Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2009

01-02-2009 | Breast Oncology

Breast Specimen Orientation

Authors: M. A. Molina, MD, S. Snell, MD, D. Franceschi, MD, M. Jorda, MD, PhD, C. Gomez, MD, F. L. Moffat, MD, J. Powell, MD, E. Avisar, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Lumpectomy specimens are commonly divided into six sides: superficial, deep, superior, inferior, medial, and lateral. Orienting stitches are placed on the specimen during surgery to allow reorientation by pathology. Despite those efforts, specimen disorientation may occur. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation in orientation between surgeons and pathologists. Lumpectomy specimens were routinely oriented. An additional Prolene suture was randomly placed by the surgeon on one side to be localized by pathology. The results were recorded and the disorientation rate calculated. Specimen size and presence of skin and/or muscle were also recorded. There were 122 lumpectomy specimens prospectively entered. Average specimen volume was 95.5 cm3. Twenty-four specimens had segments of skin or muscle. The additional sutures were evenly divided between the six sides. The overall disorientation rate was 31.1% (95% confidence interval, 23.1–40.2).The side-specific disorientation rates were 43%, 40%, 35%, 29%, 28%, and 14% for the deep, superficial, lateral, medial, superior, and inferior surfaces, respectively (no statistical difference). Presence of skin or muscle on the specimen did not contribute to better orientation. Specimen volumes, however, were highly associated with orientation. Specimens of <20 cm3 had a disorientation rate of 78%, while larger specimen had a disorientation rate of 20% (p < .001). Specimen orientation with stitches placed on two surfaces is associated with a high disorientation rate. Better orientation techniques are necessary to minimize the specimen disorientation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:822–8.PubMed Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:822–8.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Slavadori B, Luini A. Conservation treatment of early breast cancer: long-term results of 1,232 cases treated wit quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy. Ann Surg. 1990;211:250–9.PubMed Veronesi U, Slavadori B, Luini A. Conservation treatment of early breast cancer: long-term results of 1,232 cases treated wit quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy. Ann Surg. 1990;211:250–9.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, et al. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2003;57:979–85.CrossRef Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, et al. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2003;57:979–85.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gwin JL, Eisenberg BL, Hoffman JP, et al. Incidence of gross and microscopic carcinoma in specimens from patients with breast cancer after reexcision lumpectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:729–33.PubMedCrossRef Gwin JL, Eisenberg BL, Hoffman JP, et al. Incidence of gross and microscopic carcinoma in specimens from patients with breast cancer after reexcision lumpectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:729–33.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kearney TJ, Morrow M. Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995;2:303–7.PubMedCrossRef Kearney TJ, Morrow M. Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995;2:303–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and differences in the extend of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15 year survival. An overview of the randomized trial. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–106. Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and differences in the extend of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15 year survival. An overview of the randomized trial. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–106.
7.
go back to reference Fischer B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;17;347:1233–41.CrossRef Fischer B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;17;347:1233–41.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38:291–9.PubMed Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38:291–9.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Chagpar A, Yen T, Sahin A, et al. Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2003;186:371–7.PubMedCrossRef Chagpar A, Yen T, Sahin A, et al. Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2003;186:371–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:220–6.PubMedCrossRef Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:220–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg. 2005;71:22–8.PubMed Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg. 2005;71:22–8.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gibson GR, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, et al. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity reexcision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:693–704.PubMedCrossRef Gibson GR, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, et al. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity reexcision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:693–704.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hutson TL, Pigalarga R, Osborne MP, et al. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;192:509–12.CrossRef Hutson TL, Pigalarga R, Osborne MP, et al. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;192:509–12.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Breast Specimen Orientation
Authors
M. A. Molina, MD
S. Snell, MD
D. Franceschi, MD
M. Jorda, MD, PhD
C. Gomez, MD
F. L. Moffat, MD
J. Powell, MD
E. Avisar, MD
Publication date
01-02-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0245-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2009 Go to the issue