Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Protocol

Systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol

Authors: Gemma Greenall, Andrew Carr, David Beard, Jonathan Rees, Amar Rangan, Naomi Merritt, Melina Dritsaki, Navraj S. Nagra, Mathew Baldwin, Sally Hopewell, Jonathan A. Cook

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shoulder pain is a common problem in the general population and is responsible for prolonged periods of disability, loss of productivity, absence from work and inability to carry out household activities. Rotator cuff problems account for up to 70% of shoulder pain problems and are the third most prevalent musculoskeletal disorder after those occurring in the lower back and neck. Rotator cuff surgery has high failure rates (25–50% within 12 months), and as a result, there is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff surgery. Patch augmented surgery for rotator cuff repairs has recently been developed and is increasingly being used within the UK National Health Service. Patch augmented surgery could lead to a dramatic improvement in patient and surgical outcomes, but its clinical and cost effectiveness needs rigorous evaluation. The existing evidence on the use of patches may be at risk of bias as currently only a small number of single-centre comparative studies appear to have been carried out. Additionally, it is unclear for which patches a clinical study (comparative and non-comparative) has been conducted. This paper outlines the protocol for a systematic review intended to summarise the best available clinical evidence and will indicate what further research is required.

Methods

Electronic databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) will be systematically searched between April 2006 and the present day for relevant publications using a specified search strategy, which can be adapted for the use in multiple electronic databases, and inclusion criteria. Screening of both titles and abstracts will be done by two independent reviewers with any discrepancies resolved by a third independent reviewer. Data extraction will include information regarding the type of participants, type of intervention and outcomes including but not limited to shoulder-specific function and pain scores, patch-related adverse events and type of study. The results will be summarised in a narrative review where qualitative analysis is not possible.

Discussion

This review aims to collate the current evidence base regarding the use of patches to augment rotator cuff repair. The results of this review will help to develop, using consensus methods, the design of a definitive randomised trial assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a patch to augment surgical repair of the rotator cuff that is both acceptable to stakeholders and is feasible.

Systematic review registration

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Linsell L, et al. Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(2):215–21.CrossRef Linsell L, et al. Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(2):215–21.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference van der Windt DA, et al. Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46(410):519–23.PubMedPubMedCentral van der Windt DA, et al. Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46(410):519–23.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Chaudhury S, et al. Surgical options for patients with shoulder pain. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(4):217–26.CrossRef Chaudhury S, et al. Surgical options for patients with shoulder pain. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(4):217–26.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kulkarni R, et al. BESS/BOA patient care pathways: subacromial shoulder pain. Should Elb. 2015;7(2):135–43.CrossRef Kulkarni R, et al. BESS/BOA patient care pathways: subacromial shoulder pain. Should Elb. 2015;7(2):135–43.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Matthews TJ, et al. Pathology of the torn rotator cuff tendon. Reduction in potential for repair as tear size increases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(4):489–95.CrossRef Matthews TJ, et al. Pathology of the torn rotator cuff tendon. Reduction in potential for repair as tear size increases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(4):489–95.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Carr AJ, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK rotator cuff surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial]. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(80):1–218.CrossRef Carr AJ, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK rotator cuff surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial]. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(80):1–218.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Judge A, et al. Temporal trends and geographical variation in the use of subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair of the shoulder in England. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(1):70–4.CrossRef Judge A, et al. Temporal trends and geographical variation in the use of subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair of the shoulder in England. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(1):70–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Boileau P, et al. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1229–40.PubMed Boileau P, et al. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1229–40.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Coghlan JA, et al. Surgery for rotator cuff disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD005619. Coghlan JA, et al. Surgery for rotator cuff disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD005619.
10.
go back to reference Barber FA, et al. A prospective, randomized evaluation of acellular human dermal matrix augmentation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(1):8–15.CrossRef Barber FA, et al. A prospective, randomized evaluation of acellular human dermal matrix augmentation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(1):8–15.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ferguson DP, et al. Graft utilization in the augmentation of large-to-massive rotator cuff repairs: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(11):2984–92.CrossRef Ferguson DP, et al. Graft utilization in the augmentation of large-to-massive rotator cuff repairs: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(11):2984–92.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wong I, Burns J, Snyder S. Arthroscopic GraftJacket repair of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(2 Suppl):104–9.CrossRef Wong I, Burns J, Snyder S. Arthroscopic GraftJacket repair of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(2 Suppl):104–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Buchbinder R, Green S, Youd JM. Corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD004016. Buchbinder R, Green S, Youd JM. Corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD004016.
15.
go back to reference Smith, R.D.J., Investigating the role of scaffolds for rotator cuff repair. 2016, Thesis (D.Phil.)--University of Oxford, 2017, (Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, ; St Cross College.). Smith, R.D.J., Investigating the role of scaffolds for rotator cuff repair. 2016, Thesis (D.Phil.)--University of Oxford, 2017, (Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, ; St Cross College.).
16.
go back to reference Smith RD, et al. The response of tenocytes to commercial scaffolds used for rotator cuff repair. Eur Cell Mater. 2016;31:107–18.CrossRef Smith RD, et al. The response of tenocytes to commercial scaffolds used for rotator cuff repair. Eur Cell Mater. 2016;31:107–18.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Iannotti JP, et al. Porcine small intestine submucosa augmentation of surgical repair of chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tears. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(6):1238–44.CrossRef Iannotti JP, et al. Porcine small intestine submucosa augmentation of surgical repair of chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tears. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(6):1238–44.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mori D, Funakoshi N, Yamashita F. Arthroscopic surgery of irreparable large or massive rotator cuff tears with low-grade fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus: patch autograft procedure versus partial repair procedure. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(12):1911–21.CrossRef Mori D, Funakoshi N, Yamashita F. Arthroscopic surgery of irreparable large or massive rotator cuff tears with low-grade fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus: patch autograft procedure versus partial repair procedure. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(12):1911–21.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hakimi O, et al. An electrospun polydioxanone patch for the localisation of biological therapies during tendon repair. Eur Cell Mater. 2012;24:344–57 discussion 357.CrossRef Hakimi O, et al. An electrospun polydioxanone patch for the localisation of biological therapies during tendon repair. Eur Cell Mater. 2012;24:344–57 discussion 357.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shea KP, et al. Human tendon cell response to 7 commercially available extracellular matrix materials: an in vitro study. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(9):1181–8.CrossRef Shea KP, et al. Human tendon cell response to 7 commercially available extracellular matrix materials: an in vitro study. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(9):1181–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ciampi P, et al. The benefit of synthetic versus biological patch augmentation in the repair of posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears: a 3-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(5):1169–75.CrossRef Ciampi P, et al. The benefit of synthetic versus biological patch augmentation in the repair of posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears: a 3-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(5):1169–75.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Walton JR, et al. Restore orthobiologic implant: not recommended for augmentation of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):786–91.PubMed Walton JR, et al. Restore orthobiologic implant: not recommended for augmentation of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):786–91.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Thangarajah T, et al. Augmentation of rotator cuff repair with soft tissue scaffolds. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(6):2325967115587495.CrossRef Thangarajah T, et al. Augmentation of rotator cuff repair with soft tissue scaffolds. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(6):2325967115587495.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. 2011: The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. 2011: The Cochrane Collaboration.
Metadata
Title
Systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol
Authors
Gemma Greenall
Andrew Carr
David Beard
Jonathan Rees
Amar Rangan
Naomi Merritt
Melina Dritsaki
Navraj S. Nagra
Mathew Baldwin
Sally Hopewell
Jonathan A. Cook
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0851-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Systematic Reviews 1/2018 Go to the issue