Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2006

01-08-2006

Geographical Variation in Surveillance Strategies After Curative-Intent Surgery for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer

Authors: Frank E. Johnson, MD, Michael H. Johnson, BS, Marc F. Clemente, MD, Randal C. Paniello, MD, Katherine S. Virgo, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Analysis of geographical variation in utilization of medical resources is often used to identify regions of overutilization or underutilization.

Methods

We surveyed the membership of the American Head and Neck Society regarding their recommended frequency of office visits and 13 imaging studies and blood tests for their patients after potentially curative therapy for upper aerodigestive tract cancers.

Results

Of the 1322 members surveyed, 610 (46%) responded: 420 responses (32%) were assessable. Responses were compared by US Census Region, Metropolitan Statistical Area, and managed care organization penetration rate. Overseas members (16% of assessable responses) comprised a separate category for the regional analysis. There were statistically significant variations in practice patterns among Census Regions for office visits, complete blood count, computed tomography of the head, sonography, and esophagoscopy. Non-US members recommended significantly more blood tests, imaging studies, and endoscopy than US members for routine cancer surveillance. Only the frequency of office visits differed significantly among Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Surprisingly, the penetration rate of managed care organizations had no significant effect on posttreatment surveillance intensity.

Conclusions

This analysis indicates that only a small portion of the wide variation in observed follow-up practice patterns can be explained by geographical determinants.
Literature
1.
Johnson FE, Johnson MH, Virgo KS. Current follow-up strategies after potentially curative resection of upper aerodigestive tract epidermoid carcinoma: results of a survey of members of the Society of Head and Neck Surgeons. Int J Oncol 1997; 10:927–31
2.
de Visscher AVM, Mani JJ. Routine long-term follow-up in patients treated with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, pharynx, and oral cavity: does it make sense? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120:934–9PubMed
3.
Paniello RC, Virgo KS, Johnson MH, Clemente MF, Johnson FE. Practice patterns and clinical guidelines for posttreatment follow-up of head and neck cancers: a comparison of two professional societies. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125:309–13PubMed
4.
Virgo KS, Paniello RC, Johnson FE. Costs of posttreatment surveillance for patients with upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124:564–72PubMed
5.
Welch WP, Miller ME, Welch HG, Fisher ES, Wennberg JE. Geographic variation in expenditures for physicians’ services in the United States. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:621–7PubMedCrossRef
6.
American Society for Head and Neck Surgery, Society of Head and Neck Surgeons. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancer of the Head and Neck. Pittsburgh, PA (ASHNS), and Arlington, VA (SHNS), 1996
7.
Clark JG, Virgo KS, Clemente MF, Johnson MH, Paniello RC, Johnson FE. How surgeon age affects posttreatment surveillance strategies for upper aerodigestive tract cancer patients. Am J Otolaryngol 1999; 20:217–22PubMedCrossRef
8.
Johnson FE, Virgo KS, Clemente MF, Johnson MH, Paniello RC. How tumor stage affects surgeons’ surveillance strategies after surgery for carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract. Cancer 1998; 82:1932–7PubMedCrossRef
9.
Johnson FE, McKirgan LW, Coplin MA, et al. Geographic variation in patient surveillance after colon cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:183–7PubMed
10.
Johnson FE, Naunheim KS, Coplin MA, Virgo KS. Geographic variation in the conduct of patient surveillance after lung cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:2940–9PubMed
11.
Powell TM, Thompsen JP, Virgo KS, et al. Geographic variation in patient surveillance after radical prostatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7:339–45PubMedCrossRef
12.
U.S. Bureau of the Census, County and City Data Book. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1994
13.
Hand DJ, Taylor CC. Multivariate Analysis of Variance and Repeated Measures: A Practical Approach for Behavioral Scientists. London: Chapman and Hall, 1993
14.
Powe NR, Steiner CA, Anderson GF, Das A. Awareness of providers’ use of new medical technology among private health care plans in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1996; 12:367–76PubMedCrossRef
15.
Hermann RC. Variation in ECT use in the USA. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 52:869–75
16.
Chassin MR, Galvin RW. National Roundtable on Health Care Quality: the urgent need to improve health care quality. JAMA 1998; 280:1000–5PubMedCrossRef
17.
Kolata G. Regional incongruity found in medical costs. New York Times January 30, 1996:B9
18.
Virgo KS, Johnson FE. Costs of surveillance after potentially curative treatment for cancer. In: Johnson FE, Virgo KS, eds. Cancer Patient Follow-Up. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc, 1997:23–47
19.
20.
Rosenau PV. Managing medical technology: lessons for the United States from Quebec and France. Int J Health Serv 2000; 30:617–39PubMedCrossRef
21.
Dozet A, Fischer L. Incentives for diffusion of new health care technology. Dev Health Econ Public Policy 1998; 7:161–86PubMed
22.
Yamamoto S, Watanabe S. Geographic characteristics and mortality profiles in the JPHC study: Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study on Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases. J Epidemiol 2001; 11:S8–23PubMed
23.
24.
Birkmeyer JD, Sharp SM, Finlayson SR, Fisher ES, Wennberg JE. Variation profiles of common surgical procedures. Surgery 1998; 124:917–23PubMed
25.
Diehr P, Cain KC, Kreuter W, Rosenkranz S. Can small-area variation analysis detect variation in surgery rates? The power of small-area variation analysis. Med Care 1992; 30:484–502PubMedCrossRef
26.
Coyte PC, Croxford R, Asche CV, To T, Feldman W, Friedberg J. Physician and population determinants of rates of middle-ear surgery in Ontario. JAMA 2001; 286:2128–35PubMedCrossRef
27.
Powell TM, Thompsen JP, Virgo KS, et al. Geographic variation in patient surveillance after radical prostatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7:339–45PubMedCrossRef
28.
The GIVIO Investigators. Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1994; 271:1587–92CrossRef
29.
Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Chak A, Rimm AA. Geographic and patient variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of follow-up testing after surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1999; 85:2124–31PubMedCrossRef
30.
Goldberg KC, Hartz AJ, Jacobsen SJ, Krakauer H, Rimm AA. Racial and community factors influencing coronary artery bypass graft surgery rates for all 1986 Medicare patients. JAMA 1992; 267:1473–7PubMedCrossRef
31.
Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin JS. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1102–7PubMedCrossRef
32.
Kosecoff J, Kanouse DE, Rogers WH, McCloskey L, Winslow CM, Brook RH. Effects of National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on Physician Practice. JAMA 1987; 258:2708–13PubMedCrossRef
33.
The National Cancer Policy Board of the Institute of Medicine. Fulfilling the Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003
Metadata
Title
Geographical Variation in Surveillance Strategies After Curative-Intent Surgery for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer
Authors
Frank E. Johnson, MD
Michael H. Johnson, BS
Marc F. Clemente, MD
Randal C. Paniello, MD
Katherine S. Virgo, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2006
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.04.014

Other articles of this Issue 8/2006

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2006 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Women ≤ 40 versus 50 to 60 Years: Increasing Size and Stage Disparity Compared With Older Women Over Time

OriginalPaper

Factors Predicting the Risk of In-Transit Recurrence After Sentinel Lymphonodectomy in Patients With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma

OriginalPaper

A Pathologic Complete Response of Rectal Cancer to Preoperative Combined-Modality Therapy Results in Improved Oncological Outcome Compared With Those Who Achieve No Downstaging on the Basis of Preoperative Endorectal Ultrasonography

OriginalPaper

Prognostic Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression and Microvessel Density in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography

OriginalPaper

Surgery and Hematogenous Dissemination: Comparison Between the Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells and of Tumor DNA in Plasma Before and After Tumor Resection in Rats

Editorial

Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A New Classification for an Old Challenge