Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Protocol

Sex and gender considerations in transplantation research: protocol for a scoping review

Authors: Claudie Laprise, Vikas Srinivasan Sridhar, Lori West, Bethany Foster, Louise Pilote, Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the growing appreciation of the importance of sex and gender considerations in transplantation research, there is currently no framework or good practice guidelines for the appropriate handling of sex and gender issues in human allotransplantation research.

Methods

We will conduct a scoping review to synthesize the evidence on how matters of sex and gender have been handled in human allotransplantation research. We will survey the literature discussing sex and gender in relation to transplantation, including adult and pediatric patients, hematopoietic and solid organ transplant recipients as well as organ donors. We will search MEDLINE and Embase for literature discussing sex and gender in relation to transplantation. Two reviewers will independently evaluate the eligibility of all identified titles and abstracts for inclusion in the full text review, as well as data extraction. Descriptive data and information on how sex and gender have been considered in human transplantation research will be reported.

Discussion

This scoping review will be an important stepping stone towards the development of good practice guidelines on study design and analysis considerations when handling sex and gender issues in human transplantation research. This scoping review can also help identify methodological issues that restrict the translation of transplantation research findings into clinical practice related to underestimation of sex/gender differences. This review will ultimately identify major gaps, inform donor-recipient selection, guide personalized interventions, and prioritize research recommendations in human transplantation research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in health. Science & Society Series on Sex and Science. EMBO Rep 2012;13: 596–603. Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in health. Science & Society Series on Sex and Science. EMBO Rep 2012;13: 596–603.
3.
go back to reference De Castro P, Heidari S, Babor TF. Sex and gender equity in research (SAGER): reporting guidelines as a framework of innovation for an equitable approach to gender medicine. Commentary. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(2):154–7.PubMed De Castro P, Heidari S, Babor TF. Sex and gender equity in research (SAGER): reporting guidelines as a framework of innovation for an equitable approach to gender medicine. Commentary. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(2):154–7.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Franconi F, Campesi I. Sex and gender influences on pharmacological response: an overview. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2014;7(4):469–85.CrossRefPubMed Franconi F, Campesi I. Sex and gender influences on pharmacological response: an overview. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2014;7(4):469–85.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pelletier R, et al. Sex versus gender-related characteristics: which predicts outcome after acute coronary syndrome in the young? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(2):127–35.CrossRefPubMed Pelletier R, et al. Sex versus gender-related characteristics: which predicts outcome after acute coronary syndrome in the young? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(2):127–35.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Peters MD, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–6.CrossRefPubMed Peters MD, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tricco A, et al. Scoping reviews versus systematic reviews: results from a scoping review of scoping reviews. In: Filtering the information overload for better decisions, Abstracts of the 23rd Cochrane Colloquium; 2015 3-7 Oct; Vienna, Austria: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. Tricco A, et al. Scoping reviews versus systematic reviews: results from a scoping review of scoping reviews. In: Filtering the information overload for better decisions, Abstracts of the 23rd Cochrane Colloquium; 2015 3-7 Oct; Vienna, Austria: John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
Metadata
Title
Sex and gender considerations in transplantation research: protocol for a scoping review
Authors
Claudie Laprise
Vikas Srinivasan Sridhar
Lori West
Bethany Foster
Louise Pilote
Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0578-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue