Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Systematic Reviews
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Protocol

Barriers to access and utilization of emergency obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa—a systematic review protocol

Authors: Ayele Geleto, Catherine Chojenta, Abdulbasit Mussa, Deborah Loxton

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Nearly 15% of all pregnancies end in fatal perinatal obstetric complications including bleeding, infections, hypertension, obstructed labor, and complications of abortion. Between 1990 and 2015, an estimated 10.7 million women died due to obstetric complications. Almost all of these deaths (99%) happened in developing countries, and 66% of maternal deaths were attributed to sub-Saharan Africa. The majority of cases of maternal mortalities can be prevented through provision of evidence-based potentially life-saving signal functions of emergency obstetric care. However, different factors can hinder women’s ability to access and use emergency obstetric services in sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, the aim of this review is to synthesize current evidence on barriers to accessing and utilizing emergency obstetric care in sub-Saharan African. Decision-makers and policy formulators will use evidence generated from this review in improving maternal healthcare particularly the emergency obstetric care.

Methods

Electronic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Maternity and Infant Care will be searched for studies using predefined search terms. Articles published in English language between 2010 and 2017 with quantitative and qualitative design will be included. The identified papers will be assessed for meeting eligibility criteria. First, the articles will be screened by examining their titles and abstracts. Then, two reviewers will review the full text of the selected articles independently. Two reviewers using a standard data extraction format will undertake data extraction from the retained studies. The quality of the included papers will be assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool. Results from the eligible studies will be qualitatively synthesized using the narrative synthesis approach and reported using the three delays model. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist will be employed to present the findings.

Discussion

This systematic review will present a detailed synthesis of the evidence for barriers to access and utilization of emergency obstetric care in sub-Saharan Africa over the last 7 years. This systematic review is expected to provide clear information that can help in designing maternal health policy and interventions particularly in emergency obstetric care in sub-Saharan Africa where maternal mortality remains high.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42017074102.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
WHO, et al. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
2.
WHO, Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015 estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations population division. 2015.
3.
WHO. Maternal mortality fact sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
4.
Worku AG, Yalew AW, Afework MF. Maternal complications and women's behavior in seeking care from skilled providers in North Gondar, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Say L, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323–33.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Biswas AB, et al. Availability and Use of Emergency Obstetric Care Services in Four Districts of West Bengal, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2005;23(3):266–74.PubMed
7.
Birmeta K, Dibaba Y, Woldeyohannes D. Determinants of maternal health care utilization in Holeta town, Central Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Abera G, et al. Male partner role on reducing delay in decision to seek emergency obstetric care and associated factors among women admitted to maternity ward, in hospitals of North Showa, Amhara, Ethiopia. Gynecol Obstet. 2015;05(01)
9.
WHO, Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant. A joint statement by World Health Organization, International Confederation of Midwives, International federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva 2004.
10.
Paxton A, et al. The evidence for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;88(2):181–93.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Esena RK, Sappor M-M. Factors associated with the utilization of skilled delivery services in the Ga east municipality of Ghana part 2: barriers to skilled delivery. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2013;2(8):195–207.
12.
Ameh C, et al. Status of emergency obstetric care in six developing countries five years before the MDG targets for maternal and newborn health. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e49938.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
United Nations Population Fund. Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook. New York: World Health Organization; 2009.
14.
Columbia University, Using the UN process indicators of emergency obstetric services, AMDD workbook. 2003.
15.
Kassebaum NJ, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9947):980–1004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
CSA and ICF. Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey, key indicators. Addis Ababa Ethiopia: CSA; Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF; 2016.
17.
Buse K, Hawkes S. Health in the sustainable development goals: ready for a paradigm shift? Glob Health. 2015;11:13.CrossRef
18.
Freedman LP, et al. Practical lessons from global safe motherhood initiatives: time for a new focus on implementation. Lancet. 2007;370(9595):1383–91.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Miltenburg AS, et al. Assessing emergency obstetric and newborn care: can performance indicators capture health system weaknesses? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):92.CrossRef
20.
Ng'anjo Phiri S, et al. Rural-urban inequity in unmet obstetric needs and functionality of emergency obstetric care services in a Zambian district. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0145196.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Kongnyuy EJ, et al. Availability, utilisation and quality of basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric care services in Malawi. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13(5):687–94.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Federal Ministry of Health Ethiopia, Health sector development programme IV 2010/11–2014/15: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2010.
23.
Admasu K, Haile-Mariam A, Bailey P. Indicators for availability, utilization, and quality of emergency obstetric care in Ethiopia, 2008. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;115(1):101–5.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Teshoma KR, Eticha CT. Availability and quality of emergency obstetric and newborn care service in Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. J Women’s Health Care. 2016;5(5)
25.
Sabde Y, et al. The availability of emergency obstetric care in the context of the JSY cash transfer programme in Madhya Pradesh, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Mony PK, et al. Availability and distribution of emergency obstetric care services in Karnataka state, South India: access and equity considerations. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
28.
Demissie E, Dessie F. Level of awareness on danger signs of pregnancy among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Mizan Aman General Hospital, southwest, Ethiopia: institution based cross-sectional study. J Womens Health Care. 2015;04(08)
29.
August F, et al. Men’s knowledge of obstetric danger signs, birth preparedness and complication readiness in rural Tanzania. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125978.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Amenu G, et al. Knowledge about danger signs of obstetric complications and associated factors among postnatal mothers of Mechekel district health centers, east Gojjam zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2014. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:3495416.
31.
Ugwu NU, de Kok B. Socio-cultural factors, gender roles and religious ideologies contributing to caesarian-section refusal in Nigeria. Reprod Health. 2015;12:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Sikder SS, et al. Patterns and determinants of care seeking for obstetric complications in rural Northwest Bangladesh: analysis from a prospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Pacagnella RC, et al. Delays in receiving obstetric care and poor maternal outcomes: results from a national multicentre cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:159.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Nair M, et al. Facilitators and barriers to quality of care in maternal, newborn and child health: a global situational analysis through metareview. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004749.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Austin A, et al. Barriers to providing quality emergency obstetric care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: healthcare providers’ perspectives on training, referrals and supervision, a mixed methods study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Mohammed A, Hassen K, Akessa GM. Assessment of unmet need in emergency obstetric services in Tarcha General Hospital, Dawro Zone, South West Ethiopia. Health Sci J. 2015;9(6:4):1–8.
37.
Fikre R. Factors that can affect the quality of emergency obstetric care in the health center level in developing countries: a systematic review of the literature. Pyrex J Nurs Midwifery. 2016;2(2):7–11.
38.
Kyei-Nimakoh M, Carolan-Olah M, McCann TV. Access barriers to obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa—a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Bohren MA, et al. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMC Reproductive Health. 2014;11:71.CrossRef
40.
Banke-Thomas A, et al. Assessing emergency obstetric care provision in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the application of global guidelines. Glob Health Action. 2016;9(1):31880.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(8):1091–110.CrossRefPubMed
42.
43.
44.
Pluye P, et al. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(4):529–46.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Pace R, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(1):47–53.CrossRefPubMed
46.
47.
48.
The Joanna Briggs Institute, JBI data extraction form for review for systematic reviews and research syntheses. 2014.
49.
Mgawadere F, et al. Factors associated with maternal mortality in Malawi: application of the three delays model. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):219.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Mateen A, Shaikh BT, Kumar R. Emergency obstetrics care services in District Neelum, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2013;25(1–2):194–7.PubMed
51.
Alvaro JMS, Oducado RMF. Maternal profile, awareness and utilization of basic emergency obstetrics and newborn care (BEmONC) in a rural municipality in Iloilo, Philippines. Asia Pac J Educ, Arts Sci. 2015;2(1):6–13.
52.
Teng SP, et al. Knowledge of pregnancy danger signs and associated factors among Malaysian mothers. British J Midwifery. 2015;23(11):800–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Barriers to access and utilization of emergency obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa—a systematic review protocol
Authors
Ayele Geleto
Catherine Chojenta
Abdulbasit Mussa
Deborah Loxton
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0720-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Systematic Reviews 1/2018 Go to the issue

Protocol

Barriers, supports, and effective interventions for uptake of human papillomavirus- and other vaccines within global and Canadian Indigenous peoples: a systematic review protocol

Protocol

Health technology assessment of public health interventions: an analysis of characteristics and comparison of methods—study protocol

Protocol

Digital storytelling as a method in health research: a systematic review protocol

Research

Interventions integrating health and academic interventions to prevent substance use and violence: a systematic review and synthesis of process evaluations

Protocol

(Update of a) systematic review on the impact of elective early term (< 39th gestational week) caesarean sections on maternal and neonatal health - a protocol

Protocol

A protocol for a network meta-analysis of interventions to treat patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss