Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Protocol

Structural barriers in access to medical marijuana in the USA—a systematic review protocol

Authors: Celina I. Valencia, Ibitola O. Asaolu, John E. Ehiri, Cecilia Rosales

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are 43 state medical marijuana programs in the USA, yet limited evidence is available on the demographic characteristics of the patient population accessing these programs. Moreover, insights into the social and structural barriers that inform patients’ success in accessing medical marijuana are limited. A current gap in the scientific literature exists regarding generalizable data on the social, cultural, and structural mechanisms that hinder access to medical marijuana among qualifying patients. The goal of this systematic review, therefore, is to identify the aforementioned mechanisms that inform disparities in access to medical marijuana in the USA.

Methods

This scoping review protocol outlines the proposed study design for the systematic review and evaluation of peer-reviewed scientific literature on structural barriers to medical marijuana access. The protocol follows the guidelines set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist.

Discussion

The overarching goal of this study is to rigorously evaluate the existing peer-reviewed data on access to medical marijuana in the USA. Income, ethnic background, stigma, and physician preferences have been posited as the primary structural barriers influencing medical marijuana patient population demographics in the USA. Identification of structural barriers to accessing medical marijuana provides a framework for future policies and programs. Evidence-based policies and programs for increasing medical marijuana access help minimize the disparity of access among qualifying patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Desai U, Patel P. Medical marijuana: a public health perspective. 2013. Desai U, Patel P. Medical marijuana: a public health perspective. 2013.
5.
go back to reference Cerdá M, Wall M, Keyes KM, Galea S, Hasin D. Medical marijuana laws in 50 states: investigating the relationship between state legalization of medical marijuana and marijuana use, abuse and dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;120(1):22–7. Cerdá M, Wall M, Keyes KM, Galea S, Hasin D. Medical marijuana laws in 50 states: investigating the relationship between state legalization of medical marijuana and marijuana use, abuse and dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;120(1):22–7.
7.
8.
go back to reference Friesthler B, Gruenewald PJ. Examining the relationship between the physical availability of medical marijuana and marijuana use across fifty California cities. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;143:244–50.CrossRef Friesthler B, Gruenewald PJ. Examining the relationship between the physical availability of medical marijuana and marijuana use across fifty California cities. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;143:244–50.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Richmond MK, Pampel FC, Rivera LS, Broderick KB, Reimann B, Fischer L. Frequency and risk of marijuana use among substance-using health care patients in Colorado with and without access to state legalized medical marijuana. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2015;47(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed Richmond MK, Pampel FC, Rivera LS, Broderick KB, Reimann B, Fischer L. Frequency and risk of marijuana use among substance-using health care patients in Colorado with and without access to state legalized medical marijuana. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2015;47(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Reinarman C, Nunberg H, Lanthier F, Heddleston T. Who are medical marijuana patients? Population characteristics from nine California assessment clinics. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2011;43(2):128–35.CrossRefPubMed Reinarman C, Nunberg H, Lanthier F, Heddleston T. Who are medical marijuana patients? Population characteristics from nine California assessment clinics. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2011;43(2):128–35.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Menjívar C. Liminal legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants’ lives in the United States 1. Am J Sociol. 2006;111(4):999–1037.CrossRef Menjívar C. Liminal legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants’ lives in the United States 1. Am J Sociol. 2006;111(4):999–1037.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kochhar R, Fry R. Wealth inequality has widened along racial, ethnic lines since end of Great Recession. Pew Res Center. 2014;12. Kochhar R, Fry R. Wealth inequality has widened along racial, ethnic lines since end of Great Recession. Pew Res Center. 2014;12.
13.
go back to reference Chu YWL. The effects of medical marijuana laws on illegal marijuana use. J Health Econ. 2014;38:43–61.CrossRefPubMed Chu YWL. The effects of medical marijuana laws on illegal marijuana use. J Health Econ. 2014;38:43–61.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pacula RL, Powell D, Heaton P, Sevigny EL. Assessing the Effects of Medical Marijuana Laws on Marijuana Use: The Devil is in the Details. J Policy Anal Manage. 2015;34(1):7–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pacula RL, Powell D, Heaton P, Sevigny EL. Assessing the Effects of Medical Marijuana Laws on Marijuana Use: The Devil is in the Details. J Policy Anal Manage. 2015;34(1):7–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Michalec B, Rapp L. Medical marijuana: the importance of education and research. Del Med J. 2014;86(11):333–5.PubMed Michalec B, Rapp L. Medical marijuana: the importance of education and research. Del Med J. 2014;86(11):333–5.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 22 July 2017. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Available from www.​handbook.​cochrane.​org. Accessed 22 July 2017.
20.
go back to reference Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on systematic reviews: beyond the basics. Oxford: Center for Statistics in Medicine; 2000. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on systematic reviews: beyond the basics. Oxford: Center for Statistics in Medicine; 2000.
23.
go back to reference Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ. 2008;337(aug073):a1035–a1035. Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ. 2008;337(aug073):a1035–a1035.
26.
go back to reference Farmer P, Bourgois P, Scheper Hughes N, Fassin D, Green L, Heggenhougen HK, … Farmer P. An anthropology of structural violence 1. Curr Anthropol. 2004;45(3):305–25. Farmer P, Bourgois P, Scheper Hughes N, Fassin D, Green L, Heggenhougen HK, … Farmer P. An anthropology of structural violence 1. Curr Anthropol. 2004;45(3):305–25.
27.
go back to reference Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, … Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, … Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.
Metadata
Title
Structural barriers in access to medical marijuana in the USA—a systematic review protocol
Authors
Celina I. Valencia
Ibitola O. Asaolu
John E. Ehiri
Cecilia Rosales
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0541-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue