Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2010

01-07-2010 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Survival Analysis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Resection

Authors: Seong Yeon Cho, MD, Sang-Jae Park, MD, PhD, Seong Hoon Kim, MD, Sung-Sik Han, MD, Young-Kyu Kim, MD, Kwang-Woong Lee, MD, Soon-Ae Lee, MD, Eun Kyung Hong, MD, Woo Jin Lee, MD, Sang Myung Woo, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy, but the studies for the outcome after resection of ICC are rare. The aim of this study was to elucidate outcomes and prognostic factors of ICC in patients undergoing hepatic resection.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted with a total of 63 patients who underwent surgical resection with curative intent for ICC. We performed the survival analysis with preoperative and postoperative clinicopathologic factors according to the clinical outcome.

Results

The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 68.2, 50.5, and 31.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that patient’s old age, high preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, major vessel invasion, T classification, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, intrahepatic metastasis, and narrow resection margin were statistically significant. By multivariate analysis, patient’s old age, high preoperative CA19-9 level, lymphatic invasion, and narrow resection margin were independent dismal prognostic factors. The preoperative CA19-9 level shows a significant correlation with some histopathologic factors including major vessel invasion, bile duct invasion, and perineural invasion.

Conclusions

Preoperative CA19-9 level was a valuable clinical factor for predicting histopathologic invasiveness as well as clinical outcome. An adequate resection margin was the only modifiable factor by a surgeon during hepatic resection for ICC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Casavilla FA, Marsh JW, Iwatsuki S, et al. Hepatic resection and transplantation for peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:429–36.PubMed Casavilla FA, Marsh JW, Iwatsuki S, et al. Hepatic resection and transplantation for peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:429–36.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Aishima S, Kuroda Y, Nishihara Y, et al. Proposal of progression model for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathologic differences between hilar type and peripheral type. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1059–67.CrossRefPubMed Aishima S, Kuroda Y, Nishihara Y, et al. Proposal of progression model for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathologic differences between hilar type and peripheral type. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1059–67.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Roayaie S, Guarrera JV, Ye MQ, et al. Aggressive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: predictors of outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:365–72.CrossRefPubMed Roayaie S, Guarrera JV, Ye MQ, et al. Aggressive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: predictors of outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:365–72.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chou FF, Sheen-Chen SM, Chen CL, et al. Prognostic factors of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1995;59:40–4.CrossRefPubMed Chou FF, Sheen-Chen SM, Chen CL, et al. Prognostic factors of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1995;59:40–4.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nakagohri T, Asano T, Kinoshita H, et al. Aggressive surgical resection for hilar-invasive and peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2003;27:289–93.CrossRefPubMed Nakagohri T, Asano T, Kinoshita H, et al. Aggressive surgical resection for hilar-invasive and peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2003;27:289–93.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Taoka H, et al. Clinicopathological features and outcome of hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6:108–16.CrossRefPubMed Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Taoka H, et al. Clinicopathological features and outcome of hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6:108–16.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Fruhauf NR, et al. Extended hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC): when is it worthwhile? Single center experience with 27 resections in 50 patients over a 5-year period. Ann Surg. 2005;241:134–43.PubMed Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Fruhauf NR, et al. Extended hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC): when is it worthwhile? Single center experience with 27 resections in 50 patients over a 5-year period. Ann Surg. 2005;241:134–43.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Uenishi T, Hirohashi K, Kubo S, et al. Histologic factors affecting prognosis following hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2001;25:865–9.CrossRefPubMed Uenishi T, Hirohashi K, Kubo S, et al. Histologic factors affecting prognosis following hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2001;25:865–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Patel T. Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology. 2001;33:1353–7.CrossRefPubMed Patel T. Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology. 2001;33:1353–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference El Rassi ZE, Partensky C, Scoazec JY, et al. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: presentation, diagnosis, pathology and management. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:375–80.CrossRefPubMed El Rassi ZE, Partensky C, Scoazec JY, et al. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: presentation, diagnosis, pathology and management. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:375–80.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Suzuki H, Isaji S, Pairojkul C, Uttaravichien T. Comparative clinicopathological study of resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in northeast Thailand and Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7:206–11.CrossRefPubMed Suzuki H, Isaji S, Pairojkul C, Uttaravichien T. Comparative clinicopathological study of resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in northeast Thailand and Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7:206–11.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sirica AE GT, Harrell MB, Caran N. Cholangiocarcinogenesis and biliary adaptation responses in hepatic injury. In: Sirica AE, Longnecker DS, eds. Biliary and Pancreatic Ductal Epithelia—Pathobiology and Pathophysiology. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997:229–90. Sirica AE GT, Harrell MB, Caran N. Cholangiocarcinogenesis and biliary adaptation responses in hepatic injury. In: Sirica AE, Longnecker DS, eds. Biliary and Pancreatic Ductal EpitheliaPathobiology and Pathophysiology. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997:229–90.
13.
go back to reference Chu KM, Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST. Malignancy associated with hepatolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:352–7.PubMed Chu KM, Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST. Malignancy associated with hepatolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:352–7.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ponsioen CI, Tytgat GN. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a clinical review. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:515–23.CrossRefPubMed Ponsioen CI, Tytgat GN. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a clinical review. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:515–23.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jan YY, Chen HM, Chen MF. Malignancy in choledochal cysts. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:100–3.PubMed Jan YY, Chen HM, Chen MF. Malignancy in choledochal cysts. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:100–3.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Madariaga JR, Iwatsuki S, Todo S, et al. Liver resection for hilar and peripheral cholangiocarcinomas: a study of 62 cases. Ann Surg. 1998;227:70–9.CrossRefPubMed Madariaga JR, Iwatsuki S, Todo S, et al. Liver resection for hilar and peripheral cholangiocarcinomas: a study of 62 cases. Ann Surg. 1998;227:70–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, et al. Clinical impact of the surgical margin status in hepatectomy for solitary mass-forming type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma without lymph node metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:160–5.CrossRefPubMed Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, et al. Clinical impact of the surgical margin status in hepatectomy for solitary mass-forming type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma without lymph node metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:160–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Inoue K, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, et al. Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of mass-forming type cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2000;127:498–505.CrossRefPubMed Inoue K, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, et al. Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of mass-forming type cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2000;127:498–505.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Isa T, Kusano T, Shimoji H, et al. Predictive factors for long-term survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2001;181:507–11.CrossRefPubMed Isa T, Kusano T, Shimoji H, et al. Predictive factors for long-term survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2001;181:507–11.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jan YY, Yeh CN, Yeh TS, Chen TC. Prognostic analysis of surgical treatment of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: two decades of experience at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:1779–84.PubMed Jan YY, Yeh CN, Yeh TS, Chen TC. Prognostic analysis of surgical treatment of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: two decades of experience at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:1779–84.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Ohtsuka M, Ito H, Kimura F, et al. Results of surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and clinicopathological factors influencing survival. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1525–31.CrossRefPubMed Ohtsuka M, Ito H, Kimura F, et al. Results of surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and clinicopathological factors influencing survival. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1525–31.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Puhalla H, Schuell B, Pokorny H, et al. Treatment and outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005;189:173–7.CrossRefPubMed Puhalla H, Schuell B, Pokorny H, et al. Treatment and outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005;189:173–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Suh KS, Roh HR, Koh YT, et al. Clinicopathologic features of the intraductal growth type of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 2000;31:12–7.CrossRefPubMed Suh KS, Roh HR, Koh YT, et al. Clinicopathologic features of the intraductal growth type of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 2000;31:12–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ohashi K, Nakajima Y, Tsutsumi M, et al. Clinical characteristics and proliferating activity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1994;9:442–6.CrossRefPubMed Ohashi K, Nakajima Y, Tsutsumi M, et al. Clinical characteristics and proliferating activity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1994;9:442–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ercolani G, Grazi GL, Ravaioli M, et al. The role of lymphadenectomy for liver tumors: further considerations on the appropriateness of treatment strategy. Ann Surg. 2004;239:202–9.CrossRefPubMed Ercolani G, Grazi GL, Ravaioli M, et al. The role of lymphadenectomy for liver tumors: further considerations on the appropriateness of treatment strategy. Ann Surg. 2004;239:202–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Shimada M, Yamashita Y, Aishima S, et al. Value of lymph node dissection during resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1463–6.CrossRefPubMed Shimada M, Yamashita Y, Aishima S, et al. Value of lymph node dissection during resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1463–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Nakagawa T, Kamiyama T, Kurauchi N, et al. Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2005;29:728–33.CrossRefPubMed Nakagawa T, Kamiyama T, Kurauchi N, et al. Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2005;29:728–33.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Yeh CN, Jan YY, Chen MF. Influence of age on surgical treatment of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2004;187:559–63.CrossRefPubMed Yeh CN, Jan YY, Chen MF. Influence of age on surgical treatment of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2004;187:559–63.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Patel AH, Harnois DM, Klee GG, et al. The utility of CA 19-9 in the diagnoses of cholangiocarcinoma in patients without primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:204–7.CrossRefPubMed Patel AH, Harnois DM, Klee GG, et al. The utility of CA 19-9 in the diagnoses of cholangiocarcinoma in patients without primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:204–7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Valverde A, Bonhomme N, Farges O, et al. Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a Western experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6:122–7.CrossRefPubMed Valverde A, Bonhomme N, Farges O, et al. Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a Western experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999;6:122–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Cherqui D, Tantawi B, Alon R, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Results of aggressive surgical management. Arch Surg. 1995;130:1073–8.PubMed Cherqui D, Tantawi B, Alon R, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Results of aggressive surgical management. Arch Surg. 1995;130:1073–8.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Survival Analysis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Resection
Authors
Seong Yeon Cho, MD
Sang-Jae Park, MD, PhD
Seong Hoon Kim, MD
Sung-Sik Han, MD
Young-Kyu Kim, MD
Kwang-Woong Lee, MD
Soon-Ae Lee, MD
Eun Kyung Hong, MD
Woo Jin Lee, MD
Sang Myung Woo, MD
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2010
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0938-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2010

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2010 Go to the issue