Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Breast Oncology

MRI Versus Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging (BSGI) in Newly Diagnosed Ductal Cell Carcinoma-in-situ: A Prospective Head-to-Head Trial

Authors: Jessica L. Keto, MD, Laurie Kirstein, MD, Diana P. Sanchez, BS, Tamara Fulop, MD, Laura McPartland, BS, Ilona Cohen, MD, Susan K. Boolbol, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mammography remains the standard imaging technique for the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS). Functional breast imaging, including breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has known limitations in evaluating DCIS. To date, there are limited data on the utility of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in DCIS. We sought to prospectively compare the sensitivity of BSGI to MRI in newly diagnosed DCIS patients.

Methods

Patients with newly diagnosed DCIS from June 1, 2009, through May 31, 2010, underwent a protocol with both breast MRI and BSGI. Each imaging study was read by a separate dedicated breast radiologist. Patients were excluded if excisional biopsy was performed for diagnosis, if their MRI was performed at an outside facility, or if final pathology revealed invasive carcinoma.

Results

There were 18 patients enrolled onto the study that had both MRI and BSGI for newly diagnosed DCIS. The sensitivity for MRI was 94% and for BSGI was 89% (P > 0.5, NS). There was one index tumor not seen on either MRI or BSGI, and one index tumor seen on MRI but not visualized on BSGI.

Discussion

Although BSGI has previously been shown to be as sensitive as MRI for detecting known invasive breast carcinoma, this study shows that BSGI is equally as sensitive as MRI at detecting newly diagnosed DCIS. As a result of the limited number of patients enrolled onto the study, larger prospective studies need to be performed to determine the true sensitivity and specificity of BSGI.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer Statistics, 2010. Cancer. 2010;60:277–300. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer Statistics, 2010. Cancer. 2010;60:277–300.
2.
go back to reference Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Kinne DW. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications. Radiology. 1989;170:411–5.PubMed Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Kinne DW. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications. Radiology. 1989;170:411–5.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Fisher B, Costantino J, Redmond C, et al. Lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer. N Eng J Med. 1993;328:1581–6.CrossRef Fisher B, Costantino J, Redmond C, et al. Lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer. N Eng J Med. 1993;328:1581–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–50.PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–50.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Eng J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.CrossRef Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Eng J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007;370:485–92.PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007;370:485–92.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 2005;11:382–90.PubMedCrossRef Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 2005;11:382–90.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1546–54.PubMedCrossRef Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1546–54.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rosen EL, Smith-Foley SA, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD, BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J. 2007;13:545–50.PubMedCrossRef Rosen EL, Smith-Foley SA, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD, BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J. 2007;13:545–50.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jansen SA, Paunesku T, Fan X, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: x-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model. Radiology. 2009;253:399–406.PubMedCrossRef Jansen SA, Paunesku T, Fan X, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: x-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model. Radiology. 2009;253:399–406.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Killelea BK, Gillego A, Kirstein LJ, et al. George Peters Award. How does breast-specific gamma imaging affect the management of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2009;198:470–4.PubMedCrossRef Killelea BK, Gillego A, Kirstein LJ, et al. George Peters Award. How does breast-specific gamma imaging affect the management of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2009;198:470–4.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kirstein LJ, Fulop T, McPartland L, Sanchez DP, Cohen I, Boolbol SK. MRI vs. breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in newly diagnosed breast cancer: a prospective head-to-head trial. Presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, 2010. Kirstein LJ, Fulop T, McPartland L, Sanchez DP, Cohen I, Boolbol SK. MRI vs. breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in newly diagnosed breast cancer: a prospective head-to-head trial. Presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, 2010.
13.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101–10.PubMed Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101–10.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Daniel BL, Yen YF, Glover GH, et al. Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. Radiology. 1998;209:409–19. Daniel BL, Yen YF, Glover GH, et al. Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. Radiology. 1998;209:409–19.
15.
go back to reference Brem RF, Shahan C, Rapleyea JA, et al. Detection of occult foci of breast cancer using breast-specific gamma imaging in women with one mammographic or clinically suspicious breast lesion. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:735–43.PubMedCrossRef Brem RF, Shahan C, Rapleyea JA, et al. Detection of occult foci of breast cancer using breast-specific gamma imaging in women with one mammographic or clinically suspicious breast lesion. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:735–43.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brem RF, Petrovitich I, Rapleyea JA, Young H, Teal CB, Kelly T. Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer—a comparative study. Breast J. 2007;13:465–9.PubMedCrossRef Brem RF, Petrovitich I, Rapleyea JA, Young H, Teal CB, Kelly T. Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer—a comparative study. Breast J. 2007;13:465–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Khalkhali I, Cutrone JA, Mena IG, et al. Scintimammography: the complementary role of Tc-99m sestamibi prone breast imaging for the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Radiology. 1995;196:421–6.PubMed Khalkhali I, Cutrone JA, Mena IG, et al. Scintimammography: the complementary role of Tc-99m sestamibi prone breast imaging for the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Radiology. 1995;196:421–6.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Khalkhali I, Villanueva-Meyer J, Edell SL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-sestamibi breast imaging: multicenter trial results. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1973–9.PubMed Khalkhali I, Villanueva-Meyer J, Edell SL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-sestamibi breast imaging: multicenter trial results. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1973–9.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Papantoniou V, Valsamaki P, Sotiropoulou E, et al. Increased breast density correlates with the proliferation-seeking radiotracer (99m)Tc(V)-DMSA uptake in florid epithelial hyperplasia and in mixed ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive ductal carcinoma but not in pure invasive ductal carcinoma or in mild epithelial hyperplasia. Mol Imaging. 2011 [Epub ahead of print]. Papantoniou V, Valsamaki P, Sotiropoulou E, et al. Increased breast density correlates with the proliferation-seeking radiotracer (99m)Tc(V)-DMSA uptake in florid epithelial hyperplasia and in mixed ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive ductal carcinoma but not in pure invasive ductal carcinoma or in mild epithelial hyperplasia. Mol Imaging. 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
20.
go back to reference Brem RF, Fishman M, Rapleyea JA. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:945–50.PubMedCrossRef Brem RF, Fishman M, Rapleyea JA. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:945–50.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Böhm-Vélez M, Kieper DA, Williams MB, Chang TS, Ward BH, Straka MR. A clinical evaluation of breast tissue uptake of Tc99m-sestamibi as a function of injected dose in breast cancer imaging: state of the art. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, 2011. Böhm-Vélez M, Kieper DA, Williams MB, Chang TS, Ward BH, Straka MR. A clinical evaluation of breast tissue uptake of Tc99m-sestamibi as a function of injected dose in breast cancer imaging: state of the art. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, 2011.
22.
go back to reference Thiessen C. Breast imaging using Tc99m-Sestamibi: breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) and molecular breast imaging (MBI)—is there a difference and is it possible to lower the radiation dose? Presented at National Consortium of Breast Centers Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 2011. Thiessen C. Breast imaging using Tc99m-Sestamibi: breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) and molecular breast imaging (MBI)—is there a difference and is it possible to lower the radiation dose? Presented at National Consortium of Breast Centers Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 2011.
23.
go back to reference Kirstein LJ, Fulop T, McPartland L, Sanchez DP, Cohen I, Boolbol SK. MRI vs breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in newly diagnosed breast cancer: a prospective head-to-head trial. Presented at The San Antonio Breast Conference, San Antonio, Texas. 2011. Kirstein LJ, Fulop T, McPartland L, Sanchez DP, Cohen I, Boolbol SK. MRI vs breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in newly diagnosed breast cancer: a prospective head-to-head trial. Presented at The San Antonio Breast Conference, San Antonio, Texas. 2011.
Metadata
Title
MRI Versus Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging (BSGI) in Newly Diagnosed Ductal Cell Carcinoma-in-situ: A Prospective Head-to-Head Trial
Authors
Jessica L. Keto, MD
Laurie Kirstein, MD
Diana P. Sanchez, BS
Tamara Fulop, MD
Laura McPartland, BS
Ilona Cohen, MD
Susan K. Boolbol, MD
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1848-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2012 Go to the issue