20–8.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Dhar DK, Tachibana M, Kinukawa N, Riruke M, Kohno H, Little AG, Nagasue N. The prognostic significance of lymph node size in patients with squamous esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(10):1010–6.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Cheong O, Oh ST, Kim BS, Yook JH, Kim JH, Im JT, Park GC. Large metastatic lymph node size, especially more than 2 cm: independent predictor of poor prognosis in node-positive gastric carcinoma. World J Surg. 2008;32(2):262–6.PubMedCrossRef

Title: The Impact of Preoperative Lymph Node Size on Long-Term Outcome Following Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Authors: Masanori Tokunaga, MD
Norihiko Sugisawa, MD
Yutaka Tanizawa, MD, PhD
Etsuro Bando, MD, PhD
Taiichi Kawamura, MD, PhD
Masanori Terashima, MD, PhD, FACS
Publication date: 01-05-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2699-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The Impact of Preoperative Lymph Node Size on Long-Term Outcome Following Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Lack of Either Estrogen or Progesterone Receptor Expression Is Associated with Poor Survival Outcome among Luminal A Breast Cancer Subtype

Does Histologic Type Correlate to Outcome after Pelvic Exenteration for Cervical and Vaginal Cancer?

Effect of MRI on the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Perigastric Tumor Deposits in Primary Gastric Cancer: Implications for Patient Prognosis and Staging

Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraoperative Administration of Paclitaxel-loaded Expansile Nanoparticles Delay Tumor Recurrence in Ovarian Carcinoma

Influence of Treatment Modality in Outcomes for Different Stages of Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinomas