Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Opioid-Related Disorders | Research

Assessing the readiness of digital data infrastructure for opioid use disorder research

Authors: Arjun Venkatesh, Caitlin Malicki, Kathryn Hawk, Gail D’Onofrio, Jeremiah Kinsman, Andrew Taylor

Published in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Gaps in electronic health record (EHR) data collection and the paucity of standardized clinical data elements (CDEs) captured from electronic and digital data sources have impeded research efforts aimed at understanding the epidemiology and quality of care for opioid use disorder (OUD). We identified existing CDEs and evaluated their validity and usability, which is required prior to infrastructure implementation within EHRs.

Methods

We conducted (a) a systematic literature review of publications in Medline, Embase and the Web of Science using a combination of at least one term related to OUD and EHR and (b) an environmental scan of publicly available data systems and dictionaries used in national informatics and quality measurement of policy initiatives. Opioid-related data elements identified within the environmental scan were compared with related data elements contained within nine common health data code systems and each element was graded for alignment with match results categorized as “exact”, “partial”, or “none.”

Results

The literature review identified 5186 articles for title search, of which 75 abstracts were included for review and 38 articles were selected for full-text review. Full-text articles yielded 237 CDEs, only 12 (5.06%) of which were opioid-specific. The environmental scan identified 379 potential data elements and value sets across 9 data systems and libraries, among which only 84 (22%) were opioid-specific. We found substantial variability in the types of clinical data elements with limited overlap and no single data system included CDEs across all major data element types such as substance use disorder, OUD, medication and mental health. Relative to common health data code systems, few data elements had an exact match (< 1%), while 61% had a partial match and 38% had no matches.

Conclusions

Despite the increasing ubiquity of EHR data standards and national attention placed on the opioid epidemic, we found substantial fragmentation in the design and construction of OUD related CDEs and little OUD specific CDEs in existing data dictionaries, systems and literature. Given the significant gaps in data collection and reporting, future work should leverage existing structured data elements to create standard workflow processes to improve OUD data capture in EHR systems.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NCfHSMCoD-oCWOD, released December 2018. Accessed 11 Nov 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NCfHSMCoD-oCWOD, released December 2018. Accessed 11 Nov 2019.
2.
go back to reference Miclette MA, Leff JA, Cuan I, Samet JH, Saloner B, Mendell G, et al. Closing the gaps in opioid use disorder research, policy and practice: conference proceedings. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018;13(1):22.CrossRef Miclette MA, Leff JA, Cuan I, Samet JH, Saloner B, Mendell G, et al. Closing the gaps in opioid use disorder research, policy and practice: conference proceedings. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018;13(1):22.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Opmeer BC. Electronic health records as sources of research data. JAMA. 2016;315(2):201–2.CrossRef Opmeer BC. Electronic health records as sources of research data. JAMA. 2016;315(2):201–2.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tai B, Wu LT, Clark HW. Electronic health records: essential tools in integrating substance abuse treatment with primary care. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2012;3:1–8.CrossRef Tai B, Wu LT, Clark HW. Electronic health records: essential tools in integrating substance abuse treatment with primary care. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2012;3:1–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lingren T, Sadhasivam S, Zhang X, Marsolo K. Electronic medical records as a replacement for prospective research data collection in postoperative pain and opioid response studies. Int J Med Inform. 2018;111:45–50.CrossRef Lingren T, Sadhasivam S, Zhang X, Marsolo K. Electronic medical records as a replacement for prospective research data collection in postoperative pain and opioid response studies. Int J Med Inform. 2018;111:45–50.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Carrell D, Mardekian J, Cronkite D, Ramaprasan A, Hansen K, Gross DE, et al. A fully automated algorithm for identifying patients with problem prescription opioid use using electronic health record data. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;171:e36.CrossRef Carrell D, Mardekian J, Cronkite D, Ramaprasan A, Hansen K, Gross DE, et al. A fully automated algorithm for identifying patients with problem prescription opioid use using electronic health record data. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;171:e36.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ghitza UE, Sparenborg S, Tai B. Improving drug abuse treatment delivery through adoption of harmonized electronic health record systems. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2011;2011(2):125–31.CrossRef Ghitza UE, Sparenborg S, Tai B. Improving drug abuse treatment delivery through adoption of harmonized electronic health record systems. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2011;2011(2):125–31.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tai B, McLellan AT. Integrating information on substance use disorders into electronic health record systems. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;43(1):12–9.CrossRef Tai B, McLellan AT. Integrating information on substance use disorders into electronic health record systems. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;43(1):12–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Samuels EA, D’Onofrio G, Huntley K, Levin S, Schuur JD, Bart G, et al. A quality framework for emergency department treatment of opioid use disorder. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;73(3):237–47.CrossRef Samuels EA, D’Onofrio G, Huntley K, Levin S, Schuur JD, Bart G, et al. A quality framework for emergency department treatment of opioid use disorder. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;73(3):237–47.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bodenreider O, Nguyen D, Chiang P, Chuang P, Madden M, Winnenburg R, et al. The NLM value set authority center. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1224.PubMedPubMedCentral Bodenreider O, Nguyen D, Chiang P, Chuang P, Madden M, Winnenburg R, et al. The NLM value set authority center. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1224.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Kirby JC, Speltz P, Rasmussen LV, Basford M, Gottesman O, Peissig PL, et al. PheKB: a catalog and workflow for creating electronic phenotype algorithms for transportability. J Am Med Inf Assoc JAMIA. 2016;23(6):1046–52.CrossRef Kirby JC, Speltz P, Rasmussen LV, Basford M, Gottesman O, Peissig PL, et al. PheKB: a catalog and workflow for creating electronic phenotype algorithms for transportability. J Am Med Inf Assoc JAMIA. 2016;23(6):1046–52.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Connor JP, Gullo MJ, White A, Kelly AB. Polysubstance use: diagnostic challenges, patterns of use and health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(4):269–75.CrossRef Connor JP, Gullo MJ, White A, Kelly AB. Polysubstance use: diagnostic challenges, patterns of use and health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(4):269–75.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessing the readiness of digital data infrastructure for opioid use disorder research
Authors
Arjun Venkatesh
Caitlin Malicki
Kathryn Hawk
Gail D’Onofrio
Jeremiah Kinsman
Andrew Taylor
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1940-0640
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-020-00198-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2020 Go to the issue