Top

Systematic Reviews

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Protocol

Incidence, prevalence and genetic determinants of neonatal diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Authors: Jobert Richie N. Nansseu, Suzanne S. Ngo-Um, Eric V. Balti

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2016

Abstract

Background

In the absence of existing data, the present review intends to determine the incidence, prevalence and/or genetic determinants of neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM), with expected contribution to disease characterization.

Methods

We will include cross-sectional, cohort or case-control studies which have reported the incidence, prevalence and/or genetic determinants of NDM between January 01, 2000 and May 31, 2016, published in English or French languages and without any geographical limitation. PubMed and EMBASE will be extensively screened to identify potentially eligible studies, completed by manual search. Two authors will independently screen, select studies, extract data, and assess the risk of bias; disagreements will be resolved by consensus. Clinical heterogeneity will be investigated by examining the design and setting (including geographic region), procedure used for genetic testing, calculation of incidence or prevalence, and outcomes in each study. Studies found to be clinically homogeneous will be pooled together through a random effects meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed using the chi-square test of homogeneity and quantified using the I² statistic. In case of substantial heterogeneity, subgroup analyses will be undertaken. Publication bias will be assessed with funnel plots, complemented with the use of Egger’s test of bias.

Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis is expected to draw a clear picture of phenotypic and genotypic presentations of NDM in order to better understand the condition and adequately address challenges in respect with its management.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42016039765

Available only for authorised users

Naylor RN, Greeley SA, Bell GI, Philipson LH. Genetics and pathophysiology of neonatal diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2011;2(3):158–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mackay DJ, Temple IK. Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus type 1. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010;154C(3):335–42.CrossRefPubMed

Habeb AM, Al-Magamsi MS, Eid IM, Ali MI, Hattersley AT, Hussain K, Ellard S. Incidence, genetics, and clinical phenotype of permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus in northwest Saudi Arabia. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13(6):499–505.CrossRefPubMed

Rearson MA, McKnight-Menci H, Steinkrauss L. Neonatal diabetes: current trends in diagnosis and management. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2011;36(1):17–22. quiz 23-14.CrossRefPubMed

Aguilar-Bryan L, Bryan J. Neonatal diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev. 2008;29(3):265–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Deeb A, Habeb A, Kaplan W, Attia S, Hadi S, Osman A, Al-Jubeh J, Flanagan S, DeFranco E, Ellard S. Genetic characteristics, clinical spectrum, and incidence of neonatal diabetes in the Emirate of AbuDhabi, United Arab Emirates. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170(3):602–9.CrossRefPubMed

De Franco E, Flanagan SE, Houghton JA, Lango Allen H, Mackay DJ, Temple IK, Ellard S, Hattersley AT. The effect of early, comprehensive genomic testing on clinical care in neonatal diabetes: an international cohort study. Lancet. 2015;386(9997):957–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Grulich-Henn J, Wagner V, Thon A, Schober E, Marg W, Kapellen TM, Haberland H, Raile K, Ellard S, Flanagan SE, et al. Entities and frequency of neonatal diabetes: data from the diabetes documentation and quality management system (DPV). Diabet Med. 2010;27(6):709–12.CrossRefPubMed

Wiedemann B, Schober E, Waldhoer T, Koehle J, Flanagan SE, Mackay DJ, Steichen E, Meraner D, Zimmerhackl LB, Hattersley AT, et al. Incidence of neonatal diabetes in Austria-calculation based on the Austrian Diabetes Register. Pediatr Diabetes. 2010;11(1):18–23.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Globa E, Zelinska N, Mackay DJ, Temple K, Houghton JA, Hattersley AT, Flanagan SE, Ellard S. Neonatal diabetes in Ukraine: incidence, genetics, clinical phenotype and treatment. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015;28(11-12):1279–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Iafusco D, Massa O, Pasquino B, Colombo C, Iughetti L, Bizzarri C, Mammì C, Lo Presti D, Suprani T, Schiaffini R, et al. Minimal incidence of neonatal/infancy onset diabetes in Italy is 1:90,000 live births. Acta Diabetol. 2012;49(5):405–8.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Sagen JV, Raeder H, Hathout E, Shehadeh N, Gudmundsson K, Baevre H, Abuelo D, Phornphutkul C, Molnes J, Bell GI, et al. Permanent neonatal diabetes due to mutations in KCNJ11 encoding Kir6.2: patient characteristics and initial response to sulfonylurea therapy. Diabetes. 2004;53(10):2713–8.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination: Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking systematic reviews in health care. In.: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2009. [http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/SysRev3.htm]. Accessed 31 July 2016.

14.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360–3.PubMed

17.

Wells G, Shea B, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2000. [http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp]. Accessed 31 July 2016.

18.

Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–63.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Incidence, prevalence and genetic determinants of neonatal diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Authors: Jobert Richie N. Nansseu
Suzanne S. Ngo-Um
Eric V. Balti
Publication date: 01-12-2016
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0369-3

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Incidence, prevalence and genetic determinants of neonatal diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Abstract

Background

Methods

Discussion

Systematic review registration

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Discussion

Systematic review registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial

Time to consider sharing data extracted from trials included in systematic reviews

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of orthodontic mini implants in clinical practice: a systematic review

Are digital interventions for smoking cessation in pregnancy effective? A systematic review protocol

Erratum to: A protocol for a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of blood markers, synovial fluid, and tissue testing in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI)

The relationship between central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol