Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2007

01-05-2007

Carcinoid of the Rectum Risk Stratification (CaRRs): A Strategy for Preoperative Outcome Assessment

Authors: Bridget N. Fahy, Laura H. Tang, David Klimstra, W. Douglas Wong, Jose G. Guillem, Philip B. Paty, Larissa K. F. Temple, Jinru Shia, Martin R. Weiser

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Predicting rectal carcinoid behavior based exclusively on tumor size is imprecise. We sought to identify factors associated with outcome and incorporate them into a pre-operative risk stratification scheme.

Methods

Seventy rectal carcinoid patients evaluated at our institution were identified. Demographic, clinical, and histopathologic data were collected and correlated with recurrence and survival.

Results

The mean age of our cohort was 53.6 years. Fifty-seven percent of patients were female. The mean tumor size was 1.3 cm (range: 0.1–5 cm). Twenty-five percent of patients had deeply invasive tumors (into the muscularis propria or deeper); an equal percentage had tumors with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or an elevated mitotic rate (≥2/50 HPF). Eleven patients (17%) had distant metastases at presentation. Sixty-one patients were followed for a median of 22 months (2–308 months), during which seven patients developed recurrence and seven died of disease (2/7 who developed recurrence). Poor outcome was associated with large tumor size, deep invasion, presence of LVI, and elevated mitotic rate. These factors were incorporated into a carcinoid of the rectum risk stratification (CaRRS) score. CaRRS predicted recurrence-free and disease-specific survival better than any single factor alone.

Conclusions

Poor prognostic features of rectal carcinoids include: large size, deep invasion, LVI, and elevated mitotic rate. The CaRRS score incorporates these features and accurately predicts outcome. Because the CaRRS score is based upon values available on pre-operative biopsy, it can identify patients with very favorable prognosis as well as those with poor prognosis that may benefit from additional staging or surveillance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rorstad O. Prognostic indicators for carcinoid neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. J Surg Oncol 2005; 89(3):151–60PubMedCrossRef Rorstad O. Prognostic indicators for carcinoid neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. J Surg Oncol 2005; 89(3):151–60PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Soga J. Carcinoids of the rectum: an evaluation of 1271 reported cases. Surg Today 1997; 27(2):112–9PubMedCrossRef Soga J. Carcinoids of the rectum: an evaluation of 1271 reported cases. Surg Today 1997; 27(2):112–9PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mani S, et al. Carcinoids of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179(2):231–48PubMed Mani S, et al. Carcinoids of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179(2):231–48PubMed
4.
go back to reference Schindl M, et al. Stage-dependent therapy of rectal carcinoid tumors. World J Surg 1998; 22(6):628–33; discussion 634PubMedCrossRef Schindl M, et al. Stage-dependent therapy of rectal carcinoid tumors. World J Surg 1998; 22(6):628–33; discussion 634PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jetmore AB, et al. Rectal carcinoids: the most frequent carcinoid tumor. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35(8):717–25PubMedCrossRef Jetmore AB, et al. Rectal carcinoids: the most frequent carcinoid tumor. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35(8):717–25PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Naunheim KS, et al. Rectal carcinoid tumors–treatment and prognosis. Surgery 1983; 94(4):670–6PubMed Naunheim KS, et al. Rectal carcinoid tumors–treatment and prognosis. Surgery 1983; 94(4):670–6PubMed
7.
go back to reference Federspiel BH, et al. Rectal and colonic carcinoids. A clinicopathologic study of 84 cases. Cancer 1990; 65(1):135–40PubMedCrossRef Federspiel BH, et al. Rectal and colonic carcinoids. A clinicopathologic study of 84 cases. Cancer 1990; 65(1):135–40PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Koura AN, et al. Carcinoid tumors of the rectum: effect of size, histopathology, and surgical treatment on metastasis free survival. Cancer 1997; 79(7):1294–8PubMedCrossRef Koura AN, et al. Carcinoid tumors of the rectum: effect of size, histopathology, and surgical treatment on metastasis free survival. Cancer 1997; 79(7):1294–8PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Soga J. Early-stage carcinoids of the gastrointestinal tract: an analysis of 1914 reported cases. Cancer 2005; 103(8):1587–95PubMedCrossRef Soga J. Early-stage carcinoids of the gastrointestinal tract: an analysis of 1914 reported cases. Cancer 2005; 103(8):1587–95PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Hochwald SN, et al. Prognostic factors in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: an analysis of 136 cases with a proposal for low-grade and intermediate-grade groups. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(11):2633–42PubMedCrossRef Hochwald SN, et al. Prognostic factors in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: an analysis of 136 cases with a proposal for low-grade and intermediate-grade groups. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(11):2633–42PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Travis WD, et al. Survival analysis of 200 pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors with clarification of criteria for atypical carcinoid and its separation from typical carcinoid. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22(8):934–44PubMedCrossRef Travis WD, et al. Survival analysis of 200 pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors with clarification of criteria for atypical carcinoid and its separation from typical carcinoid. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22(8):934–44PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Heah SM, et al. Tumor size is irrelevant in predicting malignant potential of carcinoid tumors of the rectum. Tech Coloproctol 2001; 5(2):73–7PubMedCrossRef Heah SM, et al. Tumor size is irrelevant in predicting malignant potential of carcinoid tumors of the rectum. Tech Coloproctol 2001; 5(2):73–7PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nikou GC, et al. Current diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal carcinoids in a series of 101 patients: the significance of serum chromogranin-A, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and somatostatin analogues. Hepatogastroenterology 2005; 52(63):731–41PubMed Nikou GC, et al. Current diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal carcinoids in a series of 101 patients: the significance of serum chromogranin-A, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and somatostatin analogues. Hepatogastroenterology 2005; 52(63):731–41PubMed
Metadata
Title
Carcinoid of the Rectum Risk Stratification (CaRRs): A Strategy for Preoperative Outcome Assessment
Authors
Bridget N. Fahy
Laura H. Tang
David Klimstra
W. Douglas Wong
Jose G. Guillem
Philip B. Paty
Larissa K. F. Temple
Jinru Shia
Martin R. Weiser
Publication date
01-05-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9311-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2007 Go to the issue