Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Urologic Oncology

Impact of Surgical Experience on In-Hospital Complication Rates in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Prostatectomy: A Population-Based Study

Authors: Lars Budäus, MD, Maxine Sun, BSc, Firas Abdollah, MD, Kevin C. Zorn, MD, Monica Morgan, MD, Rupinder Johal, MD, Daniel Liberman, MD, Rodolphe Thuret, MD, Hendrik Isbarn, MD, Georg Salomon, MD, Alexander Haese, MD, Francesco Montorsi, MD, Shahrokh F. Shariat, MD, Paul Perrotte, MD, Markus Graefen, MD, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The relationship between provider volume and complication and transfusion rates in patients undergoing minimally invasive prostatectomy (MIRP) for prostate cancer has not been assessed. Temporal trends in MIRP annual surgical caseload (AC), impact of MIRP surgical experience (SE), and in-hospital complication and transfusion rates were evaluated.

Methods

Between 2002 and 2008, 2,666 patients in Florida underwent MIRP. Surgical experience was defined as the number of procedures performed from the beginning of the study until each individual MIRP. Multivariable logistic regression models using generalized estimating equations assessed the relationship between SE and in-hospital complication and transfusion rates.

Results

Overall AC and SE ranged from 1–171 and 1–500, respectively. Between 2002 and 2005, 94–100% of surgeons were considered as low AC tertile (≤15 MIRP) vs. 76–82% between 2006 and 2008. For the same time periods, low AC tertile surgeons performed 46–100 and 27–32% of all MIRPs respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models revealed 51 and 68% lower complication rates in patients operated on by surgeons of intermediate (17–76 MIRPs) and high SE (≥77 MIRPs) relative to surgeons of low SE (≤16 MIRPs). Similarly, transfusion rates were 80 and 83% lower for the same groups.

Conclusions

Our study is the first to indicate that high SE reduces MIRP complication and transfusion rates. Despite this observation, even in the most contemporary study year, most MIRP surgeons (82%) were in the low AC tertile and contributed to as many as 32% of all MIRPs. These findings should be considered at informed consent.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(14):2278–84.PubMedCrossRef Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(14):2278–84.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cropper CM. The robot is in—and ready to operate. Business Week. 2005(March 14):110–2. Cropper CM. The robot is in—and ready to operate. Business Week. 2005(March 14):110–2.
3.
go back to reference Shikanov SA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;74(3):619–23.PubMedCrossRef Shikanov SA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;74(3):619–23.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int. 2007;99(5):1109–12.PubMedCrossRef Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int. 2007;99(5):1109–12.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Novara G, Ficarra V, D’Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57(3):363–70.PubMedCrossRef Novara G, Ficarra V, D’Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57(3):363–70.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28(1):189–202.PubMedCrossRef Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28(1):189–202.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1557–64.PubMedCrossRef Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1557–64.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Agency_for_Health_Care_Administration_State_Center_for_Health_Statistics. Hysterectomy hospitalizations 1993–2002. Health Outcome Series. 2004:5. Agency_for_Health_Care_Administration_State_Center_for_Health_Statistics. Hysterectomy hospitalizations 1993–2002. Health Outcome Series. 2004:5.
10.
go back to reference Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(10):1075–9; discussion 1081–90. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(10):1075–9; discussion 1081–90.
11.
go back to reference Joudi FN, Allareddy V, Kane CJ, Konety BR. Analysis of complications following partial and total nephrectomy for renal cancer in a population based sample. J Urol. 2007;177(5):1709–14.PubMedCrossRef Joudi FN, Allareddy V, Kane CJ, Konety BR. Analysis of complications following partial and total nephrectomy for renal cancer in a population based sample. J Urol. 2007;177(5):1709–14.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1138–44.PubMedCrossRef Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1138–44.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Panageas KS, Schrag D, Riedel E, Bach PB, Begg CB. The effect of clustering of outcomes on the association of procedure volume and surgical outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(8):658–65.PubMed Panageas KS, Schrag D, Riedel E, Bach PB, Begg CB. The effect of clustering of outcomes on the association of procedure volume and surgical outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(8):658–65.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1037–63.PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1037–63.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(25):1364–9.PubMedCrossRef Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(25):1364–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hu JC, Gold KF, Pashos CL, Mehta SS, Litwin MS. Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(3):401–5.PubMedCrossRef Hu JC, Gold KF, Pashos CL, Mehta SS, Litwin MS. Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(3):401–5.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Alibhai SM, Leach M, Tomlinson G. Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on mortality and complications after prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180(1):155–62; discussion 162–3.PubMedCrossRef Alibhai SM, Leach M, Tomlinson G. Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on mortality and complications after prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180(1):155–62; discussion 162–3.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Konety BR, Dhawan V, Allareddy V, Joslyn SA. Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality from radical cystectomy: data from the health care utilization project. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1695–700.PubMedCrossRef Konety BR, Dhawan V, Allareddy V, Joslyn SA. Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality from radical cystectomy: data from the health care utilization project. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1695–700.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111(5):518–26.PubMed Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111(5):518–26.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Graefen M. The modified Clavien system: a plea for a standardized reporting system for surgical complications. Eur Urol. 2010;57:387–9.PubMedCrossRef Graefen M. The modified Clavien system: a plea for a standardized reporting system for surgical complications. Eur Urol. 2010;57:387–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mitchell RE, Lee BT, Cookson MS, et al. Immediate surgical outcomes for radical prostatectomy in the University Health System Consortium Clinical Data Base: the impact of hospital case volume, hospital size and geographical region on 48,000 patients. BJU Int. 2009;104(10):1442–5.PubMedCrossRef Mitchell RE, Lee BT, Cookson MS, et al. Immediate surgical outcomes for radical prostatectomy in the University Health System Consortium Clinical Data Base: the impact of hospital case volume, hospital size and geographical region on 48,000 patients. BJU Int. 2009;104(10):1442–5.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Peterson LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med Care. 2000;38(8):785–95.PubMedCrossRef Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Peterson LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med Care. 2000;38(8):785–95.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bianco FJ Jr, Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, et al. Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;183:977–82. Bianco FJ Jr, Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, et al. Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;183:977–82.
Metadata
Title
Impact of Surgical Experience on In-Hospital Complication Rates in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Prostatectomy: A Population-Based Study
Authors
Lars Budäus, MD
Maxine Sun, BSc
Firas Abdollah, MD
Kevin C. Zorn, MD
Monica Morgan, MD
Rupinder Johal, MD
Daniel Liberman, MD
Rodolphe Thuret, MD
Hendrik Isbarn, MD
Georg Salomon, MD
Alexander Haese, MD
Francesco Montorsi, MD
Shahrokh F. Shariat, MD
Paul Perrotte, MD
Markus Graefen, MD
Pierre I. Karakiewicz, MD
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1300-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2011 Go to the issue