Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2008

01-08-2008 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Comparison of Central and Extended Left Pancreatectomy for Lesions of the Pancreatic Neck

Authors: Lee M. Ocuin, MD, Juan M. Sarmiento, MD, Charles A. Staley, MD, John R. Galloway, MD, Colin D. Johnson, MD, William C. Wood, MD, David A. Kooby, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Central pancreatectomy (CP) is a parenchyma-sparing alternative to extended left pancreatectomy (ELP) for tumors of the pancreatic neck. We compared short- and long-term outcomes for the two approaches.

Methods

Patients who underwent CP or ELP from 2000–2007 for neoplasms of the neck were identified. Charts were reviewed for patient, treatment, and outcome data. Long-term and quality-of-life (QoL) data were gathered through Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved telephone interviews and questionnaires European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, and QLQ-PAN26.

Results

31 patients were identified; 13 underwent CP and 18 underwent ELP. Median follow-up was 29 months (range 5–90). Groups did not differ in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, or preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM). CP patients had less gland resected (5.7 ± 2.1 cm versus 10.8 ± 2.8 cm) and lower postoperative mean blood glucose levels (120 ± 15 mg/dl versus 136 ± 24 mg/dl). CP patients experienced more complications (92% versus 39%), but no significant difference in major complications (38%, CP versus 17%, ELP; P = 0.17) or hospital stay (9 ± 3 days, CP versus 7.5 ± 4 days, ELP). There was one perioperative death in the CP group, unrelated to surgical technique. Questionnaire analysis showed no differences in functional or symptom scales. New-onset exocrine insufficiency was not significantly different between the groups (10%, CP versus 27%, ELP; P = 0.62), but the ELP group had a higher rate of new-onset DM (57% versus 11%; P = 0.04).

Conclusion

CP is associated with more complications than ELP, but no difference in long-term QoL. Due to the lower incidence of postoperative DM, CP can be recommended for healthy patients with indolent tumors of the pancreatic neck.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Crippa S, Bassi C, Warshaw AL, et al. Middle pancreatectomy: indications, short- and long-term operative outcomes. Ann Surg 2007; 246:69–76PubMedCrossRef Crippa S, Bassi C, Warshaw AL, et al. Middle pancreatectomy: indications, short- and long-term operative outcomes. Ann Surg 2007; 246:69–76PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Muller MW, Friess H, Kleeff J, et al. Middle segmental pancreatic resection: an option to treat benign pancreatic body lesions. Ann Surg 2006; 244:909–18; discussion 918–20PubMedCrossRef Muller MW, Friess H, Kleeff J, et al. Middle segmental pancreatic resection: an option to treat benign pancreatic body lesions. Ann Surg 2006; 244:909–18; discussion 918–20PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sauvanet A, Partensky C, Sastre B, et al. Medial pancreatectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 53 patients by the French Pancreas Club. Surgery 2002; 132:836–43PubMedCrossRef Sauvanet A, Partensky C, Sastre B, et al. Medial pancreatectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 53 patients by the French Pancreas Club. Surgery 2002; 132:836–43PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, Fernandez-del Castillo C, et al. Middle segment pancreatectomy: a novel technique for conserving pancreatic tissue. Arch Surg 1998; 133:327–31PubMedCrossRef Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, Fernandez-del Castillo C, et al. Middle segment pancreatectomy: a novel technique for conserving pancreatic tissue. Arch Surg 1998; 133:327–31PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Roggin KK, Rudloff U, Blumgart LH, et al. Central pancreatectomy revisited. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10:804–12PubMedCrossRef Roggin KK, Rudloff U, Blumgart LH, et al. Central pancreatectomy revisited. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10:804–12PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Martin RC, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002; 235:803–13 Martin RC, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002; 235:803–13
7.
go back to reference Kooby DA, Fong Y, Suriawinata A, et al. Impact of steatosis on perioperative outcome following hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:1034–44PubMedCrossRef Kooby DA, Fong Y, Suriawinata A, et al. Impact of steatosis on perioperative outcome following hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:1034–44PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240:205–13PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240:205–13PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:365–76PubMedCrossRef Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:365–76PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fitzsimmons D, Johnson CD, George S, et al. Development of a disease specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer QoL questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35:939–41 Fitzsimmons D, Johnson CD, George S, et al. Development of a disease specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer QoL questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35:939–41
12.
go back to reference Fernandez-del Castillo C, Targarona J, Thayer SP, et al. Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 2003; 138:427–33; discussion 433–4PubMedCrossRef Fernandez-del Castillo C, Targarona J, Thayer SP, et al. Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 2003; 138:427–33; discussion 433–4PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Allen PJ, D’Angelica M, Gonen M, et al. A selective approach to the resection of cystic lesions of the pancreas: results from 539 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2006; 244:572–82PubMed Allen PJ, D’Angelica M, Gonen M, et al. A selective approach to the resection of cystic lesions of the pancreas: results from 539 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2006; 244:572–82PubMed
14.
go back to reference Allen PJ, Jaques DP, D’Angelica M, et al. Cystic lesions of the pancreas: selection criteria for operative and nonoperative management in 209 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:970–7PubMedCrossRef Allen PJ, Jaques DP, D’Angelica M, et al. Cystic lesions of the pancreas: selection criteria for operative and nonoperative management in 209 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:970–7PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Balcom JHt, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, et al. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001; 136:391–8PubMedCrossRef Balcom JHt, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, et al. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001; 136:391–8PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lee CJ, Scheiman J, Anderson MA, et al. Risk of malignancy in resected cystic tumors of the pancreas ≤3 cm in size: is it safe to observe asymptomatic patients? A multi-institutional report. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12:234–42PubMedCrossRef Lee CJ, Scheiman J, Anderson MA, et al. Risk of malignancy in resected cystic tumors of the pancreas ≤3 cm in size: is it safe to observe asymptomatic patients? A multi-institutional report. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12:234–42PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Spinelli KS, Fromwiller TE, Daniel RA, et al. Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: observe or operate. Ann Surg 2004; 239:651–7; discussion 657–9PubMedCrossRef Spinelli KS, Fromwiller TE, Daniel RA, et al. Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: observe or operate. Ann Surg 2004; 239:651–7; discussion 657–9PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Walsh RM, Vogt DP, Henderson JM, et al. Natural history of indeterminate pancreatic cysts. Surgery 2005; 138:665–70; discussion 670–1PubMedCrossRef Walsh RM, Vogt DP, Henderson JM, et al. Natural history of indeterminate pancreatic cysts. Surgery 2005; 138:665–70; discussion 670–1PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Winter JM, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Periampullary and pancreatic incidentaloma: a single institution’s experience with an increasingly common diagnosis. Ann Surg 2006; 243:673–80; discussion 680–3PubMedCrossRef Winter JM, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Periampullary and pancreatic incidentaloma: a single institution’s experience with an increasingly common diagnosis. Ann Surg 2006; 243:673–80; discussion 680–3PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Brugge WR, Lauwers GY, Sahani D, et al. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1218–26PubMedCrossRef Brugge WR, Lauwers GY, Sahani D, et al. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1218–26PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Guillemin P, Bessot M. [Chronic calcifying pancreatitis in renal tuberculosis: pancreatojejunostomy using an original technic.]. Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 1957; 83:869–71 Guillemin P, Bessot M. [Chronic calcifying pancreatitis in renal tuberculosis: pancreatojejunostomy using an original technic.]. Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 1957; 83:869–71
22.
go back to reference Falconi M, Mantovani W, Crippa S, et al. Pancreatic insufficiency after different resections for benign tumours. Br J Surg 2008; 95:85–91PubMedCrossRef Falconi M, Mantovani W, Crippa S, et al. Pancreatic insufficiency after different resections for benign tumours. Br J Surg 2008; 95:85–91PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Falconi M, Mantovani W, Frigerio I, et al. [Intermediate resection and distal pancreatectomy for benign neoplasms of the pancreas: comparison of postoperative complications and costs]. Chir Ital 2001; 53:467–74PubMed Falconi M, Mantovani W, Frigerio I, et al. [Intermediate resection and distal pancreatectomy for benign neoplasms of the pancreas: comparison of postoperative complications and costs]. Chir Ital 2001; 53:467–74PubMed
24.
go back to reference Yamaguchi K, Yokohata K, Ohkido M, et al. Which is less invasive–distal pancreatectomy or segmental resection? Int Surg 2000; 85:297–302PubMed Yamaguchi K, Yokohata K, Ohkido M, et al. Which is less invasive–distal pancreatectomy or segmental resection? Int Surg 2000; 85:297–302PubMed
25.
go back to reference Pratt W, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10:1264–78; discussion 1278–9PubMedCrossRef Pratt W, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10:1264–78; discussion 1278–9PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lillemoe KD, Kaushal S, Cameron JL, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg 1999; 229:693–8; discussion 698–700PubMedCrossRef Lillemoe KD, Kaushal S, Cameron JL, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg 1999; 229:693–8; discussion 698–700PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’Graggen K, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 2007; 245:573–82PubMedCrossRef Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’Graggen K, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 2007; 245:573–82PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 2000; 232:419–29PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 2000; 232:419–29PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Allendorf JD, Schrope BA, Lauerman MH, et al. Postoperative glycemic control after central pancreatectomy for mid-gland lesions. World J Surg 2007; 31:164–8; discussion 169–70PubMedCrossRef Allendorf JD, Schrope BA, Lauerman MH, et al. Postoperative glycemic control after central pancreatectomy for mid-gland lesions. World J Surg 2007; 31:164–8; discussion 169–70PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Central and Extended Left Pancreatectomy for Lesions of the Pancreatic Neck
Authors
Lee M. Ocuin, MD
Juan M. Sarmiento, MD
Charles A. Staley, MD
John R. Galloway, MD
Colin D. Johnson, MD
William C. Wood, MD
David A. Kooby, MD
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9987-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2008 Go to the issue