Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Gestational Diabetes | Protocol

Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: protocol for a scoping review

Authors: Jessica Breuing, Christine Graf, Annika Lena Neuhaus, Simone Heß, Lena Lütkemeier, Fabiola Haas, Mark Spiller, Dawid Pieper

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2019

Abstract

Background

The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus is nearly 9%, with an upward trend in type 2 and gestational diabetes mellitus (T2DM/GDM). Evidence shows that vulnerable groups are affected disproportionally. Therefore, there is an increasing need to implement policies to prevent risk factors for T2DM/GDM and to promote a healthy lifestyle. However, up to now, no gold standard in terms of communication strategies and/or public awareness campaigns is known.

Methods/design

We will conduct a systematic scoping review to evaluate communication strategies in the prevention of T2DM/GDM in vulnerable groups. Two reviewers will independently screen the results of the electronic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, Social Science Citation Index, and CINAHL. Extracted data will be charted, categorized, and summarized.

Discussion

The results will be used to inform the National education and communication strategy on diabetes mellitus in Germany. In particular, the results will be discussed in focus groups of experts to develop recommendations for communication strategies.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO does not register scoping reviews.

Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, Cavan D, Shaw JE, Makaroff LE. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:40–50.CrossRef

International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel MB, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, Dyer AR, Ad L, Hod M, Kitzmiler JL, Lowe LP, HD MI, Oats JJ, Omori Y, Schmidt MI. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):676–82.CrossRef

Bommer CSV, Heesemann E, Manne-Goehler J, Atun R, Bärnighausen T, Davies J, Vollmer S. Global economic burden of diabetes in adults: projections from 2015 to 2030. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):963–70.CrossRef

Association AD. 5. Prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:51–4.CrossRef

All Parliamentary Group for Diabetes and Diabetes UK. Diabetes and the disadvantaged: reducing health inequalities in the UK 2006.

Meeks KAF-D-SD, Adeyemo A, Beune EJ, Modesti PA, Stronks K, Zafarmand MH, Agyemang C. Disparities in type 2 diabetes prevalence among ethnic minority groups resident in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intern Emerg Med. 2016;11(3).

Cefalu WT, Buse JB, Tuomilehto J, Fleming GA, Ferrannini E, Gerstein HC, Bennett PH, Ramachandran A, Raz I, Rosenstock J, Kahn SE. Update and next steps for real-world translation of interventions for type 2 diabetes prevention: reflections from a Diabetes Care Editors’ Expert Forum. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(7):1186–201.CrossRef

Shamseer LMD, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart L, PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:1–25.

Arksey HaOM L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef

10.

Institute TJB. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. 2015.

11.

Organization WH. List of member states by WHO region and mortality stratum. 1999; Available from: http://www.who.int/whr/2003/en/member_states_182-184_en.pdf.

12.

Lewis VKLB, McClurg A, Goldman Boswell R, Fisher ES. The promise and peril of accountable care for vulnerable populations: a framework for overcoming obstacles. Health Aff. 2012;31(8):1777–85.CrossRef

13.

McGowan JSM, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 Guideline Explanation and Elaboration (PRESS E&E). J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–6.CrossRef

Title: Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: protocol for a scoping review
Authors: Jessica Breuing
Christine Graf
Annika Lena Neuhaus
Simone Heß
Lena Lütkemeier
Fabiola Haas
Mark Spiller
Dawid Pieper
Publication date: 01-12-2019
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Gestational Diabetes
Gestational Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes
Published in: Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1021-9

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: protocol for a scoping review

Abstract

Background

Methods/design

Discussion

Systematic review registration

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods/design

Discussion

Systematic review registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Psychological interventions for alcohol use disorders in people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review

The epidemiology of intransient TB-induced hyperglycaemia in previously undiagnosed diabetes mellitus 2 individuals: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Understanding how and why de-implementation works in health and care: research protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence

Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines

Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error

Lifestyle interventions to maternal weight loss after birth: a systematic review