Published in:
Open Access
01-12-2019 | Stroke | Research article
Safety and clinical impact of FEES – results of the FEES-registry
Authors:
Rainer Dziewas, Matthias auf dem Brinke, Ulrich Birkmann, Götz Bräuer, Kolja Busch, Franziska Cerra, Renate Damm-Lunau, Juliane Dunkel, Amelie Fellgiebel, Elisabeth Garms, Jörg Glahn, Sandra Hagen, Sophie Held, Christine Helfer, Mirko Hiller, Christina Horn-Schenk, Christoph Kley, Nikolaus Lange, Sriramya Lapa, Christian Ledl, Beate Lindner-Pfleghar, Marion Mertl-Rötzer, Madeleine Müller, Hermann Neugebauer, Duygu Özsucu, Michael Ohms, Markus Perniß, Waltraud Pfeilschifter, Tanja Plass, Christian Roth, Robin Roukens, Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke, Beate Schumann, Julia Schwarze, Kathi Schweikert, Holger Stege, Dirk Theuerkauf, Randall S. Thomas, Ulrich Vahle, Nancy Voigt, Hermann Weber, Cornelius J. Werner, Rainer Wirth, Ingo Wittich, Hartwig Woldag, Tobias Warnecke
Published in:
Neurological Research and Practice
|
Issue 1/2019
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
At present, the flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is one of the most commonly used methods for the objective assessment of swallowing. This multicenter trial prospectively collected data on the safety of FEES and also assessed the impact of this procedure on clinical dysphagia management.
Methods
Patients were recruited in 23 hospitals in Germany and Switzerland from September 2014 to May 2017. Patient characteristics, professional affiliation of the FEES examiners (physicians or speech and language therapists), side-effects and cardiorespiratory parameters, severity of dysphagia and clinical consequences of FEES were documented.
Results
2401 patients, mean age 69.8 (14.6) years, 42.3% women, were included in the FEES-registry. The most common main diagnosis was stroke (61%), followed by Parkinson’s disease (6.5%). FEES was well tolerated by patients. Complications were reported in 2% of examinations, were all self-limited and resolved without sequelae and showed no correlation to the endoscopist’s previous experience. In more than 50% of investigations FEES led to changes of feeding strategies, in the majority of cases an upgrade of oral diet was possible.
Discussion
This study confirmed that FEES, even when performed by less experienced clinicians is a safe and well tolerated procedure and significantly impacts on the patients’ clinical course. Implementation of a FEES-service in different clinical settings may improve dysphagia care.