Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Public sector low threshold office-based buprenorphine treatment: outcomes at year 7

Authors: Elenore Patterson Bhatraju, Ellie Grossman, Babak Tofighi, Jennifer McNeely, Danae DiRocco, Mara Flannery, Ann Garment, Keith Goldfeld, Marc N. Gourevitch, Joshua D. Lee

Published in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Buprenorphine maintenance for opioid dependence remains of limited availability among underserved populations, despite increases in US opioid misuse and overdose deaths. Low threshold primary care treatment models including the use of unobserved, “home,” buprenorphine induction may simplify initiation of care and improve access. Unobserved induction and long-term treatment outcomes have not been reported recently among large, naturalistic cohorts treated in low threshold safety net primary care settings.

Methods

This prospective clinical registry cohort design estimated rates of induction-related adverse events, treatment retention, and urine opioid results for opioid dependent adults offered buprenorphine maintenance in a New York City public hospital primary care office-based practice from 2006 to 2013. This clinic relied on typical ambulatory care individual provider-patient visits, prescribed unobserved induction exclusively, saw patients no more than weekly, and did not require additional psychosocial treatment. Unobserved induction consisted of an in-person screening and diagnostic visit followed by a 1-week buprenorphine written prescription, with pamphlet, and telephone support. Primary outcomes analyzed were rates of induction-related adverse events (AE), week 1 drop-out, and long-term treatment retention. Factors associated with treatment retention were examined using a Cox proportional hazard model among inductions and all patients. Secondary outcomes included overall clinic retention, buprenorphine dosages, and urine sample results.

Results

Of the 485 total patients in our registry, 306 were inducted, and 179 were transfers already on buprenorphine. Post-induction (n = 306), week 1 drop-out was 17%. Rates of any induction-related AE were 12%; serious adverse events, 0%; precipitated withdrawal, 3%; prolonged withdrawal, 4%. Treatment retention was a median 38 weeks (range 0–320) for inductions, compared to 110 (0–354) weeks for transfers and 57 for the entire clinic population. Older age, later years of first clinic visit (vs. 2006–2007), and baseline heroin abstinence were associated with increased treatment retention overall.

Conclusions

Unobserved “home” buprenorphine induction in a public sector primary care setting appeared a feasible and safe clinical practice. Post-induction treatment retention of a median 38 weeks was in line with previous naturalistic studies of real-world office-based opioid treatment. Low threshold treatment protocols, as compared to national guidelines, may compliment recently increased prescriber patient limits and expand access to buprenorphine among public sector opioid use disorder patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration. Clinical guidelines for the use of buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid addiction. Rockville: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; 2004. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration. Clinical guidelines for the use of buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid addiction. Rockville: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; 2004.
2.
go back to reference Fiellin DA, et al. Consensus statement on office-based treatment of opioid dependence using buprenorphine. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;27(2):153–9.CrossRefPubMed Fiellin DA, et al. Consensus statement on office-based treatment of opioid dependence using buprenorphine. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;27(2):153–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kampman K, Jarvis M. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) national practice guideline for the use of medications in the treatment of addiction involving opioid use. J Addict Med. 2015;9(5):358–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kampman K, Jarvis M. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) national practice guideline for the use of medications in the treatment of addiction involving opioid use. J Addict Med. 2015;9(5):358–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Schackman BR, et al. Cost-effectiveness of long-term outpatient buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for opioid dependence in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(6):669–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schackman BR, et al. Cost-effectiveness of long-term outpatient buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for opioid dependence in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(6):669–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Fiellin DA, et al. Primary care-based buprenorphine taper vs maintenance therapy for prescription opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1947–54.CrossRefPubMed Fiellin DA, et al. Primary care-based buprenorphine taper vs maintenance therapy for prescription opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1947–54.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Sigmon SC. Access to treatment for opioid dependence in rural America: challenges and future directions. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(4):359–60.CrossRefPubMed Sigmon SC. Access to treatment for opioid dependence in rural America: challenges and future directions. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(4):359–60.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Williams AR, Bisaga A. From AIDS to opioids—How to combat an epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(9):813–5.CrossRefPubMed Williams AR, Bisaga A. From AIDS to opioids—How to combat an epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(9):813–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hansen HB, et al. Variation in use of buprenorphine and methadone treatment by racial, ethnic, and income characteristics of residential social areas in New York City. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2013;40(3):367–77.CrossRefPubMed Hansen HB, et al. Variation in use of buprenorphine and methadone treatment by racial, ethnic, and income characteristics of residential social areas in New York City. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2013;40(3):367–77.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kermack A, Flannery M, Tofighi B, McNeely J, Lee JD. Buprenorphine prescribing practice trends and attitudes among New York providers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;74:1–6.CrossRefPubMed Kermack A, Flannery M, Tofighi B, McNeely J, Lee JD. Buprenorphine prescribing practice trends and attitudes among New York providers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;74:1–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Barry DT, et al. Integrating buprenorphine treatment into office-based practice: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(2):218–25.CrossRefPubMed Barry DT, et al. Integrating buprenorphine treatment into office-based practice: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(2):218–25.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kissin W, et al. Experiences of a national sample of qualified addiction specialists who have and have not prescribed buprenorphine for opioid dependence. J Addict Dis. 2006;25(4):91–103.CrossRefPubMed Kissin W, et al. Experiences of a national sample of qualified addiction specialists who have and have not prescribed buprenorphine for opioid dependence. J Addict Dis. 2006;25(4):91–103.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Netherland J, et al. Factors affecting willingness to provide buprenorphine treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;36(3):244–51.CrossRefPubMed Netherland J, et al. Factors affecting willingness to provide buprenorphine treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;36(3):244–51.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Walley AY, et al. Office-based management of opioid dependence with buprenorphine: clinical practices and barriers. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(9):1393–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walley AY, et al. Office-based management of opioid dependence with buprenorphine: clinical practices and barriers. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(9):1393–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Alford DP, et al. Collaborative care of opioid-addicted patients in primary care using buprenorphine: five-year experience. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(5):425–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alford DP, et al. Collaborative care of opioid-addicted patients in primary care using buprenorphine: five-year experience. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(5):425–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Altice FL, et al. HIV treatment outcomes among HIV-infected, opioid-dependent patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone treatment within HIV clinical care settings: results from a multisite study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;56(Suppl 1):S22–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Altice FL, et al. HIV treatment outcomes among HIV-infected, opioid-dependent patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone treatment within HIV clinical care settings: results from a multisite study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;56(Suppl 1):S22–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Cunningham C, et al. Buprenorphine treatment in an urban community health center: what to expect. Fam Med. 2008;40(7):500–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Cunningham C, et al. Buprenorphine treatment in an urban community health center: what to expect. Fam Med. 2008;40(7):500–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
22.
go back to reference Soeffing JM, et al. Buprenorphine maintenance treatment in a primary care setting: outcomes at 1 year. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;37(4):426–30.CrossRefPubMed Soeffing JM, et al. Buprenorphine maintenance treatment in a primary care setting: outcomes at 1 year. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;37(4):426–30.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Stancliff S, et al. Opioid maintenance treatment as a harm reduction tool for opioid-dependent individuals in New York City: the need to expand access to buprenorphine/naloxone in marginalized populations. J Addict Dis. 2012;31(3):278–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stancliff S, et al. Opioid maintenance treatment as a harm reduction tool for opioid-dependent individuals in New York City: the need to expand access to buprenorphine/naloxone in marginalized populations. J Addict Dis. 2012;31(3):278–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Haddad MS, Zelenev A, Altice FL. Integrating buprenorphine maintenance therapy into federally qualified health centers: real-world substance abuse treatment outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;131(1–2):127–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haddad MS, Zelenev A, Altice FL. Integrating buprenorphine maintenance therapy into federally qualified health centers: real-world substance abuse treatment outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;131(1–2):127–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Lee JD, et al. Home buprenorphine/naloxone induction in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(2):226–32.CrossRefPubMed Lee JD, et al. Home buprenorphine/naloxone induction in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(2):226–32.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lee JD, Vocci F, Fiellin DA. Unobserved “home” induction onto buprenorphine. J Addict Med. 2014;8(5):299–308.CrossRefPubMed Lee JD, Vocci F, Fiellin DA. Unobserved “home” induction onto buprenorphine. J Addict Med. 2014;8(5):299–308.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Fiellin DA, et al. Long-term treatment with buprenorphine/naloxone in primary care: results at 2–5 years. Am J Addict. 2008;17(2):116–20.CrossRefPubMed Fiellin DA, et al. Long-term treatment with buprenorphine/naloxone in primary care: results at 2–5 years. Am J Addict. 2008;17(2):116–20.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Horstmann E, et al. Retaining HIV-infected patients in care: Where are we? Where do we go from here? Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):752–61.PubMed Horstmann E, et al. Retaining HIV-infected patients in care: Where are we? Where do we go from here? Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):752–61.PubMed
30.
go back to reference McLellan AT, Starrels JL, Tai B, Gordon AJ, Brown R, Ghitza U, Gourevitch M, Stein J, Oros M, Horton T, Lindblad R, McNeely J. Can Substance Use Disorders be Managed Using the Chronic Care Model? Review and Recommendations from a NIDA Consensus Group. Public Health Rev. 2014;35(2). PMID: 26568649. http://www.journalindex.net/visit.php?j=6676. McLellan AT, Starrels JL, Tai B, Gordon AJ, Brown R, Ghitza U, Gourevitch M, Stein J, Oros M, Horton T, Lindblad R, McNeely J. Can Substance Use Disorders be Managed Using the Chronic Care Model? Review and Recommendations from a NIDA Consensus Group. Public Health Rev. 2014;35(2). PMID: 26568649. http://​www.​journalindex.​net/​visit.​php?​j=​6676.
31.
go back to reference Weiss RD, et al. Long-term outcomes from the national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network prescription opioid addiction treatment study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;150:112–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weiss RD, et al. Long-term outcomes from the national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network prescription opioid addiction treatment study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;150:112–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Cunningham CO, et al. A comparison of buprenorphine induction strategies: patient-centered home-based inductions versus standard-of-care office-based inductions. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011;40(4):349–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cunningham CO, et al. A comparison of buprenorphine induction strategies: patient-centered home-based inductions versus standard-of-care office-based inductions. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011;40(4):349–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Gunderson EW, et al. Unobserved versus observed office buprenorphine/naloxone induction: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Addict Behav. 2010;35(5):537–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gunderson EW, et al. Unobserved versus observed office buprenorphine/naloxone induction: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Addict Behav. 2010;35(5):537–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Gibson AE, et al. A comparison of buprenorphine treatment in clinic and primary care settings: a randomised trial. Med J Aust. 2003;179(1):38–42.PubMed Gibson AE, et al. A comparison of buprenorphine treatment in clinic and primary care settings: a randomised trial. Med J Aust. 2003;179(1):38–42.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Sohler NL, et al. Home- versus office-based buprenorphine inductions for opioid-dependent patients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010;38(2):153–9.CrossRefPubMed Sohler NL, et al. Home- versus office-based buprenorphine inductions for opioid-dependent patients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010;38(2):153–9.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Fiellin DA, et al. Counseling plus buprenorphine-naloxone maintenance therapy for opioid dependence. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):365–74.CrossRefPubMed Fiellin DA, et al. Counseling plus buprenorphine-naloxone maintenance therapy for opioid dependence. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):365–74.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference O’Connor PG, et al. A randomized trial of buprenorphine maintenance for heroin dependence in a primary care clinic for substance users versus a methadone clinic. Am J Med. 1998;105(2):100–5.CrossRefPubMed O’Connor PG, et al. A randomized trial of buprenorphine maintenance for heroin dependence in a primary care clinic for substance users versus a methadone clinic. Am J Med. 1998;105(2):100–5.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Cunningham CO, et al. Prior buprenorphine experience is associated with office-based buprenorphine treatment outcomes. J Addict Med. 2013;7(4):287–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cunningham CO, et al. Prior buprenorphine experience is associated with office-based buprenorphine treatment outcomes. J Addict Med. 2013;7(4):287–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Bukten A, et al. Factors associated with dropout among patients in opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) and predictors of re-entry. A national registry-based study. Addict Behav. 2014;39(10):1504–9.CrossRefPubMed Bukten A, et al. Factors associated with dropout among patients in opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) and predictors of re-entry. A national registry-based study. Addict Behav. 2014;39(10):1504–9.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Potter JS, et al. Buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone maintenance treatment outcomes for opioid analgesic, heroin, and combined users: findings from starting treatment with agonist replacement therapies (START). J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013;74(4):605–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Potter JS, et al. Buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone maintenance treatment outcomes for opioid analgesic, heroin, and combined users: findings from starting treatment with agonist replacement therapies (START). J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013;74(4):605–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
44.
go back to reference D’Onofrio G, et al. Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(16):1636–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral D’Onofrio G, et al. Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(16):1636–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Fiellin DA, et al. A randomized trial of cognitive behavioral therapy in primary care-based buprenorphine. Am J Med. 2013;126(1):74 e11–7.CrossRef Fiellin DA, et al. A randomized trial of cognitive behavioral therapy in primary care-based buprenorphine. Am J Med. 2013;126(1):74 e11–7.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Moore BA, et al. Counseling and directly observed medication for primary care buprenorphine maintenance: a pilot study. J Addict Med. 2012;6(3):205–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore BA, et al. Counseling and directly observed medication for primary care buprenorphine maintenance: a pilot study. J Addict Med. 2012;6(3):205–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Tetrault JM, et al. Brief versus extended counseling along with buprenorphine/naloxone for HIV-infected opioid dependent patients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;43(4):433–9.CrossRefPubMed Tetrault JM, et al. Brief versus extended counseling along with buprenorphine/naloxone for HIV-infected opioid dependent patients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;43(4):433–9.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Weiss RD, et al. Adjunctive counseling during brief and extended buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for prescription opioid dependence: a 2-phase randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(12):1238–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weiss RD, et al. Adjunctive counseling during brief and extended buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for prescription opioid dependence: a 2-phase randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(12):1238–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Monico LB, et al. Buprenorphine treatment and 12-step meeting attendance: conflicts, compatibilities, and patient outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015;57:89–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Monico LB, et al. Buprenorphine treatment and 12-step meeting attendance: conflicts, compatibilities, and patient outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015;57:89–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Polomeni P, Schwan R. Management of opioid addiction with buprenorphine: French history and current management. Int J Gen Med. 2014;7:143–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Polomeni P, Schwan R. Management of opioid addiction with buprenorphine: French history and current management. Int J Gen Med. 2014;7:143–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Public sector low threshold office-based buprenorphine treatment: outcomes at year 7
Authors
Elenore Patterson Bhatraju
Ellie Grossman
Babak Tofighi
Jennifer McNeely
Danae DiRocco
Mara Flannery
Ann Garment
Keith Goldfeld
Marc N. Gourevitch
Joshua D. Lee
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1940-0640
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-017-0072-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2017 Go to the issue