Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2007

01-03-2007

The Utility of Intraoperative Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer

Authors: Matthew S. Pugliese, MD, Ronald Tickman, MD, Nan Ping Wang, MD, PhD, Mary Atwood, CTR, J David Beatty, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In breast cancer treatment, intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation is used to identify patients who may potentially benefit from immediate completion of axillary lymph node dissection.

Methods

Prospectively collected breast cancer registry data identified 516 SLN biopsies between January 2003 and December 2005. Intraoperative evaluation (IE) of the SLNs was performed in 479 axillae. Final pathology by hematoxylin and eosin and, for negative nodes, by immunohistochemical stains was compared with the IE result. The effect of IE and final pathology on surgical treatment was examined.

Results

The sensitivities for IE of N0(i+) (n = 39), N1mi (n = 41), and N1a–3a (n = 89) metastases were 0%, 5%, and 63%, respectively. The specificity was 99.7%. IE identified 57 (44%) of SLN-positive (N1mi and N1a–3a) axillae, thus resulting in synchronous axillary lymph node dissection for those patients. Reoperation for false-negative IEs (N1mi or N1a–3a with negative IE) occurred in only 27 axillae (39%).

Conclusions

IE of SLNs has adequate sensitivity and excellent specificity. In addition to allowing patients to benefit from synchronous surgery, IE helped patients to receive care in concordance with recommended practice guidelines. The false-negative IE of SLNs highlights uncertainty with the clinical significance of axillary nodal staging when only small amounts of metastatic disease are identified in the axilla.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, et al. Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement, 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124:966–78PubMed Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, et al. Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement, 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124:966–78PubMed
2.
go back to reference Singletary SE, Alfred C, Ashley P, et al. Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:3628–36PubMedCrossRef Singletary SE, Alfred C, Ashley P, et al. Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:3628–36PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994; 220:391–8PubMedCrossRef Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994; 220:391–8PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. JAMA 1996; 276:1818–22PubMedCrossRef Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. JAMA 1996; 276:1818–22PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kelley MC, Hansen N, McMasters KM. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg 2004; 188:49–61PubMedCrossRef Kelley MC, Hansen N, McMasters KM. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg 2004; 188:49–61PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Morrell RM, Halyard MY, Schild SE, Muna AS, Gunderson LL, Pockaj BA. Breast cancer-related lymphedema. Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80:1480–4PubMed Morrell RM, Halyard MY, Schild SE, Muna AS, Gunderson LL, Pockaj BA. Breast cancer-related lymphedema. Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80:1480–4PubMed
7.
go back to reference Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 12:491–500CrossRef Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 12:491–500CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Motomura K, Inaji H, Komoike Y, et al. Intraoperative sentinel lymph node examination by imprint cytology and frozen sectioning during breast surgery. Br J Surg 2000; 87:597–601PubMedCrossRef Motomura K, Inaji H, Komoike Y, et al. Intraoperative sentinel lymph node examination by imprint cytology and frozen sectioning during breast surgery. Br J Surg 2000; 87:597–601PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Diest PJ, Torrenga H, Borgstein PJ, et al. Reliability of intraoperative frozen section and imprint cytological investigation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Histopathology 1999; 35:14–8PubMedCrossRef Diest PJ, Torrenga H, Borgstein PJ, et al. Reliability of intraoperative frozen section and imprint cytological investigation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Histopathology 1999; 35:14–8PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Menes TS, Tartter PI, Mizrachi H, Smith SR, Estabrook A. Touch preparation or frozen section of sentinel lymph node metastases from breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:1166–70PubMedCrossRef Menes TS, Tartter PI, Mizrachi H, Smith SR, Estabrook A. Touch preparation or frozen section of sentinel lymph node metastases from breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:1166–70PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pugliese MS, Kohr JR, Allison KH, Wang NP, Tickman RJ, Beatty JD. Accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology in sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Am J Surg 2006; 192:516–9PubMedCrossRef Pugliese MS, Kohr JR, Allison KH, Wang NP, Tickman RJ, Beatty JD. Accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology in sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Am J Surg 2006; 192:516–9PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DME, Bevilacqua JLB, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:1140–51PubMedCrossRef Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DME, Bevilacqua JLB, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:1140–51PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Houvenaeghel G, Nos C, Mignotte H, et al. Micrometastases in sentinel lymph node in a multicentric study: predictive factors of nonsentinel lymph node involvement. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:1814–21PubMedCrossRef Houvenaeghel G, Nos C, Mignotte H, et al. Micrometastases in sentinel lymph node in a multicentric study: predictive factors of nonsentinel lymph node involvement. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:1814–21PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nasser IA, Lee AK, Bosari S, Saganich R, Heatley G, Silverman ML. Occult axillary lymph node metastases in “node-negative” breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1993; 24:950–7PubMedCrossRef Nasser IA, Lee AK, Bosari S, Saganich R, Heatley G, Silverman ML. Occult axillary lymph node metastases in “node-negative” breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1993; 24:950–7PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Susnik B, Frkovic-Grazio S, Bracko M. Occult micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes predict subsequent distant metastases in stage I breast cancer: a case-control study with 15-year follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11:568–72PubMedCrossRef Susnik B, Frkovic-Grazio S, Bracko M. Occult micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes predict subsequent distant metastases in stage I breast cancer: a case-control study with 15-year follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11:568–72PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Singletary ES. Early-stage invasive breast cancer: isolated tumor cells in axillary lymph nodes, peripheral blood, and bone marrow. Gen Surg News 33:17–20 Singletary ES. Early-stage invasive breast cancer: isolated tumor cells in axillary lymph nodes, peripheral blood, and bone marrow. Gen Surg News 33:17–20
17.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:7703–20PubMedCrossRef Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:7703–20PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kane JM III, Edge SB, Winston JS, Watroba N, Hurd TC. Intraoperative pathologic evaluation of a breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy as a determinant for synchronous axillary lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:361–7PubMedCrossRef Kane JM III, Edge SB, Winston JS, Watroba N, Hurd TC. Intraoperative pathologic evaluation of a breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy as a determinant for synchronous axillary lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:361–7PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shiver SA, Creager AJ, Geisinger K, Perrier ND, Shen P, Levine EA. Intraoperative analysis of sentinel lymph nodes by imprint cytology for cancer of the breast. Am J Surg 2002; 184:424–7PubMedCrossRef Shiver SA, Creager AJ, Geisinger K, Perrier ND, Shen P, Levine EA. Intraoperative analysis of sentinel lymph nodes by imprint cytology for cancer of the breast. Am J Surg 2002; 184:424–7PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mullenix PS, Carter PL, Martin MJ, et al. Predictive value of intraoperative touch preparation analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for axillary metastasis in breast cancer. Am J Surg 2003; 185:420–4PubMedCrossRef Mullenix PS, Carter PL, Martin MJ, et al. Predictive value of intraoperative touch preparation analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for axillary metastasis in breast cancer. Am J Surg 2003; 185:420–4PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Karamlou T, Johnson NM, Chan B, Franzini D, Mahin D. Accuracy of intraoperative touch imprint cytologic analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Am J Surg 2003; 185:425–8PubMedCrossRef Karamlou T, Johnson NM, Chan B, Franzini D, Mahin D. Accuracy of intraoperative touch imprint cytologic analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Am J Surg 2003; 185:425–8PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nagashima T, Suzuki M, Yagata H, et al. Intraoperative cytologic diagnosis of sentinel node metastases in breast cancer. Acta Cytol 2003; 47:1028–32PubMed Nagashima T, Suzuki M, Yagata H, et al. Intraoperative cytologic diagnosis of sentinel node metastases in breast cancer. Acta Cytol 2003; 47:1028–32PubMed
24.
go back to reference Zgajnar J, Frkovic-Grazio S, Besic N, et al. Low sensitivity of the touch imprint cytology of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients—results of a large series. J Surg Oncol 2004; 85:82–6PubMedCrossRef Zgajnar J, Frkovic-Grazio S, Besic N, et al. Low sensitivity of the touch imprint cytology of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients—results of a large series. J Surg Oncol 2004; 85:82–6PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ravichandran D, Kocjan G, Falzon M, Ball RY, Ralphs DN. Imprint cytology of the sentinel lymph node in the assessment of axillary node status in breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30:238–42PubMedCrossRef Ravichandran D, Kocjan G, Falzon M, Ball RY, Ralphs DN. Imprint cytology of the sentinel lymph node in the assessment of axillary node status in breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30:238–42PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Forbes RC, Pitchford C, Simpson JF, Balch GC, Kelley MC. Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Am Surg 2005; 71:955–60PubMed Forbes RC, Pitchford C, Simpson JF, Balch GC, Kelley MC. Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Am Surg 2005; 71:955–60PubMed
Metadata
Title
The Utility of Intraoperative Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer
Authors
Matthew S. Pugliese, MD
Ronald Tickman, MD
Nan Ping Wang, MD, PhD
Mary Atwood, CTR
J David Beatty, MD
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9270-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2007 Go to the issue