Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2012

01-07-2012 | Colorectal Cancer

The Relationship of Lymph Node Evaluation and Colorectal Cancer Survival After Curative Resection: A Multi-Institutional Study

Authors: Yukihide Kanemitsu, MD, Koji Komori, PhD, Seiji Ishiguro, PhD, Toshiaki Watanabe, PhD, Kenichi Sugihara, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This multicenter retrospective study aimed to clarify whether the number of lymph nodes retrieved influenced staging and survival in colorectal cancer.

Methods

We evaluated a total of 4538 patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer with stage I, stage II, and stage III.

Results

The median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 19. The 5-year actuarial disease-specific survival of colon cancer patients with stage I, stage II, and stage III was 99.0%, 94.1%, and 79.1%, respectively, and that for rectal cancer patients with stage I, stage II, and stage III was 98.2%, 88.3%, and 69.1%, respectively. After adjustment for confounders, the number of lymph nodes retrieved and the number of positive nodes were both significant in prognosis for patients with colon cancer and rectal cancer. Survival improved with an increasing number of nodes in stage II patients. In stage III, patients within strata of retrieval of fewer than 12 nodes with a cutoff based on quartiles had lower discriminative ability (c-index 0.683). Patients who were treated at the hospitals with higher average node counts (>23.4 nodes) and higher 12-node measure compliance (>80%) experienced better survival than those treated at the hospitals with lower average node counts for advanced T-stage.

Conclusion

This study found that the number of lymph nodes retrieved and the number of positive nodes are both important prognostic factors. At least a 12-node threshold may be supported as a measure to improve a predictive capacity within individual patients and as a quality control parameter of hospital performance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K, et al. Changes in colorectal cancer during a 20-year period: an extended report from the multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer, Japan. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(10 Suppl.):S32–43. Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K, et al. Changes in colorectal cancer during a 20-year period: an extended report from the multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer, Japan. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(10 Suppl.):S32–43.
3.
go back to reference Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, et al. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433–41.PubMedCrossRef Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, et al. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433–41.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dukes CE, Bussey HJ. The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis. Br J Cancer. 1958;12:309–20.PubMedCrossRef Dukes CE, Bussey HJ. The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis. Br J Cancer. 1958;12:309–20.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Newland RC, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT, et al. The relationship of survival to staging and grading of colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study of 503 cases. Cancer. 1981;47:1424–9.PubMedCrossRef Newland RC, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT, et al. The relationship of survival to staging and grading of colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study of 503 cases. Cancer. 1981;47:1424–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Fisher R, et al. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer. Br J Surg. 1985;72:698–702.PubMedCrossRef Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Fisher R, et al. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer. Br J Surg. 1985;72:698–702.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tepper JE, O’Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:157–63.PubMed Tepper JE, O’Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:157–63.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Joseph NE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Accuracy of determining nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:213–8.PubMedCrossRef Joseph NE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Accuracy of determining nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:213–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Scott KW, Grace RH. Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance. Br J Surg. 1989;76:1165–7.PubMedCrossRef Scott KW, Grace RH. Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance. Br J Surg. 1989;76:1165–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, et al. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;106:209–16.PubMed Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, et al. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;106:209–16.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT, et al. For patients with Dukes’ B (TNM stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer. 1998;83:666–72.PubMedCrossRef Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT, et al. For patients with Dukes’ B (TNM stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer. 1998;83:666–72.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, et al. Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2896–900.PubMed Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, et al. Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2896–900.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Cianchi F, Palomba A, Boddi V, et al. Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined. World J Surg. 2002;26:384–9.PubMedCrossRef Cianchi F, Palomba A, Boddi V, et al. Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined. World J Surg. 2002;26:384–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sarli L, Bader G, Iusco D, et al. Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:272–9.PubMedCrossRef Sarli L, Bader G, Iusco D, et al. Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:272–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Greco P, Andreola S, Magro G, et al. Potential pathological understaging of pT3 rectal cancer with less than 26 lymph nodes recovered: a prospective study based on a resampling of 50 rectal specimens. Virchows Arch. 2006;449:647–51.PubMedCrossRef Greco P, Andreola S, Magro G, et al. Potential pathological understaging of pT3 rectal cancer with less than 26 lymph nodes recovered: a prospective study based on a resampling of 50 rectal specimens. Virchows Arch. 2006;449:647–51.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. 2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kalahari Shuppan; 2009. Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. 2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kalahari Shuppan; 2009.
19.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.
20.
go back to reference Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: John Wiley; 1980. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: John Wiley; 1980.
21.
go back to reference Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34:187–220. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34:187–220.
22.
go back to reference Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36.PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, et al. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247:2543–6.PubMedCrossRef Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, et al. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247:2543–6.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Shen SS, Haupt BX, Ro JY, et al. Number of lymph nodes examined and associated clinicopathologic factors in colorectal carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:781–6.PubMed Shen SS, Haupt BX, Ro JY, et al. Number of lymph nodes examined and associated clinicopathologic factors in colorectal carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:781–6.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Georgiou P, Tan E, Gouvas N, et al. Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1053–62.PubMedCrossRef Georgiou P, Tan E, Gouvas N, et al. Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1053–62.PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
go back to reference Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2912–9.PubMedCrossRef Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2912–9.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, et al. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:65–71.PubMedCrossRef Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, et al. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:65–71.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A, et al. Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg. 2002;235:458–63.PubMedCrossRef Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A, et al. Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg. 2002;235:458–63.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Maurel J, Launoy G, Grosclaude P, et al. Lymph node harvest reporting in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel: a French population-based study. Cancer. 1998;82:1482–6.PubMedCrossRef Maurel J, Launoy G, Grosclaude P, et al. Lymph node harvest reporting in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel: a French population-based study. Cancer. 1998;82:1482–6.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.CrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:272–8.PubMedCrossRef West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:272–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sigurdson ER. Lymph node dissection: is it diagnostic or therapeutic? J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:965–7.PubMedCrossRef Sigurdson ER. Lymph node dissection: is it diagnostic or therapeutic? J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:965–7.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Kim YW, Kim NK, Min BS, et al. The influence of the number of retrieved lymph nodes on staging and survival in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer undergoing tumor-specific mesorectal excision. Ann Surg. 2009;249:965–72.PubMedCrossRef Kim YW, Kim NK, Min BS, et al. The influence of the number of retrieved lymph nodes on staging and survival in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer undergoing tumor-specific mesorectal excision. Ann Surg. 2009;249:965–72.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1604–8.PubMedCrossRef Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1604–8.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, et al. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA. 2000;284:3028–35.PubMedCrossRef Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, et al. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA. 2000;284:3028–35.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rogers SO Jr, Wolf RE, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2006;244:1003–11.PubMedCrossRef Rogers SO Jr, Wolf RE, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2006;244:1003–11.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Relationship of Lymph Node Evaluation and Colorectal Cancer Survival After Curative Resection: A Multi-Institutional Study
Authors
Yukihide Kanemitsu, MD
Koji Komori, PhD
Seiji Ishiguro, PhD
Toshiaki Watanabe, PhD
Kenichi Sugihara, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2223-8

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2012 Go to the issue