Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Protocol

Strategies for incorporating patient-reported outcomes in the care of people with chronic kidney disease (PRO kidney): a protocol for a realist synthesis

Authors: Kara Schick-Makaroff, Onouma Thummapol, Stephanie Thompson, Rachel Flynn, Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi, Scott Klarenbach, Richard Sawatzky, Joanne Greenhalgh

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient-reported outcomes and experience measures (jointly referred to here as PROs) are internationally recognized as a means for patients to provide information about their quality of life, symptoms, and experiences with care. Although increasingly recognized as key to improving the quality of healthcare at individual (e.g., patients, caregivers, and providers) and aggregate (e.g., government, policy/system-wide decision-making) levels, there are important knowledge gaps in our understanding of how PROs are, and can be, used across different settings, particularly in nephrology to enhance person-centered care. This knowledge is needed for developing strategies to guide optimal use of PROs in nephrology care. Currently, no strategies exist. The purpose of this review is to address this knowledge gap by answering the following realist question: How can PROs be used to enhance person-centered nephrology care, both at individual and aggregate levels?

Methodology

Realist synthesis is an explanatory approach to data synthesis that aims to explain how context and mechanisms influence the outcome of an intervention. An initial program theory will be developed through the systematic search of the published literature in bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, EBSCOhost CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus) on existing theories explaining how PROs are used in healthcare settings. This initial program theory will then be tested and refined through the process of realist synthesis, using context-mechanism-outcome configurations. A kidney-specific program theory will then be created to address the utilization of PROs in nephrology across individual and aggregate levels to augment person-centered care. Searching will be iterative and refined as data is extracted and analyzed using a pilot-tested context + mechanism = outcome heuristic. Throughout, we will consult methodological experts, research team practitioners, and the Patient Advisory Committee to help refine the theories. Last, we will develop and disseminate knowledge translation products widely to knowledge user groups.

Discussion

The utilization of PROs remains a challenge in nephrology. The findings from this synthesis will provide a framework to guide both policy makers and practitioners on how to enhance person-centered care through successful utilization of PROs across individual and aggregate levels in nephrology.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42017056063
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Manns B, Hemmelgarn B, Lillie E, Crowe S, Cyr A, Gladish M, et al. Setting research priorities for patients on or nearing dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:1813–21.CrossRef Manns B, Hemmelgarn B, Lillie E, Crowe S, Cyr A, Gladish M, et al. Setting research priorities for patients on or nearing dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:1813–21.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mapes DL, Lopes AA, Satayathum S, McCullough KP, Goodkin DA, Locatelli F, et al. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Kidney Int. 2003;64:339–49.CrossRef Mapes DL, Lopes AA, Satayathum S, McCullough KP, Goodkin DA, Locatelli F, et al. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Kidney Int. 2003;64:339–49.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mapes DL, Lopes AA, Satayathum S, McCullough KP, Goodkin DA, Locatelli F, et al. Health-related quality of life in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44(Suppl 2):S54–60.CrossRef Mapes DL, Lopes AA, Satayathum S, McCullough KP, Goodkin DA, Locatelli F, et al. Health-related quality of life in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44(Suppl 2):S54–60.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2016. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2016.
6.
go back to reference Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;14:137–44.CrossRef Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;14:137–44.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hewitt-Taylor J. Developing person-centred practice: a practical approach to quality healthcare. London: Palgrave, U: Macmillan; 2015.CrossRef Hewitt-Taylor J. Developing person-centred practice: a practical approach to quality healthcare. London: Palgrave, U: Macmillan; 2015.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ashby ME, Dowding C. Hospice care and patients’ pain: communication between patients, relatives, nurses and doctors. Int J Pall Care Nurs. 2001;7(2):58–67.CrossRef Ashby ME, Dowding C. Hospice care and patients’ pain: communication between patients, relatives, nurses and doctors. Int J Pall Care Nurs. 2001;7(2):58–67.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dowsett SM, Saul JL, Butow PN, Dunn SM, Boyer MJ, Findlow R, Dunsmore J. Communication styles in the cancer consultation: preferences for a patient-centred approach. Psycho-Oncology. 2000;9(2):147–56.CrossRef Dowsett SM, Saul JL, Butow PN, Dunn SM, Boyer MJ, Findlow R, Dunsmore J. Communication styles in the cancer consultation: preferences for a patient-centred approach. Psycho-Oncology. 2000;9(2):147–56.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Krishnan M, Brunelli SM, Maddux FW, Parker TF, Johnson D, Nissenson AR, et al. Guiding principles and checklist for population-based quality metrics. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;96:1124–31.CrossRef Krishnan M, Brunelli SM, Maddux FW, Parker TF, Johnson D, Nissenson AR, et al. Guiding principles and checklist for population-based quality metrics. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;96:1124–31.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hilarius DL, Kloeg PH, Gundy CM, Aaronson NK. Use of health related quality-of-life assessments in daily clinical oncology nursing practice: a community hospital-based intervention study. Cancer. 2008;113:628–37.CrossRef Hilarius DL, Kloeg PH, Gundy CM, Aaronson NK. Use of health related quality-of-life assessments in daily clinical oncology nursing practice: a community hospital-based intervention study. Cancer. 2008;113:628–37.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Santana M-J, Feeny D, Johnson JA, McAlister FA, Kim D, Weinkauf J, et al. Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:371–9.CrossRef Santana M-J, Feeny D, Johnson JA, McAlister FA, Kim D, Weinkauf J, et al. Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:371–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, Selby PJ. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized control trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:714–24.CrossRef Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, Selby PJ. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized control trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:714–24.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Detmar S, Muller M, Schornagel J, Wever L, Aaronson N, Aaronson N, et al. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(23):3027–34 [cited 18 Jan 2018].CrossRef Detmar S, Muller M, Schornagel J, Wever L, Aaronson N, Aaronson N, et al. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(23):3027–34 [cited 18 Jan 2018].CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon TA. Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review. Br Med J. 2001;322:406–9.CrossRef Gilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon TA. Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review. Br Med J. 2001;322:406–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Finkelstein FO, Wuerth D, Finkelstein SH. Health related quality of life and the CKD patient: challenges for the nephrology community. Kidney Int. 2009;76:946–52.CrossRef Finkelstein FO, Wuerth D, Finkelstein SH. Health related quality of life and the CKD patient: challenges for the nephrology community. Kidney Int. 2009;76:946–52.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Perrone RD, Coons SJ, Cavanaugh K, Finkelstein F, Meyer KB. Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of CKD-related therapies: report of a symposium sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2013;62:1046–57.CrossRef Perrone RD, Coons SJ, Cavanaugh K, Finkelstein F, Meyer KB. Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of CKD-related therapies: report of a symposium sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2013;62:1046–57.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist view – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 2005;10:21–34.CrossRef Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist view – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 2005;10:21–34.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buchingham J, Pawson R. RAMESES publication standards: realist synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69:1005–22. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buchingham J, Pawson R. RAMESES publication standards: realist synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69:1005–22.
26.
go back to reference Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: SAGE publications; 2006. Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: SAGE publications; 2006.
29.
go back to reference Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res. 2009;18:115–23. Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res. 2009;18:115–23.
30.
go back to reference Valderas JM, Alonso J. Patient reported outcome measures: a model based classification system for research and clinical practice. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:1125–35. Valderas JM, Alonso J. Patient reported outcome measures: a model based classification system for research and clinical practice. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:1125–35.
31.
go back to reference Santana M-J, Feeny D. Framework to assess the effects of using patient reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:1505–13. Santana M-J, Feeny D. Framework to assess the effects of using patient reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:1505–13.
35.
go back to reference Pawson R. Digging for nuggets: how bad research can yield good evidence. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2006;9:127–42. Pawson R. Digging for nuggets: how bad research can yield good evidence. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2006;9:127–42.
36.
go back to reference Boyce MB, Browne JP. Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:2265–78. Boyce MB, Browne JP. Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:2265–78.
37.
go back to reference Marshall S, Haywood KL, Fitzpatrick R. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12:559–68. Marshall S, Haywood KL, Fitzpatrick R. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12:559–68.
38.
go back to reference Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, Guyatt G, Ferrans CE, Alonso J, et al. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:179–93. Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, Guyatt G, Ferrans CE, Alonso J, et al. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:179–93.
39.
go back to reference Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc Sci Med. 2005;4:833. Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc Sci Med. 2005;4:833.
40.
go back to reference LaRocca R, Yost J, Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Butt M. The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:751. LaRocca R, Yost J, Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Butt M. The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:751.
41.
go back to reference Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg J, Bush PL, Henderson J, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q. 2012;90:311–46. Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg J, Bush PL, Henderson J, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q. 2012;90:311–46.
42.
go back to reference Jagosh J, Bush PL, Salsberg J, Macaulay AC, Greenhalgh T, Wong G, et al. A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1–11. Jagosh J, Bush PL, Salsberg J, Macaulay AC, Greenhalgh T, Wong G, et al. A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1–11.
Metadata
Title
Strategies for incorporating patient-reported outcomes in the care of people with chronic kidney disease (PRO kidney): a protocol for a realist synthesis
Authors
Kara Schick-Makaroff
Onouma Thummapol
Stephanie Thompson
Rachel Flynn
Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi
Scott Klarenbach
Richard Sawatzky
Joanne Greenhalgh
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0911-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Systematic Reviews 1/2019 Go to the issue