Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2011

01-07-2011 | Colorectal Cancer

Outcome of Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with High Operative Risk

Authors: Jensen T. C. Poon, MS, FRCSEd (Gen.), Wai-Lun Law, MS, FRCS (Edin), FACS, Lorraine C. Y. Chow, MBBS, Joe K. M. Fan, MS, FRCSEd (Gen.), Siu-Hung Lo, MBBS, FRCSEd (Gen.)

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is general concern that high-risk patients are more susceptible to the adverse effect of pneumoperitoneum and they are often denied laparoscopic surgery. This study investigated the impact of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection for patients with high operative risk, which was defined as American Society of Anesthesiologist classes 3 and 4.

Methods

Three hundred thirty-five consecutive high-risk patients who had colorectal cancer resection by open or laparoscopic surgery were included. The patient and tumor characteristics and operative outcomes were recorded prospectively, and comparison was made between the two groups.

Results

Compared to open surgery, patients with laparoscopic resection had a shorter hospital stay (8 [6–12] vs. 6 [4–9] days; P < 0.001), less blood loss (200 [100–400] vs. 140 [80–250] mL; P = 0.006), reduced cardiac complication rate (13.2% vs. 3.7%; P = 0.006), overall operative complication rate (36.6% vs. 21.3%; P = 0.006), and a trend toward a lower mortality rate (4.4% vs. 0.9%; P = 0.083). There was no difference in 3-year overall and disease-free survival between two groups. Operative blood loss (P = 0.035; odds ratio = 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–6.78) and open surgery (P = 0.007; odds ratio = 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–4.23) were independent factors for occurrence of complication.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection is associated with more favorable short-term results and should be recommended as the preferred treatment option for high-risk patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718–26.PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718–26.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, et al. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg. 2008;248:728–38.PubMedCrossRef Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, et al. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg. 2008;248:728–38.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–9.PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leung KL, Lai PB, Ho RL, et al. Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2000;231:506–11.PubMedCrossRef Leung KL, Lai PB, Ho RL, et al. Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2000;231:506–11.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–84.PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–84.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:655–62.PubMedCrossRef Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:655–62.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Poon JT, Law WL, Fan JK, et al. Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. World J Surg. 2009;33:2177–82.PubMedCrossRef Poon JT, Law WL, Fan JK, et al. Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. World J Surg. 2009;33:2177–82.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Poon RT, Chu KW, Ho JW, et al. Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg. 1999;23:463–7.PubMedCrossRef Poon RT, Chu KW, Ho JW, et al. Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg. 1999;23:463–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Law WL, Lee YM, Chu KW. Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:326–30.PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Lee YM, Chu KW. Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:326–30.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gerges FJ, Kanazi GE, Jabbour-Khoury SI. Anesthesia for laparoscopy: a review. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18:67–78.PubMedCrossRef Gerges FJ, Kanazi GE, Jabbour-Khoury SI. Anesthesia for laparoscopy: a review. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18:67–78.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Delgado S, Lacy AM, Garcia Valdecasas JC, et al. Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc. 2000;14:22–6.PubMedCrossRef Delgado S, Lacy AM, Garcia Valdecasas JC, et al. Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc. 2000;14:22–6.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, et al. Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg. 2003;138:252–6.PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, et al. Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg. 2003;138:252–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, et al. Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:923–9.PubMedCrossRef Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, et al. Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:923–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg. 1999;86:938–41.PubMedCrossRef Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg. 1999;86:938–41.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, et al. Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:326–32.PubMedCrossRef Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, et al. Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:326–32.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Arteaga GI, Lopez-Tomassetti Fernandez EM, Hernandez PY, et al. Effectiveness of colorectal laparoscopic surgery on patients at high anesthetic risk: an intervention cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:101–6.CrossRef Arteaga GI, Lopez-Tomassetti Fernandez EM, Hernandez PY, et al. Effectiveness of colorectal laparoscopic surgery on patients at high anesthetic risk: an intervention cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:101–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Marks JH, Kawun UB, Hamdan W, et al. Redefining contraindications to laparoscopic colorectal resection for high-risk patients. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1899–904.PubMedCrossRef Marks JH, Kawun UB, Hamdan W, et al. Redefining contraindications to laparoscopic colorectal resection for high-risk patients. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1899–904.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference McCloskey CA, Wilson MA, Hughes SJ, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe in the high-risk patient: a NSQIP risk-adjusted analysis. Surgery. 2007;142:594–7.PubMedCrossRef McCloskey CA, Wilson MA, Hughes SJ, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe in the high-risk patient: a NSQIP risk-adjusted analysis. Surgery. 2007;142:594–7.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Plocek MD, Geisler DP, Glennon EJ, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the complicated patient. Am J Surg. 2005;190:882–5.PubMedCrossRef Plocek MD, Geisler DP, Glennon EJ, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the complicated patient. Am J Surg. 2005;190:882–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Delgado S, Lacy AM, Filella X, et al. Acute phase response in laparoscopic and open colectomy in colon cancer: randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:638–46.PubMedCrossRef Delgado S, Lacy AM, Filella X, et al. Acute phase response in laparoscopic and open colectomy in colon cancer: randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:638–46.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, et al. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:242–6.PubMedCrossRef Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, et al. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:242–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcome of Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with High Operative Risk
Authors
Jensen T. C. Poon, MS, FRCSEd (Gen.)
Wai-Lun Law, MS, FRCS (Edin), FACS
Lorraine C. Y. Chow, MBBS
Joe K. M. Fan, MS, FRCSEd (Gen.)
Siu-Hung Lo, MBBS, FRCSEd (Gen.)
Publication date
01-07-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1530-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2011 Go to the issue