Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Breast Oncology

Paravertebral Blocks in Breast Cancer Surgery: Is There a Difference in Postoperative Pain, Nausea, and Vomiting?

Authors: Rachel Aufforth, MD, Joses Jain, BSC, John Morreale, MD, Richard Baumgarten, MD, Jeffrey Falk, MD, FACS, Cheryl Wesen, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients with paravertebral blocks (PVB) undergoing breast cancer surgery with or without axillary staging.

Methods

An Institutional Review Board approved, retrospective chart review from January 2007 to December 2009 was performed at a single institution. Charts were reviewed for type of breast cancer surgery, axillary staging, PVB, PONV, postoperative pain score, dosages of pain medication and antiemetic medication given in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), and during the postoperative days (POD). The study population consisted of females with a diagnosis of breast cancer undergoing breast cancer surgery, with or without axillary staging. Patients were excluded if they: had simultaneous myocutaneous tissue flap breast reconstruction, had additional surgical procedures, used continuous delivery postoperative pain medications, had a history of chronic pain, or had a history of chronic antiemetics prior to surgery. All patients received standard perioperative medications per the anesthesia department.

Results

A total of 419 patients underwent breast cancer surgery during the given time period of which 337 patients were able to be included in the study. Of these patients, 241 of the 337 patients had PVB and 96 patients did not have PVB. The mean age was 59.5 years. The mean BMI was 28.7 kg/m2. Also, 45.5% of the patients who had PVB (110) had a mastectomy, while 41.1% of patients in the non-PVB cohort (39) had a mastectomy. In addition, 45 patients with PVB had immediate tissue expander reconstruction and only 14 patients in the non-PVB group. Of patients with PVB, 53.3% (129) had a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) and 33.5% (81) had full axillary dissections. Of patients in the non-PVB, 35.8% (34) had no axillary staging and 44.2% (42) underwent SLN. Also, 229 patients with PVB and 78 patients without PVB had a general anesthetic. Only 3.3% of patients with PVB and 4.2% of patients without PVB had postoperative nausea (P = 0.746). One patient with PVB and no patients without PVB reported emesis in the PACU (P = 1). There was no difference in morphine equivalents (P = 0.234) or in pain scores (P = 0.521) between the 2 groups in the PACU. There was no difference in amount of morphine equivalents given on POD0 (P = 0.8) or POD1 (P = 0.079). The reconstruction patients with PVB used less opioid analgesic on POD1 compared with the non-PVB reconstruction group (P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing breast cancer surgery who have paravertebral blocks have similar postoperative nausea and vomiting and similar postoperative pain scores compared with patients without paravertebral blocks. PVB may have an important role in decreasing postoperative pain and opioid analgesic usage in patients electing to have immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele S, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA, Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1402–5.PubMedCrossRef Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele S, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA, Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1402–5.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Goravanchi F, Parris RN, Kee SS, Kowalski AM, Frenzel JC, et al. Prospective randomized trial of paravertebral block for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Am J Surg. 2009;198:720–5.PubMedCrossRef Boughey JC, Goravanchi F, Parris RN, Kee SS, Kowalski AM, Frenzel JC, et al. Prospective randomized trial of paravertebral block for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Am J Surg. 2009;198:720–5.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tasmuth T, von Smitten K, Hietanen P, Kataja M, Kalso E. Pain and other symptoms after different treatment modalities of breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 1995;6:453–9.PubMed Tasmuth T, von Smitten K, Hietanen P, Kataja M, Kalso E. Pain and other symptoms after different treatment modalities of breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 1995;6:453–9.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Quinn A, Brown J, Wallace P, Asbury A. Studies in postoperative sequelae. nausea and vomiting—still a problem. Anaesthesia. 1994;49:62–5.PubMedCrossRef Quinn A, Brown J, Wallace P, Asbury A. Studies in postoperative sequelae. nausea and vomiting—still a problem. Anaesthesia. 1994;49:62–5.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Terheggen MA, Wille F, Borel Rinkes IH, Ionescu TI, Knape JT. Paravertebral blockade for minor breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:355–9.PubMed Terheggen MA, Wille F, Borel Rinkes IH, Ionescu TI, Knape JT. Paravertebral blockade for minor breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:355–9.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Conveney E, Weltz CR, Greengrass R, Iglehart JD, Leight GS, Steele SM, et al. Use of paravertebral block anesthesia in the surgical management of breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;227:496–501.CrossRef Conveney E, Weltz CR, Greengrass R, Iglehart JD, Leight GS, Steele SM, et al. Use of paravertebral block anesthesia in the surgical management of breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;227:496–501.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Exadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology. 2006;105:660–4.PubMedCrossRef Exadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology. 2006;105:660–4.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Weltz CR, Greengrass RA, Lyerly HK. Ambulatory surgical management of breast carcinoma using paravertebral block. Ann Surg. 1995;222:19–26.PubMedCrossRef Weltz CR, Greengrass RA, Lyerly HK. Ambulatory surgical management of breast carcinoma using paravertebral block. Ann Surg. 1995;222:19–26.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kairaluoma PM, Bachmann MS, Korpinen AK, Rosenberg PH, Pere PJ. Single-injection paravertebral block before general anesthesia enhances analgesia after breast cancer surgery with and without associated lymph node biopsy. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1837–43.PubMedCrossRef Kairaluoma PM, Bachmann MS, Korpinen AK, Rosenberg PH, Pere PJ. Single-injection paravertebral block before general anesthesia enhances analgesia after breast cancer surgery with and without associated lymph node biopsy. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1837–43.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Moller JF, Nikolajsen L, Todt SV, Ronning H, Carlsson PS. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery: a randomized double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1848–51.PubMedCrossRef Moller JF, Nikolajsen L, Todt SV, Ronning H, Carlsson PS. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery: a randomized double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1848–51.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Thavaneswaran P, Rudkin E, Cooter R, Moyes D, Maddern G. Paravertebral block for anesthesia: a systematic review. Anesthes Analg. 2010;110:1740–4.CrossRef Thavaneswaran P, Rudkin E, Cooter R, Moyes D, Maddern G. Paravertebral block for anesthesia: a systematic review. Anesthes Analg. 2010;110:1740–4.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Warltier D. Thoracic paravertebral block. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:771–80.CrossRef Warltier D. Thoracic paravertebral block. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:771–80.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Paravertebral Blocks in Breast Cancer Surgery: Is There a Difference in Postoperative Pain, Nausea, and Vomiting?
Authors
Rachel Aufforth, MD
Joses Jain, BSC
John Morreale, MD
Richard Baumgarten, MD
Jeffrey Falk, MD, FACS
Cheryl Wesen, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1899-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2012 Go to the issue