Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Protocol

Determinants and materno-fetal outcomes related to cesarean section delivery in private and public hospitals in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Authors: Idrissa Beogo, Bomar Mendez Rojas, Marie-Pierre Gagnon

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the well-established morbidity, mortality, long-term effects, and unnecessary extra-cost burden associated with cesarean section delivery (CSD) worldwide, its rate has grown exponentially. This has become a great topical challenge for the international healthcare community and individual countries. Estimated at three times the acceptable rate as defined by the World Health Organization in 1985, the continued upward trend has been fuelled by higher income countries. Some low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have now taken the lead, and the factors contributing to this situation are poorly understood. The expansion of the private healthcare sector may be playing a significant role. Distinguishing between the public and private hospitals’ role is critical in this investigation as it has not yet been approached. This review aims to systematically synthesize knowledge on the determinants of the CSD rate rise in private and public hospitals in LMICs and to investigate materno-fetal and materno-infant outcomes of CSD in perinatal period, between private and public hospitals.

Methods/design

We will include studies published in English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese since 2000, using any experimental design, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, quasi-experimental, before and after studies, and interrupted time series. Outcomes of interest are the determinants of CSD and materno-fetal and materno-infant outcomes. We will only include studies carried out in private and public hospitals in LMICs. The literature searches will be conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane database, LILACS, and HINARI. We will also include unpublished studies in the gray literature (theses and technical reports). Using the two-person approach, two independent review authors will screen eligible articles, extract data, and assess risk of bias. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion with a third author. Results will be presented as structured summaries of the included studies. If possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted and, subsequently, an analysis for heterogeneity will be implemented.

Discussion

The proposed systematic review of the CSD rate rise will provide up-to-date evidence in regard to differences in proportions, determinants, and materno-fetal and materno-infant outcomes in perinatal period, between private and public hospitals in LMICs. We believe that this knowledge synthesis will help to shed light on the evidence and support evidence-informed decision-making with a view to addressing the issue in LMICs.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42016036871
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436–7. World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436–7.
3.
go back to reference Chung SH, Seol HJ, Choi YS, Oh SY, Kim A, Bae CW. Changes in the cesarean section rate in Korea (1982–2012) and a review of the associated factors. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(10):1341–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chung SH, Seol HJ, Choi YS, Oh SY, Kim A, Bae CW. Changes in the cesarean section rate in Korea (1982–2012) and a review of the associated factors. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(10):1341–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(5):235–41.CrossRefPubMed Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(5):235–41.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Barros F, Vaughan J, Victoria C, Huttly S. Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil. Lancet. 1991;338:167.CrossRefPubMed Barros F, Vaughan J, Victoria C, Huttly S. Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil. Lancet. 1991;338:167.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Feng XL, Xu L, Guo Y, Ronsmans C. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(1):30–39A.CrossRefPubMed Feng XL, Xu L, Guo Y, Ronsmans C. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(1):30–39A.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Deneux-Tharaux C, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle M-H. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3):541–8.CrossRefPubMed Deneux-Tharaux C, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle M-H. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3):541–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Grivell RM, Dodd JM. Short- and long-term outcomes after cesarean section. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;6(2):205–2015.CrossRef Grivell RM, Dodd JM. Short- and long-term outcomes after cesarean section. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;6(2):205–2015.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):21–6.CrossRefPubMed Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):21–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Gonzales GF, Tapia VL, Fort AL, Betran AP. Pregnancy outcomes associated with Cesarean deliveries in Peruvian public health facilities. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:637–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gonzales GF, Tapia VL, Fort AL, Betran AP. Pregnancy outcomes associated with Cesarean deliveries in Peruvian public health facilities. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:637–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
go back to reference Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(29–30):489–95.PubMedPubMedCentral Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(29–30):489–95.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Patterson LS, O’Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity associated with classic and inverted T cesarean incisions. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(4):633–7.PubMed Patterson LS, O’Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity associated with classic and inverted T cesarean incisions. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(4):633–7.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Marrs CC, Moussa HN, Sibai BM, Blackwell SC. The relationship between primary cesarean delivery skin incision type and wound complications in women with morbid obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(4):319 e311–e314.CrossRef Marrs CC, Moussa HN, Sibai BM, Blackwell SC. The relationship between primary cesarean delivery skin incision type and wound complications in women with morbid obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(4):319 e311–e314.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cho CE, Norman M. Cesarean section and development of the immune system in the offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):249–54.CrossRefPubMed Cho CE, Norman M. Cesarean section and development of the immune system in the offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):249–54.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Almgren M, Schlinzig T, Gomez-Cabrero D, Gunnar A, Sundin M, Johansson S, Norman M, Ekstrom TJ. Cesarean delivery and hematopoietic stem cell epigenetics in the newborn infant: implications for future health? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:502 e501–e508.CrossRef Almgren M, Schlinzig T, Gomez-Cabrero D, Gunnar A, Sundin M, Johansson S, Norman M, Ekstrom TJ. Cesarean delivery and hematopoietic stem cell epigenetics in the newborn infant: implications for future health? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:502 e501–e508.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Torres JA, Domingues RMSM, Sandall J, Hartz Z, Gama SGN, Filha MMT, Schilithz AOC, Leal MC. Cesariana e resultados neonatais em hospitais privados no Brasil: estudo comparativo de dois diferentes modelos de atenção perinatal. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2014;30:S220–31.CrossRef Torres JA, Domingues RMSM, Sandall J, Hartz Z, Gama SGN, Filha MMT, Schilithz AOC, Leal MC. Cesariana e resultados neonatais em hospitais privados no Brasil: estudo comparativo de dois diferentes modelos de atenção perinatal. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2014;30:S220–31.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Murray SF. Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study. BMJ. 2000;321:1501–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Murray SF. Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study. BMJ. 2000;321:1501–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Potter JE, Berquó E, Perpétuo IHO, Leal OF, Hopkins K, Souza MR, Formiga MCC. Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. BMJ. 2001;323:1155–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Potter JE, Berquó E, Perpétuo IHO, Leal OF, Hopkins K, Souza MR, Formiga MCC. Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. BMJ. 2001;323:1155–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference SK S, Padmadas SS, AK KR, Nair SB. Caesarean section delivery in Kerala, India: evidence from a National Family Health Survey. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:511–21.CrossRef SK S, Padmadas SS, AK KR, Nair SB. Caesarean section delivery in Kerala, India: evidence from a National Family Health Survey. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:511–21.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Declercq E. Childbirth in Brazil: challenging an interventionist paradigm. BIRTH. 2015;42(1):1–4.CrossRefPubMed Declercq E. Childbirth in Brazil: challenging an interventionist paradigm. BIRTH. 2015;42(1):1–4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hopkins K, de Lima Amaral EF, Mourao AN. The impact of payment source and hospital type on rising cesarean section rates in Brazil, 1998 to 2008. Birth. 2014;41(2):169–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hopkins K, de Lima Amaral EF, Mourao AN. The impact of payment source and hospital type on rising cesarean section rates in Brazil, 1998 to 2008. Birth. 2014;41(2):169–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Sufang G. Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China. Bull World Health Org Suppl. 2007;85(10):755–62.CrossRef Sufang G. Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China. Bull World Health Org Suppl. 2007;85(10):755–62.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Abergavenny RD. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales hits 21%. BMJ. 2001;323:951. Abergavenny RD. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales hits 21%. BMJ. 2001;323:951.
30.
go back to reference Langer A, Villar J. Promoting evidence based practice in maternal care: would keep the knife away. BMJ. 2002;324:942–5.CrossRef Langer A, Villar J. Promoting evidence based practice in maternal care: would keep the knife away. BMJ. 2002;324:942–5.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1607–17.CrossRefPubMed Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1607–17.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Gutierrez L, Gibbons L, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Izbizky GH, Ferrary M, Viergue N, Vigil SI, et al. Women’s preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Gutierrez L, Gibbons L, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Izbizky GH, Ferrary M, Viergue N, Vigil SI, et al. Women’s preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy DK. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. BIRTH. 2007;34(1):65–79.CrossRefPubMed McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy DK. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. BIRTH. 2007;34(1):65–79.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Cavallaro FL, Cresswell JA, Franca GV, Victora CG, Barros AJ, Ronsmans C. Trends in caesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile: cross-sectional surveys in southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(12):914–922D.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cavallaro FL, Cresswell JA, Franca GV, Victora CG, Barros AJ, Ronsmans C. Trends in caesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile: cross-sectional surveys in southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(12):914–922D.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308.CrossRefPubMed Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Gama SGN, Viellas EF, Schilithz AOC, Filha MMT, Carvalho ML, Gomes KRO, Costa MCO, Leal MC. Fatores associados à cesariana entre primíparas adolescentes no Brasil, 2011–2012. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2014;30:S117–27.CrossRef Gama SGN, Viellas EF, Schilithz AOC, Filha MMT, Carvalho ML, Gomes KRO, Costa MCO, Leal MC. Fatores associados à cesariana entre primíparas adolescentes no Brasil, 2011–2012. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2014;30:S117–27.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Arrieta A. Health reform and cesarean sections in the private sector: the experience of Peru. Health Policy. 2011;99(2):124–30.CrossRefPubMed Arrieta A. Health reform and cesarean sections in the private sector: the experience of Peru. Health Policy. 2011;99(2):124–30.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Rebelo F, da Rocha CM, Cortes TR, Dutra CL, Kac G. High cesarean prevalence in a national population-based study in Brazil: the role of private practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(7):903–8.CrossRefPubMed Rebelo F, da Rocha CM, Cortes TR, Dutra CL, Kac G. High cesarean prevalence in a national population-based study in Brazil: the role of private practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(7):903–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Vieira GO, Fernandes LG, de Oliveira NF, Silva LR, Vieira Tde O. Factors associated with cesarean delivery in public and private hospitals in a city of northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vieira GO, Fernandes LG, de Oliveira NF, Silva LR, Vieira Tde O. Factors associated with cesarean delivery in public and private hospitals in a city of northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Bennett S. Promoting the private sector: a review of developing country trends. Health Policy Plan. 1992;7(2):97–110.CrossRef Bennett S. Promoting the private sector: a review of developing country trends. Health Policy Plan. 1992;7(2):97–110.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Beogo I, Liu CY, Chou YJ, Chen CY, Huang N. Health-care-seeking patterns in the emerging private sector in Burkina Faso: a population-based study of urban adult residents in Ouagadougou. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97521.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beogo I, Liu CY, Chou YJ, Chen CY, Huang N. Health-care-seeking patterns in the emerging private sector in Burkina Faso: a population-based study of urban adult residents in Ouagadougou. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97521.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pmed.​1000097.
47.
go back to reference JBI: Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2011 Edition edn. Adelaide; 2011 JBI: Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2011 Edition edn. Adelaide; 2011
48.
go back to reference Pluye P, Gagnon MP, Griffiths F, Johnson-Lafleur J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(4):529–46.CrossRefPubMed Pluye P, Gagnon MP, Griffiths F, Johnson-Lafleur J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(4):529–46.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Determinants and materno-fetal outcomes related to cesarean section delivery in private and public hospitals in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Authors
Idrissa Beogo
Bomar Mendez Rojas
Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0402-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue