Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2007

01-05-2007 | Breast Oncology

A Phase II Trial of Image-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Invasive Breast Carcinomas: Use of Saline-Cooled Tip Electrode

Authors: Vijay P. Khatri, MD, FACS, John P. McGahan, MD, Rajendra Ramsamooj, MD, Stephen Griffey, DVM, John Brock, Michael Cronan, Stephen Wilkendorf

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Local ablative therapy of breast cancer represents the next frontier in the evolution of minimally-invasive breast conservation therapy. We performed this Phase II trial to determine the efficacy and safety of Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of small invasive breast carcinomas.

Methods

Seventeen patients with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer, ≤ 1.5 cm in diameter were enrolled in this trial. Under ultrasound guidance, the tumor and a 5 mm margin of surrounding breast tissue were ablated with saline-cooled RF electrode followed by surgical resection. Pathologic and immunohistochemical stains were performed to assess tumor viability. We examined whether loss of ER, PR receptor and pancytokeratin expression following RF ablation would correlate with non-viability.

Results

Fifteen patients completed the treatment. The mean tumor size was 1.28 cm. The mean ablation time was 21 minutes using a mean power of 35.5 watts. During ablation, the tumors became progressively echogenic that corresponded with the region of severe electrocautery injury at pathological examination. Of the 15 treated patients, NADPH viability staining was available for 14 patients and in 13 (92.8%), there was no evidence of viable malignant cells. ER, PR expression and pancytokeratin immunohistochemistry analysis were unreliable surrogates for determining non-viability. Following RF ablation, 2 patients developed skin puckering.

Conclusions

RF ablation is a promising minimally invasive treatment of small breast carcinomas, as it can achieve effective cell killing with a low complication rate. Further research is necessary to optimize this image-guided technique and evaluate its future role as the sole local therapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fisher B. From Halsted to prevention and beyond: advances in the management of breast cancer during the twentieth century. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35(14):1963–73PubMedCrossRef Fisher B. From Halsted to prevention and beyond: advances in the management of breast cancer during the twentieth century. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35(14):1963–73PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15(6):2345–50PubMed Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15(6):2345–50PubMed
3.
go back to reference Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, et al. The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs. no boost’ trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. Radiother Oncol 2000; 55(3):219–32PubMedCrossRef Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, et al. The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs. no boost’ trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. Radiother Oncol 2000; 55(3):219–32PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Singletary SE. Minimally invasive techniques in breast cancer treatment. Semin Surg Oncol 2001; 20(3):246–50PubMedCrossRef Singletary SE. Minimally invasive techniques in breast cancer treatment. Semin Surg Oncol 2001; 20(3):246–50PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cady B, Stone MD, Schuler JG, et al. The new era in breast cancer. Invasion, size, and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening. Arch Surg 1996; 131(3):301–8PubMed Cady B, Stone MD, Schuler JG, et al. The new era in breast cancer. Invasion, size, and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening. Arch Surg 1996; 131(3):301–8PubMed
6.
go back to reference McGahan JP, Griffey SM, Schneider PD, et al. Radio-frequency electrocautery ablation of mammary tissue in swine. Radiology 2000; 217(2):471–6PubMed McGahan JP, Griffey SM, Schneider PD, et al. Radio-frequency electrocautery ablation of mammary tissue in swine. Radiology 2000; 217(2):471–6PubMed
7.
go back to reference Park JK, Halperin BD, Kron J, et al. Analysis of body surface area as a determinant of impedance during radiofrequency catheter ablation in adults and children. J Electrocardiol 1994; 27(4):329–32PubMedCrossRef Park JK, Halperin BD, Kron J, et al. Analysis of body surface area as a determinant of impedance during radiofrequency catheter ablation in adults and children. J Electrocardiol 1994; 27(4):329–32PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wang D, Hulse JE, Walsh EP, Saul JP. Factors influencing impedance during radiofrequency ablation in humans. Chin Med J (Engl) 1995; 108(6):450–5 Wang D, Hulse JE, Walsh EP, Saul JP. Factors influencing impedance during radiofrequency ablation in humans. Chin Med J (Engl) 1995; 108(6):450–5
9.
go back to reference Izzo F, Thomas R, Delrio P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in patients with primary breast carcinoma: a pilot study in 26 patients. Cancer 2001; 92(8):2036–44PubMedCrossRef Izzo F, Thomas R, Delrio P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in patients with primary breast carcinoma: a pilot study in 26 patients. Cancer 2001; 92(8):2036–44PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fornage BD, Sneige N, Ross MI, et al. Small ( < or = 2-cm) breast cancer treated with US-guided radiofrequency ablation: feasibility study. Radiology 2004; 231(1):215–24PubMedCrossRef Fornage BD, Sneige N, Ross MI, et al. Small ( < or = 2-cm) breast cancer treated with US-guided radiofrequency ablation: feasibility study. Radiology 2004; 231(1):215–24PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Burak WE Jr, Agnese DM, Povoski SP, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of invasive breast carcinoma followed by delayed surgical excision. Cancer 2003; 98(7):1369–76PubMedCrossRef Burak WE Jr, Agnese DM, Povoski SP, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of invasive breast carcinoma followed by delayed surgical excision. Cancer 2003; 98(7):1369–76PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dowlatshahi K, Fan M, Gould VE. Stereotactically guided laser therapy of occult breast tumors. Work in progress report. Arch Surg 2000; 135:1345–52 Dowlatshahi K, Fan M, Gould VE. Stereotactically guided laser therapy of occult breast tumors. Work in progress report. Arch Surg 2000; 135:1345–52
13.
go back to reference Sabel MS, Kaufman CS, Whitworth P, et al. Cryoablation of early-stage breast cancer: work-in-progress report of a multi-institutional trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11(5):542–9PubMedCrossRef Sabel MS, Kaufman CS, Whitworth P, et al. Cryoablation of early-stage breast cancer: work-in-progress report of a multi-institutional trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11(5):542–9PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Raman SS, Lu DS, Vodopich DJ, et al. Creation of radiofrequency lesions in a porcine model: correlation with sonography, CT, and histopathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175(5):1253–8PubMed Raman SS, Lu DS, Vodopich DJ, et al. Creation of radiofrequency lesions in a porcine model: correlation with sonography, CT, and histopathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175(5):1253–8PubMed
15.
go back to reference Brookes JA, Redpath TW, Gilbert FJ, et al. Accuracy of T1 measurement in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using two- and three-dimensional variable flip angle fast low-angle shot. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9(2):163–71PubMedCrossRef Brookes JA, Redpath TW, Gilbert FJ, et al. Accuracy of T1 measurement in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using two- and three-dimensional variable flip angle fast low-angle shot. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9(2):163–71PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tafra L, Cheng Z, Uddo J, et al. Pilot clinical trial of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer. Am J Surg 2005; 190(4):628–32PubMedCrossRef Tafra L, Cheng Z, Uddo J, et al. Pilot clinical trial of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer. Am J Surg 2005; 190(4):628–32PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jan ML, Chuang KS, Chen GW, et al. A three-dimensional registration method for automated fusion of micro PET-CT-SPECT whole-body images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24(7):886–93PubMedCrossRef Jan ML, Chuang KS, Chen GW, et al. A three-dimensional registration method for automated fusion of micro PET-CT-SPECT whole-body images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24(7):886–93PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002; 184(5):383–93PubMedCrossRef Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002; 184(5):383–93PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Phase II Trial of Image-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Invasive Breast Carcinomas: Use of Saline-Cooled Tip Electrode
Authors
Vijay P. Khatri, MD, FACS
John P. McGahan, MD
Rajendra Ramsamooj, MD
Stephen Griffey, DVM
John Brock
Michael Cronan
Stephen Wilkendorf
Publication date
01-05-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9315-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2007 Go to the issue