Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Protocol

Incorporating and evaluating citizen engagement in health research: a scoping review protocol

Authors: Anmol Shahid, Brianna K. Rosgen, Karla D. Krewulak, Diane L. Lorenzetti, Nadine Foster, Bonnie G. Sept, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Henry T. Stelfox, Kirsten M. Fiest

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Citizen engagement in research is an emerging practice that involves members of the general public in research processes such as priority setting, planning, decision-making, research conduct, implementation, evaluation, and dissemination. Engaging citizens in research, particularly health research, increases the relevance of study findings, minimizes waste by facilitating stewardship over resources, and builds public trust in the research. While several existing frameworks guide the application of citizen engagement principles to health research, it is unclear how citizen engagement can be utilized to maximize benefits and minimize risks and challenges in health research. To address the gaps in knowledge around citizen engagement in health research, we propose a scoping review to synthesize the state of knowledge on methods to incorporate and evaluate citizen engagement in research. A protocol is presented in this manuscript.

Methods

The methodology for our scoping review is guided by Arksey and O’ Malley’s framework for scoping reviews, and additional recommendations by Levac and colleagues. We will include peer-reviewed and gray literature that report on citizen engagement in health research (including biomedical, clinical, health systems and services, and social, cultural, environmental and population health) and report method(s) to conduct, measure, or evaluate citizen engagement. We will systematically search electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, JSTOR, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Science Direct) from inception onwards and search relevant organizations’ websites for additional studies, frameworks, and reports on citizen engagement. Title and abstract and full-text citations will be screened independently and in duplicate. Data will be extracted independently and in duplicate, including document characteristics, citizen engagement definitions and goals, and outcomes of citizen engagement (e.g., barriers, facilitators).

Discussion

This review will synthesize the definitions, goals, methods, outcomes, and significance of citizen engagement in health research, as well as any potential barriers, facilitators, and challenges outlined in existing literature. The findings will provide an evidence-based foundation for developing new or improved guidance for citizen engagement in health research. Overall, we anticipate that our scoping review will be a preliminary step to meaningful engagement of citizens in research and strengthen the relationship between the scientific community and the public through transparency and collaboration.

Systematic review registration

Open Science Framework https://​osf.​io/​hzcbr.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CIHR’s framework for citizen engagement. Ottawa, ON; 2012. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CIHR’s framework for citizen engagement. Ottawa, ON; 2012.
2.
go back to reference INVOLVE. Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. 2009. INVOLVE. Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. 2009.
9.
go back to reference Horobin A. Going the extra mile - creating a co-operative model for supporting patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2:9.CrossRef Horobin A. Going the extra mile - creating a co-operative model for supporting patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2:9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Incorporating and evaluating citizen engagement in health research: a scoping review protocol
Authors
Anmol Shahid
Brianna K. Rosgen
Karla D. Krewulak
Diane L. Lorenzetti
Nadine Foster
Bonnie G. Sept
Jeanna Parsons Leigh
Henry T. Stelfox
Kirsten M. Fiest
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01812-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Systematic Reviews 1/2021 Go to the issue