Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2009

01-03-2009 | Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

Readmissions Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreas Cancer: A Population-Based Appraisal

Authors: Irina Yermilov, David Bentrem, Evan Sekeris, Sushma Jain, Melinda A. Maggard, Clifford Y. Ko, James S. Tomlinson

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Procedure complexity and volume–outcome relationships have led to increased regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreas cancer. Knowledge regarding outcomes after PD comes from single-institutional series, which may be limited if a significant number of patients follow up at other hospitals. Thus, readmission data may be underreported. This study utilizes a population-based data set to examine readmission data following PD. California Cancer Registry (1994–2003) was linked to the California’s Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database; patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who had undergone PD, excluding perioperative (30-day) mortality, were identified. All hospital readmissions within 1 year following PD were analyzed with respect to timing, location, and reason for readmission. Our cohort included 2,023 patients who underwent PD for pancreas cancer. Fifty-nine percent were readmitted within 1 year following PD and 47% were readmitted to a secondary hospital. Readmission was associated with worse median survival compared with those not readmitted (10.5 versus 22 months, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that increasing T-stage, age, and comorbidities were associated with increased likelihood of readmission. Diagnoses associated with high rates of readmission included progression of disease (24%), surgery-related complications (14%), and infection (13%). Diabetes (1.4%) and pain (1.5%) were associated with low rates of readmission. We found a readmission rate of 59%, which is much higher than previously reported by single institutional series. Concordantly, nearly half of patients readmitted were readmitted to a secondary hospital. Common reasons for readmission included progression of disease, surgical complications, and infection. These findings should assist in both anticipating and facilitating postoperative care as well as managing patient expectations. This study utilizes a novel population-based database to evaluate incidence, timing, location, and reasons for readmission within 1 year following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Fifty-nine percent of patients were readmitted within 1 year after pancreaticoduodenectomy and 47% were readmitted to a secondary hospital.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1199–210; discussion 1210–1191.PubMedCrossRef Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1199–210; discussion 1210–1191.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schniewind B, Bestmann B, Henne-Bruns D, Faendrich F, Kremer B, Kuechler T. Quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1099–107.PubMedCrossRef Schniewind B, Bestmann B, Henne-Bruns D, Faendrich F, Kremer B, Kuechler T. Quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1099–107.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2005;138:618–28; discussion 628–30.PubMedCrossRef Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2005;138:618–28; discussion 628–30.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brennan MF, Kattan MW, Klimstra D, Conlon K. Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 2004;240:293–8.PubMedCrossRef Brennan MF, Kattan MW, Klimstra D, Conlon K. Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 2004;240:293–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Balcom JHt, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001;136:391–8.PubMedCrossRef Balcom JHt, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001;136:391–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schmidt CM, Powell ES, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients. Arch Surg. 2004;139:718–25; discussion 725–717.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt CM, Powell ES, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients. Arch Surg. 2004;139:718–25; discussion 725–717.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:52–60.PubMedCrossRef Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:52–60.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Buchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2004;91:586–94.PubMedCrossRef Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Buchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2004;91:586–94.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:356–64.PubMedCrossRef Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:356–64.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference De Oliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:931–7; discussion 937–9.CrossRef De Oliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:931–7; discussion 937–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kazanjian KK, Hines OJ, Eibl G, Reber HA. Management of pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 437 consecutive patients. Arch Surg. 2005;140:849–54; discussion 854–846.PubMedCrossRef Kazanjian KK, Hines OJ, Eibl G, Reber HA. Management of pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 437 consecutive patients. Arch Surg. 2005;140:849–54; discussion 854–846.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Satoi S, Takai S, Matsui Y, et al. Less morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy of patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2006;33:45–52.PubMedCrossRef Satoi S, Takai S, Matsui Y, et al. Less morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy of patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2006;33:45–52.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006;244:10–5.PubMedCrossRef Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006;244:10–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY, et al. Multimodality therapy for pancreatic cancer in the U.S.: utilization, outcomes, and the effect of hospital volume. Cancer. 2007;110:1227–34.PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY, et al. Multimodality therapy for pancreatic cancer in the U.S.: utilization, outcomes, and the effect of hospital volume. Cancer. 2007;110:1227–34.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245:777–83.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245:777–83.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg. 2005;242:540–4; discussion 544–7.PubMed Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg. 2005;242:540–4; discussion 544–7.PubMed
18.
go back to reference van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, de Wit LT, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Readmissions after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1467–71.PubMedCrossRef van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, de Wit LT, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Readmissions after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1467–71.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Emick DM, Riall TS, Cameron JL, et al. Hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1243–52; discussion 1252–1243.PubMedCrossRef Emick DM, Riall TS, Cameron JL, et al. Hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1243–52; discussion 1252–1243.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Perkins AJ, Kroenke K, Unutzer J, et al. Common comorbidity scales were similar in their ability to predict health care costs and mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1040–8.PubMedCrossRef Perkins AJ, Kroenke K, Unutzer J, et al. Common comorbidity scales were similar in their ability to predict health care costs and mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1040–8.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brescia FJ. Palliative care in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Control. 2004;11:39–45.PubMed Brescia FJ. Palliative care in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Control. 2004;11:39–45.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Nathan H, Pawlik TM. Limitations of claims and registry data in surgical oncology research. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:415–23.PubMedCrossRef Nathan H, Pawlik TM. Limitations of claims and registry data in surgical oncology research. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:415–23.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Readmissions Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreas Cancer: A Population-Based Appraisal
Authors
Irina Yermilov
David Bentrem
Evan Sekeris
Sushma Jain
Melinda A. Maggard
Clifford Y. Ko
James S. Tomlinson
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0178-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2009 Go to the issue