Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurological Research and Practice 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Stroke | Clinical trial protocol

Rationale and design of an interventional study of cross-sectoral, coordinated treatment of stroke patients with patient-orientated outcome measurement (StroCare)

Authors: David Leander Rimmele, Theresa Schrage, Christian Brettschneider, Alexander Engels, Christian Gerloff, Martin Härter, Michael Rosenkranz, Holger Schmidt, Levente Kriston, Götz Thomalla

Published in: Neurological Research and Practice | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Stroke has a long-term impact on functional status and quality of life in multiple health domains. A well-coordinated managed care program for stroke patients is crucial for ameliorating patients’ health and cost-efficient use of resources. The aim of this study is the implementation and evaluation of an optimised cross-sectoral, coordinated and managed care program for stroke patients bridging secondary and tertiary care.

Methods

In this multi-center mixed method sequentially controlled intervention study, stroke patients with ischemic stroke (I63), transient ischemic attack and related syndromes (G45), or intracerebral haermorrhage (I64) will be invited to participate. For a 12-months period, 235 consecutive patients are expected to be enrolled and assigned standard of care treatment as an active control group. During the following 12 months, 235 consecutive patients will be enrolled and assigned to a post stroke intervention program. The StroCare intervention consists of repeated outpatient visits with specialized stroke teams, the implementation of a case manager, the use of an electronical tool for communication between acute care, rehabilitation facilities, and out-patient care, and the definition of individualized treatment targets. Patients will be followed up for 24 months. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Short Form (PROMIS-10) at 12 months after the index event, i.e. stroke or TIA. For the qualitative survey of the implementation process, 21 patients in the intervention group will be interviewed after implementation of the interventions. In addition, 20 health care providers and staff members will be interviewed before and after implementation. Additionally, economic outcomes will be evaluated after 6 and 12 months.

Perspective

The study will not only provide information about the tested intervention but is likely to be helpful for clinicians, suppliers of reimbursement, and researchers in implementing and evaluating complex interventions in stroke care in general. With this program, the health care system will have a reference model at its disposal for transfer to other regions and settings.

Trial registration

The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04159324). Approval of the local ethics committee (Ethik-Kommission der Ärztekammer Hamburg, Niedersachsen, Schleswig-Holstein) has been obtained.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnson, C. O., et al. (2019). Global, regional, and National Burden of stroke, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. The Lancet Neurology, 18(5), 439–458.CrossRef Johnson, C. O., et al. (2019). Global, regional, and National Burden of stroke, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. The Lancet Neurology, 18(5), 439–458.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chen, Q., Cao, C., Gong, L., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Health related quality of life in stroke patients and risk factors associated with patients for return to work. Medicine, 98(16), e15130.CrossRef Chen, Q., Cao, C., Gong, L., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Health related quality of life in stroke patients and risk factors associated with patients for return to work. Medicine, 98(16), e15130.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Unrath, M., Kalic, M., & Berger, K. (2013). Who Receives Rehabilitation after Stroke?: Data from the Quality Assurance Project ‘Stroke Register Northwest Germany.’. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 110(7), 101–107.PubMedPubMedCentral Unrath, M., Kalic, M., & Berger, K. (2013). Who Receives Rehabilitation after Stroke?: Data from the Quality Assurance Project ‘Stroke Register Northwest Germany.’. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 110(7), 101–107.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Hempler, I., Woitha, K., Thielhorn, U., & Farin, E. (2018). Post-stroke care after medical rehabilitation in Germany: A systematic literature review of the current provision of stroke patients. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 1–9.CrossRef Hempler, I., Woitha, K., Thielhorn, U., & Farin, E. (2018). Post-stroke care after medical rehabilitation in Germany: A systematic literature review of the current provision of stroke patients. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 1–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Heuschmann, P. U., et al. (2015). Control of Main risk factors after Ischaemic stroke across Europe: Data from the stroke-specific module of the EUROASPIRE III survey. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 22(10), 1354–1362.CrossRef Heuschmann, P. U., et al. (2015). Control of Main risk factors after Ischaemic stroke across Europe: Data from the stroke-specific module of the EUROASPIRE III survey. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 22(10), 1354–1362.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2004). “The Global Burden of Disease 2004.” Update, World Health Organization, (pp. 43–50) of 146. World Health Organization (2004). “The Global Burden of Disease 2004.” Update, World Health Organization, (pp. 43–50) of 146.
7.
go back to reference Kolominsky-Rabas, P. L., et al. (2006). Lifetime cost of ischemic stroke in Germany: Results and National Projections from a population-based stroke registry - the Erlangen stroke project. Stroke, 37(5), 1179–1183.CrossRef Kolominsky-Rabas, P. L., et al. (2006). Lifetime cost of ischemic stroke in Germany: Results and National Projections from a population-based stroke registry - the Erlangen stroke project. Stroke, 37(5), 1179–1183.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eichner, F. A., et al. (2020). Trial design and pilot phase results of a cluster-randomised intervention trial to improve stroke care after hospital discharge – The structured ambulatory post-stroke care program (SANO). European Stroke Journal, 1–9. Eichner, F. A., et al. (2020). Trial design and pilot phase results of a cluster-randomised intervention trial to improve stroke care after hospital discharge – The structured ambulatory post-stroke care program (SANO). European Stroke Journal, 1–9.
9.
go back to reference Rimmele, D. L., et al. (2020). Health-related quality of life 90 days after stroke assessed by the international consortium for health outcome measurement standard set. European Journal of Neurology, 27(12), 2508–2516.CrossRef Rimmele, D. L., et al. (2020). Health-related quality of life 90 days after stroke assessed by the international consortium for health outcome measurement standard set. European Journal of Neurology, 27(12), 2508–2516.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rimmele, D. L., et al. (2019). Outcome evaluation by patient reported outcome measures in stroke clinical practice (EPOS) protocol for a prospective observation and implementation study. Neurological Research and Practice, 0, 1–7. Rimmele, D. L., et al. (2019). Outcome evaluation by patient reported outcome measures in stroke clinical practice (EPOS) protocol for a prospective observation and implementation study. Neurological Research and Practice, 0, 1–7.
12.
go back to reference Ahmadi, M., et al. (2020). A support Programme for secondary prevention in patients with transient Ischaemic attack and minor stroke (INSPiRE-TMS): An open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Neurology, 19(1), 49–60.CrossRef Ahmadi, M., et al. (2020). A support Programme for secondary prevention in patients with transient Ischaemic attack and minor stroke (INSPiRE-TMS): An open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Neurology, 19(1), 49–60.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.CrossRef Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cella, D., et al. (2010). Initial adult health item banks and first wave testing of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) network. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.CrossRef Cella, D., et al. (2010). Initial adult health item banks and first wave testing of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) network. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Proctor, E., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76.CrossRef Proctor, E., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Scholl, I., Zill, J. M., Härter, M., & Dirmaier, J. (2014). An integrative model of patient-centeredness-a systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS One, 9(9), e107828. Scholl, I., Zill, J. M., Härter, M., & Dirmaier, J. (2014). An integrative model of patient-centeredness-a systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS One, 9(9), e107828.
19.
go back to reference Mayring, P., & Gahleitner, S. B. (2019). “Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse.” Handbuch qualitative Methoden in der Sozialen Arbeit, (pp. 295–304). Mayring, P., & Gahleitner, S. B. (2019). “Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse.” Handbuch qualitative Methoden in der Sozialen Arbeit, (pp. 295–304).
20.
go back to reference Mihaylova, B., Briggs, A., O’Hagan, A., & Thompson, S. G. (2011). Review of statistical methods for ANALYSING healthcare resources and costs. Health Economics, 20, 897–916.CrossRef Mihaylova, B., Briggs, A., O’Hagan, A., & Thompson, S. G. (2011). Review of statistical methods for ANALYSING healthcare resources and costs. Health Economics, 20, 897–916.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rationale and design of an interventional study of cross-sectoral, coordinated treatment of stroke patients with patient-orientated outcome measurement (StroCare)
Authors
David Leander Rimmele
Theresa Schrage
Christian Brettschneider
Alexander Engels
Christian Gerloff
Martin Härter
Michael Rosenkranz
Holger Schmidt
Levente Kriston
Götz Thomalla
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Stroke
Care
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2524-3489
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-021-00107-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Neurological Research and Practice 1/2021 Go to the issue