Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Spontaneous bone regeneration after surgical extraction of a horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: a retrospective panoramic radiograph analysis

Authors: Eugene Kim, Mi Young Eo, Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen, Hoon Joo Yang, Hoon Myoung, Soung Min Kim

Published in: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The mandibular third molar (M3) is typically the last permanent tooth to erupt because of insufficient space and thick soft tissues covering its surface. Problems such as alveolar bone loss, development of a periodontal pocket, exposure of cementum, gingival recession, and dental caries can be found in the adjacent second molars (M2) following M3 extraction. The specific aims of the study were to assess the amount and rate of bone regeneration on the distal surface of M2 and to evaluate the aspects of bone regeneration in terms of varying degree of impaction.

Methods

Four series of panoramic radiographic images were obtained from the selected cases, including images from the first visit, immediately after extraction, 6 weeks, and 6 months after extraction. ImageJ software® (NIH, USA) was used to measure linear distance from the region of interest to the distal root of the adjacent M2. Radiographic infrabony defect (RID) values were calculated from the measured radiographic bone height and cementoenamel junction with distortion compensation. Repeated measures of analysis of variance and one-way analysis of variance were conducted to analyze the statistical significant difference between RID and time, and a Spearman correlation test was conducted to assess the relationship between Pederson’s difficulty index (DI) and RID.

Results

A large RID (> 6 mm) can be reduced gradually and consistently over time. More than half of the samples recovered nearly to their normal healthy condition (RID ≤ 3 mm) by the 6-month follow-up. DI affected the first 6 weeks of post-extraction period and only showed a significant positive correlation with respect to the difference between baseline and final RID.

Conclusions

Additional treatments on M2 for a minimum of 6 months after an M3 extraction could be recommended. Although DI may affect bone regeneration during the early healing period, further study is required to elucidate any possible factors associated with the healing process. The DI does not cause any long-term adverse effects on bone regeneration after surgical extraction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kruger GO (1984) Textbook of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 6th edition, Mosby, pp 174–175. Kruger GO (1984) Textbook of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 6th edition, Mosby, pp 174–175.
2.
go back to reference Pell GJ, Gregory GT (1942) Report on a ten-year study of a tooth division technique for the removal of impacted teeth. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 28:B660–B666.CrossRef Pell GJ, Gregory GT (1942) Report on a ten-year study of a tooth division technique for the removal of impacted teeth. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 28:B660–B666.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jung YH, Cho BH (2013) Prevalence of missing and impacted third molars in adults aged 25 years and above. Imaging Sci Dent 43:219–225.CrossRef Jung YH, Cho BH (2013) Prevalence of missing and impacted third molars in adults aged 25 years and above. Imaging Sci Dent 43:219–225.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pederson GW (1988) Surgical removal of tooth. In: Pederson GW (ed) Oral surgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia. Pederson GW (1988) Surgical removal of tooth. In: Pederson GW (ed) Oral surgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia.
5.
go back to reference Morris CR, Jerman AC (1971) Panoramic radiographic survey: a study of embedded third molars. J Oral Surg 29:122–125.PubMed Morris CR, Jerman AC (1971) Panoramic radiographic survey: a study of embedded third molars. J Oral Surg 29:122–125.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Srivastava N, Shetty A, Goswami RD, Apparaju V, Bagga V, Kale S (2017) Incidence of distal caries in mandibular second molars due to impacted third molars: nonintervention strategy of asymptomatic third molars causes harm? A retrospective study. Int J Appl Bas Med Res 7:15–19. Srivastava N, Shetty A, Goswami RD, Apparaju V, Bagga V, Kale S (2017) Incidence of distal caries in mandibular second molars due to impacted third molars: nonintervention strategy of asymptomatic third molars causes harm? A retrospective study. Int J Appl Bas Med Res 7:15–19.
7.
go back to reference Claudia A, Barbu HM, Adi L, Gultekin A, Reiser V, Gultekin P, Mijiritsky E (2018) Relationship between third mandibular molar angulation and distal cervical caries in the second molar. J Craniofac Surg 29:2267–2271.PubMed Claudia A, Barbu HM, Adi L, Gultekin A, Reiser V, Gultekin P, Mijiritsky E (2018) Relationship between third mandibular molar angulation and distal cervical caries in the second molar. J Craniofac Surg 29:2267–2271.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee HD, Hong KS, Chung CH, Lim SB (2006) A study on the periodontal status of second molar adjacent third molar. Kor J Periodontol 36:489–502.CrossRef Lee HD, Hong KS, Chung CH, Lim SB (2006) A study on the periodontal status of second molar adjacent third molar. Kor J Periodontol 36:489–502.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Peng K, Tseng Y, Shen E, Chiu SFE, Huang Y (2001) Mandibular second molar periodontal status after third molar extraction. J Periodontol 72:1647–1651.CrossRef Peng K, Tseng Y, Shen E, Chiu SFE, Huang Y (2001) Mandibular second molar periodontal status after third molar extraction. J Periodontol 72:1647–1651.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A (1985) Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A retrospective study. Int J Oral Surg 14:29–40.CrossRef Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A (1985) Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A retrospective study. Int J Oral Surg 14:29–40.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A (1986) Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. Precision and accuracy of radiographic assessment of intrabony defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 15:675–686.CrossRef Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A (1986) Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. Precision and accuracy of radiographic assessment of intrabony defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 15:675–686.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kugelberg CF (1990) Periodontal healing two and four years after impacted lower third molar surgery. A comparative retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 19:341–345.CrossRef Kugelberg CF (1990) Periodontal healing two and four years after impacted lower third molar surgery. A comparative retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 19:341–345.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Faria AI, Gallas-Torreira M, López-Ratón M (2012) Mandibular second molar periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction in young adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2732–2741.CrossRef Faria AI, Gallas-Torreira M, López-Ratón M (2012) Mandibular second molar periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction in young adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2732–2741.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shin HS, Kim HD (2015) Association between the number of existing permanent teeth and health-related quality of life (EuroQol-5 dimension) among adults: findings from the fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2012. J Korean Acad Oral Health 39:303–310.CrossRef Shin HS, Kim HD (2015) Association between the number of existing permanent teeth and health-related quality of life (EuroQol-5 dimension) among adults: findings from the fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2012. J Korean Acad Oral Health 39:303–310.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference No HJ, Cho SS (2016) Survey and statistical analysis using spss. Hak-hyun-sa, Seoul, pp 165–245. No HJ, Cho SS (2016) Survey and statistical analysis using spss. Hak-hyun-sa, Seoul, pp 165–245.
16.
go back to reference Park YK (2010) SPSS data analysis for social welfare. Shinjeong, Seoul, pp 234–254. Park YK (2010) SPSS data analysis for social welfare. Shinjeong, Seoul, pp 234–254.
17.
go back to reference Marmary Y, Brayer L, Tzukert A, Feller L (1986) Alveolar bone repair following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 61:324–326.CrossRef Marmary Y, Brayer L, Tzukert A, Feller L (1986) Alveolar bone repair following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 61:324–326.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Krausz AA, Machtei EE, Peled M (2005) Effects of lower third molar extraction on attachment position and alveolar bone height of the adjacent second molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:756–760.CrossRef Krausz AA, Machtei EE, Peled M (2005) Effects of lower third molar extraction on attachment position and alveolar bone height of the adjacent second molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:756–760.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A, Kvint S (1991) Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery in adolescents and adults. A prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 20:18–24.CrossRef Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A, Kvint S (1991) Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery in adolescents and adults. A prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 20:18–24.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kan KW, Liu JK, Lo EC (2002) Residual periodontal defects distal to the mandibular second molar 6-36 months after impacted third molar extraction. J Clin Periodontol 29:1004.CrossRef Kan KW, Liu JK, Lo EC (2002) Residual periodontal defects distal to the mandibular second molar 6-36 months after impacted third molar extraction. J Clin Periodontol 29:1004.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sanderink GC, Visser WN, Kramers EW (1991) The origin of a case of severe image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 20:169–171.CrossRef Sanderink GC, Visser WN, Kramers EW (1991) The origin of a case of severe image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 20:169–171.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Choi YG, Kim YK, Eckert SE, Shim CH (2004) Cross-sectional study of the factors that influence radiographic magnification of implant diameter and length. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:594–596.PubMed Choi YG, Kim YK, Eckert SE, Shim CH (2004) Cross-sectional study of the factors that influence radiographic magnification of implant diameter and length. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:594–596.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Samawi SS, Burke PH (1984) Angular distortion in the orthopantomogram. Br J Orthod 11:100–107.CrossRef Samawi SS, Burke PH (1984) Angular distortion in the orthopantomogram. Br J Orthod 11:100–107.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Devlin H, Yuan J (2013) Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42:29951683.CrossRef Devlin H, Yuan J (2013) Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42:29951683.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shahidi S, Zamiri B, Abolvardi M, Akhlaghian M, Paknahad M (2018) Comparison of dental panoramic radiography and CBCT for measuring vertical bone height in different horizontal locations of posterior mandibular alveolar process. J Dent 19:83–91. Shahidi S, Zamiri B, Abolvardi M, Akhlaghian M, Paknahad M (2018) Comparison of dental panoramic radiography and CBCT for measuring vertical bone height in different horizontal locations of posterior mandibular alveolar process. J Dent 19:83–91.
26.
go back to reference Inocêncio Faria A, Gallas-Torreira M, López-Ratón M, Crespo-Vázquez E, Rodríguez-Núñez I, López-Castro G (2013) Radiological infrabony defects after impacted mandibular third molar extractions in young adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:2020–2028.CrossRef Inocêncio Faria A, Gallas-Torreira M, López-Ratón M, Crespo-Vázquez E, Rodríguez-Núñez I, López-Castro G (2013) Radiological infrabony defects after impacted mandibular third molar extractions in young adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:2020–2028.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Araújo M, Lindhe J (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:212–218.CrossRef Araújo M, Lindhe J (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:212–218.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J (2003) Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 30:809–818.CrossRef Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J (2003) Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 30:809–818.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Montero J, Mazzaglia G (2011) Effect of removing an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the mandibular second molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:2691–2697.CrossRef Montero J, Mazzaglia G (2011) Effect of removing an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the mandibular second molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:2691–2697.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Susarla SM, Dodson TB (2004) Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:1363–1371.CrossRef Susarla SM, Dodson TB (2004) Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:1363–1371.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Spontaneous bone regeneration after surgical extraction of a horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: a retrospective panoramic radiograph analysis
Authors
Eugene Kim
Mi Young Eo
Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen
Hoon Joo Yang
Hoon Myoung
Soung Min Kim
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2288-8586
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-018-0187-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1/2019 Go to the issue