Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

ACC 2024 Congress

Catch up on all the top stories and latest evidence in cardiology research with our ACC 2024 Congress hub page.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Systematic Reviews
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Protocol

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of research on the associations between workplace bullying and sleep

Authors: Morten Birkeland Nielsen, Ståle Pallesen, Anette Harris, Ståle Valvatne Einarsen

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Existing evidence on the association between exposure to bullying and sleep is limited and inconclusive. The aims of this planned systematic review and meta-analysis are therefore (1) to determine whether exposure to workplace bullying is related to changes in sleep function and (2) to establish mediating and moderating factors that govern the relationship between bullying and sleep.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted. Electronic databases will be searched using predefined search terms to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies should report empirical findings on the association between exposure to workplace bullying and at least one indicator of sleep. Primary observational studies with cross-sectional or prospective research design, case-control studies, and studies with experimental designs will be included. Qualitative interviews and case studies will be excluded. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed with a previously established checklist for studies on workplace bullying. The quality of evidence for an association between bullying and sleep problems will evaluated in accordance with the GRADE system. A random effects meta-analysis will be conducted with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3.

Discussion

This review and meta-analysis will be among the first to systematically explore and integrate the evidence available on the association between exposure to bullying and sleep, as well as on the mediating and moderating factors that can govern this associations. By gathering and summarizing information about potential factors that can explain when and how bullying is related to sleep, the findings from this study will provide directions for future research and provide practitioners and clinicians with an understanding about the nature and consequences of workplace bullying and point to directions for relevant interventions.

Systematic review registration

The protocol has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42018082192).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Krueger, G.P., Sustained work, fatigue, sleep loss and performance: a review of the issues. Apr-Jun 1989. Work Stress, 1989. 3(2): p. 129-141.
2.
Kessler RC, et al. Insomnia and the performance of US workers: results from the America insomnia survey. Sleep. 2011;34(9):1161–71.CrossRef
3.
Vleeshouwers J, Knardahl S, Christensen JO. Effects of psychological and social work factors on self-reported sleep disturbance and difficulties initiating sleep. Sleep. 2015;39(4):833–46.
4.
Rodriguez-Munoz A, Notelaers G, Moreno-Jimenez B. Workplace bullying and sleep quality: the mediating role of worry and need for recovery. Behav Psychol Psicologia Conductual. 2011;19(2):453–68.
5.
Hansen ÅM, et al. Workplace bullying and sleep difficulties: a 2-year follow-up study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87(3):285–94.CrossRef
6.
de Lange AH, et al. A hard day’s night: a longitudinal study on the relationships among job demands and job control, sleep quality and fatigue. J Sleep Res. 2009;18(3):374–83.CrossRef
7.
Kalimo R, et al. Job stress and sleep disorders: findings from the Helsinki Heart Study. Stress Medicine. 2000;16(2):65–75.CrossRef
8.
Litwiller B, et al. The relationship between sleep and work: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2017;102(4):682–99.CrossRef
9.
Einarsen S, et al. In: Einarsen S, et al., editors. The concept of bullying and harassment at work: the European tradition, in bullying and harassment in the workplace. Developments in theory, research, and practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011. p. 3–40.
10.
Nielsen MB, Einarsen S. Outcomes of workplace bullying: a meta-analytic review. Work Stress. 2012;26(4):309–32.CrossRef
11.
Nielsen MB, et al. Workplace bullying and subsequent health problems. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen. 2014;134(12/13):1233–8.CrossRef
12.
13.
Nielsen MB, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder as a consequence of bullying at work and at school. A literature review and meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Behav. 2015;21(1):17–24.CrossRef
14.
Hansen ÅM, et al. Workplace bullying, sleep problems and leisure-time physical activity: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016;42(1):26–33.CrossRef
15.
Lallukka T, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E. Workplace bullying and subsequent sleep problems--the Helsinki Health Study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(3):204–12.CrossRef
16.
Björkqvist K, Österman K, Hjeltbäck M. Aggression among university employees. Aggress Behav. 1994;20:173–84.CrossRef
17.
Leymann H, Gustafsson A. Mobbing at work and the development of post-traumatic stress disorders. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1996;5:251–75.CrossRef
18.
Ursin H, Eriksen HR. The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004;29(5):567–92.CrossRef
19.
Meurs JA, Perrewe PL. Cognitive activation theory of stress: an integrative theoretical approach to work stress. J Manag. 2011;37(4):1043–68.
20.
Nielsen MB, et al. Exposure to aggression in the workplace. In: The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Occupational Safety and Workplace Health. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2016. p. 205–27.
21.
Rudolph KD, Troop-Gordon W, Granger DA. Individual differences in biological stress responses moderate the contribution of early peer victimization to subsequent depressive symptoms. Psychopharmacology. 2011;214(1):209–19.CrossRef
22.
Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12.CrossRef
23.
Stroup DF, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.CrossRef
24.
Ford MT, et al. How do occupational stressor-strain effects vary with time? A review and meta-analysis of the relevance of time lags in longitudinal studies. Work Stress. 2014;28(1):9–30.CrossRef
25.
Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis. In: Applied Social Research Methods Series. Vol. 49. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001.
26.
Valentine JC, Pigott TD, Rothstein HR. How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. J Educ Behav Stat. 2010;35(2):215–47.CrossRef
27.
Nielsen MB, Indregard AM, Øverland S. Workplace bullying and sickness absence – a systematic review and meta-analysis of the research literature. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016;42(5):359–70.CrossRef
28.
Kim SY, et al. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(4):408–14.CrossRef
29.
National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Hamilton: McMaster University; 2008.
30.
Guyatt G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–94.CrossRef
31.
Borenstein M, et al. Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Englewood: Biostat; 2005.
32.
Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Methods of meta-analysis. Correcting error and bias in research findings. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2004.
33.
Borenstein M, Hedges L, Rothstein H. Meta-analysis. Fixed effects vs. random effects. Englewood: Biostat; 2007.
34.
Berkeljon A, Baldwin SA. An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research. Psychother Res. 2009;19(4–5):511–8.CrossRef
35.
Higgins JPT, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.CrossRef
36.
Borenstein M, et al. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.CrossRef
37.
38.
Egger M, et al. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(1):1–76.PubMed
39.
Rugulies R. Studying the effect of the psychosocial work environment on risk of ill-health: towards a more comprehensive assessment of working conditions. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(3):187–91.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of research on the associations between workplace bullying and sleep
Authors
Morten Birkeland Nielsen
Ståle Pallesen
Anette Harris
Ståle Valvatne Einarsen
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0898-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Systematic Reviews 1/2018 Go to the issue

Correction

Correction to: Integrating multiple data sources (MUDS) for meta-analysis to improve patient-centered outcomes research: a protocol

Protocol

Evaluating optimal utilisation of technology in type 1 diabetes mellitus from a clinical and health economic perspective: protocol for a systematic review

Protocol

Bioactive scaffolds in stem-cell-based therapies for cardiac repair: protocol for a meta-analysis of randomized controlled preclinical trials in animal myocardial infarction models

Research

The effect of carbetocin compared to misoprostol in management of the third stage of labor and prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review

Methodology

Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study

Protocol

Facilitators and barriers to the delivery of school-based smoking prevention interventions for children and young people: a protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies