Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

Quality Measurement in Cancer Care Delivery

Authors: Nabil Wasif, MD, Janice N. Cormier, MD, Clifford Y. Ko, MD, Laurence E. McCahill, MD, Stephen B. Edge, MD, Sandra L. Wong, MD, Thomas Anthony, MD, Daniel Kollmorgen, MD, Stuart G. Marcus, MD, Aaron Bleznak, MD, Stanley P. L. Leong, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

During the past decade, increasing emphasis has been placed on defining and measuring the quality of health care delivery. The Outcomes Committee of the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) was established in 2008 to explore and promote emerging outcomes-related topics that are most relevant to society membership. In recognition of the importance of health care quality, a mini-symposium was held at the SSO’s 63rd Annual Cancer Symposium in St. Louis, Missouri, in March 2010. The primary objective of the symposium was to define what constitutes quality measurement in cancer care. This article presents an overview of the symposium proceedings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hewitt MSJ. Ensuring quality cancer care. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1999. Hewitt MSJ. Ensuring quality cancer care. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
2.
go back to reference Wennberg JE. The surgical treatment of common diseases. The Darthmouth Atlas of Health Care. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Publishing, Inc.; 1998. Wennberg JE. The surgical treatment of common diseases. The Darthmouth Atlas of Health Care. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Publishing, Inc.; 1998.
3.
go back to reference Ayanian JZ, Chrischilles EA, Fletcher RH, et al. Understanding cancer treatment and outcomes: the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(15):2992–6.PubMedCrossRef Ayanian JZ, Chrischilles EA, Fletcher RH, et al. Understanding cancer treatment and outcomes: the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(15):2992–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Oliver A, Greenberg CC. Measuring outcomes in oncology treatment: the importance of patient-centered outcomes. Surg Clin North Am. 2009;89(1):17–25, vii.PubMedCrossRef Oliver A, Greenberg CC. Measuring outcomes in oncology treatment: the importance of patient-centered outcomes. Surg Clin North Am. 2009;89(1):17–25, vii.PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Lohr KN, Donaldson MS, Harris-Wehling J. Medicare: a strategy for quality assurance, V: quality of care in a changing health care environment. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18(4):120–6.PubMed Lohr KN, Donaldson MS, Harris-Wehling J. Medicare: a strategy for quality assurance, V: quality of care in a changing health care environment. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18(4):120–6.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(4):626–32.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(4):626–32.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):777–83.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):777–83.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2117–27.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2117–27.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wilke LG, Ballman KV, McCall LM, et al. Adherence to the National Quality Forum (NQF) breast cancer measures within cancer clinical trials: a review from ACOSOG Z0010. Ann Surg Oncol. 17(8):1989–94. Wilke LG, Ballman KV, McCall LM, et al. Adherence to the National Quality Forum (NQF) breast cancer measures within cancer clinical trials: a review from ACOSOG Z0010. Ann Surg Oncol. 17(8):1989–94.
14.
go back to reference McCahill LE, Privette A, James T, et al. Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons. Arch Surg. 2009;144(5):455–62; discussion 462–3.PubMedCrossRef McCahill LE, Privette A, James T, et al. Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons. Arch Surg. 2009;144(5):455–62; discussion 462–3.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Neuss MN, Desch CE, McNiff KK, et al. A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(25):6233–9.PubMedCrossRef Neuss MN, Desch CE, McNiff KK, et al. A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(25):6233–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Lillemoe KD, et al. Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(12):848–59.PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Lillemoe KD, et al. Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(12):848–59.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Raval MV, Bentrem DJ, et al. National assessment of melanoma care using formally developed quality indicators. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(32):5445–51.PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Raval MV, Bentrem DJ, et al. National assessment of melanoma care using formally developed quality indicators. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(32):5445–51.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90.PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Carter A, Chiappetta V, Delev A, et al. Grasping the essentials of CP3R. J Registry Manag. 2009;36(3):92–4.PubMed Carter A, Chiappetta V, Delev A, et al. Grasping the essentials of CP3R. J Registry Manag. 2009;36(3):92–4.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Aiello Bowles EJ, Tuzzio L, Wiese CJ, et al. Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives. Cancer. 2008;112(4):934–42.PubMedCrossRef Aiello Bowles EJ, Tuzzio L, Wiese CJ, et al. Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives. Cancer. 2008;112(4):934–42.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wong SL, McCahill LE, Edge SB, et al. Getting to better cancer care: results of a society of surgical oncology survey. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(9):2363–71.PubMedCrossRef Wong SL, McCahill LE, Edge SB, et al. Getting to better cancer care: results of a society of surgical oncology survey. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(9):2363–71.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quality Measurement in Cancer Care Delivery
Authors
Nabil Wasif, MD
Janice N. Cormier, MD
Clifford Y. Ko, MD
Laurence E. McCahill, MD
Stephen B. Edge, MD
Sandra L. Wong, MD
Thomas Anthony, MD
Daniel Kollmorgen, MD
Stuart G. Marcus, MD
Aaron Bleznak, MD
Stanley P. L. Leong, MD
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1513-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2011 Go to the issue