Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Medical Research 1/2020

01-12-2020 | SARS-CoV-2 | Review

Face masks: benefits and risks during the COVID-19 crisis

Authors: Christiane Matuschek, Friedrich Moll, Heiner Fangerau, Johannes C. Fischer, Kurt Zänker, Martijn van Griensven, Marion Schneider, Detlef Kindgen-Milles, Wolfram Trudo Knoefel, Artur Lichtenberg, Balint Tamaskovics, Freddy Joel Djiepmo-Njanang, Wilfried Budach, Stefanie Corradini, Dieter Häussinger, Torsten Feldt, Björn Jensen, Rainer Pelka, Klaus Orth, Matthias Peiper, Olaf Grebe, Kitti Maas, Peter Arne Gerber, Alessia Pedoto, Edwin Bölke, Jan Haussmann

Published in: European Journal of Medical Research | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The German government has made it mandatory to wear respiratory masks covering mouth and nose (MNC) as an effective strategy to fight SARS-CoV-2 infections. In many countries, this directive has been extended on shopping malls or public transportation. The aim of this paper is to critically analyze the statutory regulation to wear protective masks during the COVID-19 crisis from a medical standpoint.

Methods

We performed an extensive query of the most recent publications addressing the prevention of viral infections including the use of face masks in the community as a method to prevent the spread of the infection. We addressed the issues of practicability, professional use, and acceptability based on the community and the environment where the user resided.

Results

Upon our critical review of the available literature, we found only weak evidence for wearing a face mask as an efficient hygienic tool to prevent the spread of a viral infection. However, the use of MNC seems to be linked to relevant protection during close contact scenarios by limiting pathogen-containing aerosol and liquid droplet dissemination. Importantly, we found evidence for significant respiratory compromise in patients with severe obstructive pulmonary disease, secondary to the development of hypercapnia. This could also happen in patients with lung infections, with or without SARS-CoV-2.

Conclusion

Epidemiologists currently emphasize that wearing MNC will effectively interrupt airborne infections in the community. The government and the politicians have followed these recommendations and used them to both advise and, in some cases, mandate the general population to wear MNC in public locations. Overall, the results seem to suggest that there are some clinically relevant scenarios where the use of MNC necessitates more defined recommendations. Our critical evaluation of the literature both highlights the protective effects of certain types of face masks in defined risk groups, and emphasizes their potential risks.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sonntag Grundriß. der gesamten Chirurgie Allgemeine Chirurgie 1. Abschnitt Aseptik Springer: Berlin Heidelberg; 1937. Sonntag Grundriß. der gesamten Chirurgie Allgemeine Chirurgie 1. Abschnitt Aseptik Springer: Berlin Heidelberg; 1937.
3.
go back to reference Wells WF, Wells MW. Air-Borne Iinfection. J Am Med Assoc. 1936;107(21):1698–703.CrossRef Wells WF, Wells MW. Air-Borne Iinfection. J Am Med Assoc. 1936;107(21):1698–703.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bourouiba, L., Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions: Potential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19. Jama, 2020. Bourouiba, L., Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions: Potential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19. Jama, 2020.
5.
go back to reference Leung NHL, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat Med. 2020;26(5):676–80.CrossRef Leung NHL, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat Med. 2020;26(5):676–80.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chia SE, et al. Appropriate use of personal protective equipment among healthcare workers in public sector hospitals and primary healthcare polyclinics during the SARS outbreak in Singapore. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(7):473–7.CrossRef Chia SE, et al. Appropriate use of personal protective equipment among healthcare workers in public sector hospitals and primary healthcare polyclinics during the SARS outbreak in Singapore. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(7):473–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lipp, A. and P. Edwards, Disposable surgical face masks: a systematic review. Can Oper Room Nurs J, 2005. 23(3): p. 20-21, 24-25, 33-38. Lipp, A. and P. Edwards, Disposable surgical face masks: a systematic review. Can Oper Room Nurs J, 2005. 23(3): p. 20-21, 24-25, 33-38.
8.
9.
go back to reference Rengasamy S, Eimer B, Shaffer RE. Simple respiratory protection–evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20–1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010;54(7):789–98.PubMedPubMedCentral Rengasamy S, Eimer B, Shaffer RE. Simple respiratory protection–evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20–1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010;54(7):789–98.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Smith JD, et al. Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2016;188(8):567–74.CrossRef Smith JD, et al. Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2016;188(8):567–74.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zhou SS, et al. Assessment of a respiratory face mask for capturing air pollutants and pathogens including human influenza and rhinoviruses. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(3):2059–69.CrossRef Zhou SS, et al. Assessment of a respiratory face mask for capturing air pollutants and pathogens including human influenza and rhinoviruses. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(3):2059–69.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Konda, A., et al., Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks. ACS Nano, 2020. Konda, A., et al., Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks. ACS Nano, 2020.
13.
go back to reference Verbeek, J.H., et al., Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020. 4: p. CD011621. Verbeek, J.H., et al., Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020. 4: p. CD011621.
14.
go back to reference Sinkule EJ, Powell JB, Goss FL. Evaluation of N95 respirator use with a surgical mask cover: effects on breathing resistance and inhaled carbon dioxide. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57(3):384–98.PubMed Sinkule EJ, Powell JB, Goss FL. Evaluation of N95 respirator use with a surgical mask cover: effects on breathing resistance and inhaled carbon dioxide. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57(3):384–98.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Roberge RJ. Are exhalation valves on N95 filtering facepiece respirators beneficial at low-moderate work rates: an overview. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(11):617–23.CrossRef Roberge RJ. Are exhalation valves on N95 filtering facepiece respirators beneficial at low-moderate work rates: an overview. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(11):617–23.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Roberge RJ, et al. Surgical mask placement over N95 filtering facepiece respirators: physiological effects on healthcare workers. Respirology. 2010;15(3):516–21.CrossRef Roberge RJ, et al. Surgical mask placement over N95 filtering facepiece respirators: physiological effects on healthcare workers. Respirology. 2010;15(3):516–21.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kim JH, Benson SM, Roberge RJ. Pulmonary and heart rate responses to wearing N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(1):24–7.CrossRef Kim JH, Benson SM, Roberge RJ. Pulmonary and heart rate responses to wearing N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(1):24–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Roberge RJ, Kim JH, Powell JB. N95 respirator use during advanced pregnancy. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(10):1097–100.CrossRef Roberge RJ, Kim JH, Powell JB. N95 respirator use during advanced pregnancy. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(10):1097–100.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kyung SY, et al. Risks of N95 Face Mask Use in Subjects With COPD. Respir Care. 2020;65(5):658–64.CrossRef Kyung SY, et al. Risks of N95 Face Mask Use in Subjects With COPD. Respir Care. 2020;65(5):658–64.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Face masks: benefits and risks during the COVID-19 crisis
Authors
Christiane Matuschek
Friedrich Moll
Heiner Fangerau
Johannes C. Fischer
Kurt Zänker
Martijn van Griensven
Marion Schneider
Detlef Kindgen-Milles
Wolfram Trudo Knoefel
Artur Lichtenberg
Balint Tamaskovics
Freddy Joel Djiepmo-Njanang
Wilfried Budach
Stefanie Corradini
Dieter Häussinger
Torsten Feldt
Björn Jensen
Rainer Pelka
Klaus Orth
Matthias Peiper
Olaf Grebe
Kitti Maas
Peter Arne Gerber
Alessia Pedoto
Edwin Bölke
Jan Haussmann
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
European Journal of Medical Research / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 2047-783X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00430-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

European Journal of Medical Research 1/2020 Go to the issue