Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Systematic Reviews
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Protocol

Implementation of self-management support in cancer care and normalization into routine practice: a systematic scoping literature review protocol

Authors: Doris Howell, Alison Richardson, Carl May, Lynn Calman, Rouhi Fazelzad, Saeed Moradian, Claire Foster

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cancer survivors face a myriad of biopsychosocial consequences due to cancer and treatment that may be potentially mitigated through enabling their self-management skills and behaviors for managing illness. Unfortunately, the cancer system lags in its systematic provision of self-management support (SMS) in routine care, and it is unclear what implementation approaches or strategies work to embed SMS in the cancer context to inform health policy and administrator decision-making.

Methods/design

A comprehensive scoping review study of the literature will be conducted based on methods and steps identified by Arksey and O’Malley and experts in the field. Electronic searches will be conducted in multiple databases including CINAHL, CENTRAL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, AMED, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (up to Issue 2, 2015), ISI Proceedings (Web of Science), PsychAbstracts, and Sociological Abstracts from January 1997 to November 5, 2018. Following the PRISMA-Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), two authors will independently screen all titles/abstracts to determine eligibility, data will be abstracted by one author and checked by a second author, and findings will be narratively summarized based on constructs of implementation in the Normalization Process Theory.

Discussion

This will be the first scoping review study to synthesize knowledge of implementation of SMS in the cancer care context and the implementation approaches and strategies on embedding in care. This information will be critical to inform health policy and knowledge end users about the necessary changes in care to embed SMS in practices and to stimulate future research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Miller CA, Kimberly D, Miller MPH, Siegel RL, Rebecca L, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics. CA J Clin. 2016;66:271–89.CrossRef
2.
Weaver KE, Forsythe LP, Reeve BB, et al. Mental and physical health-related quality of life among US cancer survivors: population estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2012;21:2108–17.CrossRef
3.
Brown ML. Burden of illness in cancer survivors: findings from a population-based national sample. JNCI. 2004;96:1322–30.CrossRef
4.
Arndt V, Koch-Gallenkamp L, Jansen L, et al. Quality of life in long-term and very long-term cancer survivors versus population controls in Germany. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:190–7.CrossRef
5.
Jones JM, Olson K, Catton P, Catton CN, Fleshner NE, Krzyzanowska MK, McCready DR, Wong RK, Jiang H, Howell D. Cancer-related fatigue and associated disability in post-treatment cancer survivors. J Cancer Survivorship. 2016;10(1):51–61.CrossRef
6.
Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, editors. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
7.
Elliott J, Fallows A, Staetsky L, Smith PWF, Foster CL, Maher EJ, et al. The health and well-being of cancer survivors in the UK: findings from a population-based survey. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:S11–20.CrossRef
8.
Drury A, Payne S, Brady A-M. The cost of survival: an exploration of colorectal cancer survivors' experiences of pain. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:205–11.CrossRef
9.
Lu D, Anderson TM, Fall K, Hultman CM, Czene K, Valdimarsdottir U, Fang F. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders immediately before and after cancer diagnosis: a nationwide matched cohort study in Sweden. JAMA Oncology. 2016;2(9):1188.CrossRef
10.
Dunn J, Ng S, Holland J, Aitken J, Youl P, Baade PD, Chambers SK. Trajectories of psychological distress after colorectal cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(8):1759–65.CrossRef
11.
Mitchell AJ, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P. Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:721–32.CrossRef
12.
Foster C, Fenlon D. Recovery and self-management support following primary cancer treatment. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(Suppl.1):S21–8.CrossRef
13.
Schmid D, Leitzmann MF. Association between physical activity and mortality among breast cancer and colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(7):1293–311.CrossRef
14.
Franek J. Self-management support interventions for persons with chronic disease: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013;13(9):1–60.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Brady TJ, Murphy L, O'Colmain BJ, Beauchesne D, Daniels B, Greenberg M, House M, Chervin D. A meta-analysis of health status, health behaviors, and healthcare utilization outcomes of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:120112.CrossRef
16.
Taylor SJC, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, et al. A rapid synthesis of the evidence on interventions supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions: PRISMS Practical Systematic Review of Self-Management Support for long-term conditions. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014;2:54.CrossRef
17.
Hammer MJ, Ercolano EA, Wright F, Dickson VV, et al. Self-management for adult patients with cancer: an integrative review. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38(2):E10–26.CrossRef
18.
Smith-Turchyn J, Morgan A, Richardson J. The effectiveness of group-based self-management programs to improve physical and psychological outcomes in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Oncol. 2016;28(5):292–305.CrossRef
19.
McCorkle R, Ercolano E, Lazenby M, Schulman-Green D, Schilling LS, et al. Self-management: enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(1):50–62.CrossRef
20.
Howell D, Harth T, Brown JA, Bennet C, Boyco S. Self-management education interventions for patients with cancer: a systematic review. Supp Care Canc. 2017;25(4):1323–55.CrossRef
21.
IOM quality cancer care IOM (Institute of Medicine). Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.
22.
Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469–75.CrossRef
23.
Nasmith L, Ballem P, Baxter R, Bergman H, Colin-Thome D, et al. Transforming care for Canadians with chronic health conditions. Put people first, expect the best, manage for results. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Academy of Health Sciences, 2010.
24.
Richards T, Snow R, Schroter S. Co-creating health: more than a dream. BMJ. 2016;354:i4550.CrossRef
25.
Panagioti M, Richardson G, Murray E, Rogers A, Kennedy A, Newman S, et al. Reducing Care Utilisation through self-management Interventions (RECURSIVE): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014:2(54).
26.
27.
Tritter JQ, Calnan M. Cancer as a chronic illness? Reconsidering categorization and exploring experience. Euro Journal of Cancer Care. 2002;11(3):161–5.CrossRef
28.
Curry SJ, Corrigan J, Institute of Medicine. Priority areas for national action: transforming health care quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
29.
Black N, Mays N. Synthesizing evidence for management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(Supplement 1):S1:1–S1:56.
30.
Tricca AC, Lillie A, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.CrossRef
31.
Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, Kastner M, Moher D. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–4.CrossRef
32.
Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell; 2005.
33.
Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef
34.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):55–69.CrossRef
35.
Pham MT, Rajic A, Grieg JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of the scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5:371–85.CrossRef
36.
Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29–45.CrossRef
37.
Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2007;7:16.CrossRef
38.
Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Taylor SJC. Phase IV implementation studies: the forgotten finale to the complex intervention methodology framework. Annals Am Thoracic Soc. 2014;11:S118–22.CrossRef
39.
Fixsen D, Naoom S, Blase K, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication #231) Tampa. FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; 2005. [2016-08-26]
40.
Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139.CrossRef
41.
42.
Squires JE, Sullivan K, Eccles MP, Worswick J, Grimshaw JM. Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals’ behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):152.CrossRef
43.
44.
Priority areas for national action: transforming health care quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
45.
Foster C, Brown J, Killen M, et al. The NCRI cancer experiences collaborative: defining self-management. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11:295–7.CrossRef
46.
Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–87.CrossRef
47.
Adams K, Greiner AC, Corrigan JM. The 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit—a focus on communities, vol. 57. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press; 2004.
48.
Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.CrossRef
49.
Von Korff M, Gruman J, Schaefer J, Curry SJ, Wagner EH. Collaborative management of chronic illness. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(12):1097–102.CrossRef
50.
Newman S, Steed L, Mulligan K. Self-management interventions for chronic illness. Lancet. 2004;364(9444):1523–37.CrossRef
51.
Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff. 2003;32:207–14.CrossRef
52.
Schofield P, Chambers S. Effective, clinically feasible and sustainable: key design features of psycho-educational and supportive care interventions to promote individualized self-management in cancer care. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:805–12.CrossRef
53.
Pearce G, Parke HL, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Bourne CLA, Sheikh A, Taylor SJC. The PRISMS taxonomy of self-management support: derivation of a novel taxonomy and initial testing of its utility. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016;21(2):73–82.
54.
Fenlon D, Foster C. Self-management support: a review of the evidence. Macmillan Research Unit: University of Southampton; 2009.
55.
Davies NJ, Batehup L. Self-management support for cancer survivors: guidance for developing interventions. An update of the evidence: Macmillan Research Unit, University of Southampton; 2009.
56.
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40.CrossRef
57.
McGowan J, Sampson M, Lefebvre C. An evidence based checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC). Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2010;5(1):149–54.CrossRef
58.
59.
Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract. 1998;1:2–4.PubMed
60.
Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14.CrossRef
61.
Higgins J, Deeks JJ. Selecting studies and collecting data in J. P. Higgins, Deeks, JJ (Ed.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (pp. 151–186). Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester; 2008.
62.
NVivo qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 10, 2012.
63.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(4):264–269.
64.
Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(4):365–71.CrossRef
65.
Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):45–53.CrossRef
66.
Popay J, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a product from the ESRC Methods Programme.
67.
Krippendorff K. (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand oaks, CA: sage; 2005. p. 413.
68.
Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRef
69.
May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–54.CrossRef
70.
May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci. 2016;1(141):1–12.
71.
Kennedy A. Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients. Implement Sci. 2014;9:129.CrossRef
72.
Lund S, Richardson A, May C. Barriers to advanced care planning at the end-of-life: an explanatory systematic review of implementation studies. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0116629.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Implementation of self-management support in cancer care and normalization into routine practice: a systematic scoping literature review protocol
Authors
Doris Howell
Alison Richardson
Carl May
Lynn Calman
Rouhi Fazelzad
Saeed Moradian
Claire Foster
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0952-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Systematic Reviews 1/2019 Go to the issue

Protocol

Effects of aerobic exercise in the treatment of older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a protocol of a systematic review

Protocol

Network meta-analysis of randomised trials of pharmacological, psychotherapeutic, exercise and collaborative care interventions for depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease: hybrid systematic review of systematic reviews protocol

Protocol

Association between harm reduction strategies and healthcare utilization in patients on long-term prescribed opioid therapy presenting to acute healthcare settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Systematic review update

A systematic review of natural killer cells profile and cytotoxic function in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Protocol

Gender differences in the provision of key post-arrest interventions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients—protocol for a systematic review

Research

Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review