Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2013

01-02-2013 | Breast Oncology

Should Breast Density Influence Patient Selection for Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Authors: Nimmi S. Kapoor, MD, Anne Eaton, MS, Tari A. King, MD, Sujata Patil, PhD, Michelle Stempel, MS, Elizabeth Morris, MD, Edi Brogi, MD, Monica Morrow, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In a previous study of the relationship between breast density and primary tumor features, we observed a higher mastectomy rate in patients with extremely dense breasts. Here we examine possible reasons for this finding.

Methods

Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database of 1,056 invasive breast cancer patients from January 2005 to June 2007. Mammographic density was assigned by Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification. Initial and final surgical procedures, and patient and tumor variables were recorded.

Results

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was attempted in 758 patients (72 %), 385 (51 %) of whom had preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Initial BCS was less common among patients with the highest (BI-RADS 4) breast density compared to patients with less-dense breasts (52 vs. 74 %; p < 0.0001), but MRI use was more common (65 vs. 33 %; p < 0.0001). Adjusting for clinical and pathologic variables, patients with the highest breast density had 1.94-times (95 % confidence interval 1.44–2.62; p < 0.0001) the odds of initial mastectomy compared to patients with less-dense breasts. After initial BCS, 387 patients (51 %) had positive shaved margins, 96 (25 %) of whom converted to mastectomy. MRI did not correlate with the rate of positive margins overall or among those with dense breasts. Adjusting for clinical and pathologic variables, density did not predict margin status or conversion to mastectomy. In a multivariate model, age, histologic grade, extensive intraductal component, and multicentricity/multifocality were independently associated with conversion to mastectomy.

Conclusions

Density alone seems to influence the decision to proceed with initial mastectomy. When BCS was attempted, breast density was not associated with positive margins or conversion to mastectomy. A benefit of MRI in decreasing positive margins was not observed. These data do not support the use of breast density as a selection criterion for BCS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:227–36.PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:227–36.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vacek PM, Geller BM. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13:715–22. Vacek PM, Geller BM. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13:715–22.
3.
go back to reference Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K, et al. Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16:43–9.CrossRef Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K, et al. Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16:43–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, et al. Case–Control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:781–5.PubMedCrossRef Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, et al. Case–Control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:781–5.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, et al. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programme. J Med Screen. 1998;5:207–12. Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, et al. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programme. J Med Screen. 1998;5:207–12.
6.
go back to reference Arora N, King TA, Jacks LM, et al. Impact of breast density on the presenting features of malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17 Suppl 3:211–8.PubMedCrossRef Arora N, King TA, Jacks LM, et al. Impact of breast density on the presenting features of malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17 Suppl 3:211–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Morrow M, Harris JR. Practice guideline for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:362–376.CrossRef Morrow M, Harris JR. Practice guideline for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:362–376.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wright MJ, Park J, Fey JV, et al. Perpendicular inked versus tangential shaved margins in breast-conserving surgery: Does the method matter? J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:541–9.PubMedCrossRef Wright MJ, Park J, Fey JV, et al. Perpendicular inked versus tangential shaved margins in breast-conserving surgery: Does the method matter? J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:541–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Holland R, Connolly JL, Gelman R, et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:113–8.PubMed Holland R, Connolly JL, Gelman R, et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:113–8.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Sabel MS, Rogers K, Griffith K, et al. Residual disease after reexcision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:99–103.PubMedCrossRef Sabel MS, Rogers K, Griffith K, et al. Residual disease after reexcision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:99–103.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer. 1995;76:259–67.PubMedCrossRef Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer. 1995;76:259–67.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Morrow M, Schmidt RA, Bucci C. Breast conservation for mammographically occult carcinoma. Ann Surg. 1998;227:502–6.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M, Schmidt RA, Bucci C. Breast conservation for mammographically occult carcinoma. Ann Surg. 1998;227:502–6.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yang TJ, Yang Q, Haffty BG, et al. Prognosis for mammographically occult, early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:79–84.PubMedCrossRef Yang TJ, Yang Q, Haffty BG, et al. Prognosis for mammographically occult, early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:79–84.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cil T, Fishell E, Hanna W, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 2009;115:5780–7.PubMedCrossRef Cil T, Fishell E, Hanna W, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 2009;115:5780–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Buist DS, Abraham LA, Barlow WE, et al. Diagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;124:863–73.CrossRef Buist DS, Abraham LA, Barlow WE, et al. Diagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;124:863–73.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7.PubMedCrossRef Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedCrossRef Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:161–9.PubMedCrossRef Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:161–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):563–71.PubMedCrossRef Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):563–71.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526–33.PubMedCrossRef Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526–33.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Liberman L, Kaplan J, Van Zee KJ, et al. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:565–72.PubMed Liberman L, Kaplan J, Van Zee KJ, et al. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:565–72.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, et al. Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:32–7.PubMedCrossRef Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, et al. Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:32–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Malik HZ, Wilkinson L, George WD, et al. Preoperative mammographic features predict clinicopathological risk factors for the development of local recurrence in breast cancer. Breast. 2000;9:329–33.PubMedCrossRef Malik HZ, Wilkinson L, George WD, et al. Preoperative mammographic features predict clinicopathological risk factors for the development of local recurrence in breast cancer. Breast. 2000;9:329–33.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Should Breast Density Influence Patient Selection for Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Authors
Nimmi S. Kapoor, MD
Anne Eaton, MS
Tari A. King, MD
Sujata Patil, PhD
Michelle Stempel, MS
Elizabeth Morris, MD
Edi Brogi, MD
Monica Morrow, MD
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2604-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2013 Go to the issue