Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Protocol

An evidence synthesis of the international knowledge base for new care models to inform and mobilise knowledge for multispecialty community providers (MCPs)

Authors: Alison Turner, Abeda Mulla, Andrew Booth, Shiona Aldridge, Sharon Stevens, Fraser Battye, Peter Spilsbury

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

NHS England’s Five Year Forward View (NHS England, Five Year Forward View, 2014) formally introduced a strategy for new models of care driven by simultaneous pressures to contain costs, improve care and deliver services closer to home through integrated models. This synthesis focuses on a multispecialty community provider (MCP) model. This new model of care seeks to overcome the limitations in current models of care, often based around single condition-focused pathways, in contrast to patient-focused delivery (Royal College of General Practitioners, The 2022 GP: compendium of evidence, 2012) which offers greater continuity of care in recognition of complex needs and multimorbidity.

Methods

The synthesis, an innovative combination of best fit framework synthesis and realist synthesis, will develop a “blueprint” which articulates how and why MCP models work, to inform design of future iterations of the MCP model. A systematic search will be conducted to identify research and practice-derived evidence to achieve a balance that captures the historical legacy of MCP models but focuses on contemporary evidence. Sources will include bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, HMIC and Cochrane Library; and grey literature sources. The Best Fit synthesis methodology will be combined with a synthesis following realist principles which are particularly suited to exploring what works, when, for whom and in what circumstances.

Discussion

The aim of this synthesis is to provide decision makers in health and social care with a practical evidence base relating to the multispecialty community provider (MCP) model of care.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42016039552.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference England NHS. Five Year Forward View. Leeds: NHS England; 2014. England NHS. Five Year Forward View. Leeds: NHS England; 2014.
2.
go back to reference National Audit Office. Emergency admissions to hospital: managing the demand. London: National Audit Office; 2013. National Audit Office. Emergency admissions to hospital: managing the demand. London: National Audit Office; 2013.
3.
go back to reference Royal College of Physicians. Care closer to home: narrative report. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012. Royal College of Physicians. Care closer to home: narrative report. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.
4.
go back to reference Foundation H. Getting out of hospital? London: Health Foundation; 2011. Foundation H. Getting out of hospital? London: Health Foundation; 2011.
5.
go back to reference Ham C, Dixon A, Brooke B. Transforming the delivery of health and social care: the case for fundamental change. London: King’s Fund; 2012. Ham C, Dixon A, Brooke B. Transforming the delivery of health and social care: the case for fundamental change. London: King’s Fund; 2012.
6.
go back to reference Future Hospital Commission. Future hospital: caring for medical patients. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2013. Future Hospital Commission. Future hospital: caring for medical patients. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2013.
7.
go back to reference England NHS. The forward view into action: registering interest to join the new models of care programme. Leeds: NHS England; 2015. England NHS. The forward view into action: registering interest to join the new models of care programme. Leeds: NHS England; 2015.
8.
go back to reference Royal College of General Practitioners. The 2022 GP: compendium of evidence. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2012. Royal College of General Practitioners. The 2022 GP: compendium of evidence. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2012.
9.
go back to reference Ham C, Walsh N. Lessons from experience: making integrated care happen at scale and pace. London: King’s Fund; 2013. Ham C, Walsh N. Lessons from experience: making integrated care happen at scale and pace. London: King’s Fund; 2013.
10.
go back to reference Corrigan P, Craig G, Hampson M, Baeck P, Langford K. People powered commissioning: embedding innovation in practice. London: Nesta; 2013. Corrigan P, Craig G, Hampson M, Baeck P, Langford K. People powered commissioning: embedding innovation in practice. London: Nesta; 2013.
11.
go back to reference England NHS. The forward view into action: new care models: update and initial support. Leeds: NHS England; 2015. England NHS. The forward view into action: new care models: update and initial support. Leeds: NHS England; 2015.
12.
go back to reference Treasury HM. The magenta book: guidance for evaluation. London: HM Treasury; 2011. Treasury HM. The magenta book: guidance for evaluation. London: HM Treasury; 2011.
13.
go back to reference Denyer D, Tranfield D. Producing a systematic review. In: Buchanan DA, Bryman A, editors. The SAGE handboook of organizational research methods. London: Sage; 2009. p. 671–89. Denyer D, Tranfield D. Producing a systematic review. In: Buchanan DA, Bryman A, editors. The SAGE handboook of organizational research methods. London: Sage; 2009. p. 671–89.
14.
go back to reference Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Carroll C, Booth A, Wong R. Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Inf Libr J. 2009;27:114–22.CrossRef Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Carroll C, Booth A, Wong R. Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Inf Libr J. 2009;27:114–22.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Westhorp G. Realist impact evaluation. Overseas Development Institute; 2014 Westhorp G. Realist impact evaluation. Overseas Development Institute; 2014
16.
go back to reference McPake B, Mills A. What can we learn from international comparisons of health systems and health system reform? Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(6):811–20.PubMedPubMedCentral McPake B, Mills A. What can we learn from international comparisons of health systems and health system reform? Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(6):811–20.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.CrossRefPubMed Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ham C, Dixon J, Chantler C. Clinically integrated systems: the future of NHS reform in England? BMJ. 2011;342:d905.CrossRefPubMed Ham C, Dixon J, Chantler C. Clinically integrated systems: the future of NHS reform in England? BMJ. 2011;342:d905.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Williams I, Glasby J. Making ‘what works’ work: the use of knowledge in UK health and social care decision-making. Policy and Society. 2010;29:95–102.CrossRef Williams I, Glasby J. Making ‘what works’ work: the use of knowledge in UK health and social care decision-making. Policy and Society. 2010;29:95–102.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pawson R, Greenhalgh J, Brennan C. Demand management for planned care: a realist synthesis. Health Services and Delivery Research 2016, 4(2) Pawson R, Greenhalgh J, Brennan C. Demand management for planned care: a realist synthesis. Health Services and Delivery Research 2016, 4(2)
23.
go back to reference Antunes V, Moreira JP. Approaches to developing integrated care in Europe: a systematic literature review. Journal of Management and Marketing in Healthcare. 2011;4(2):129–35.CrossRef Antunes V, Moreira JP. Approaches to developing integrated care in Europe: a systematic literature review. Journal of Management and Marketing in Healthcare. 2011;4(2):129–35.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nolte E, Mckee M, editors. Integration and chronic care: a review. Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press; 2008. Nolte E, Mckee M, editors. Integration and chronic care: a review. Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press; 2008.
26.
go back to reference Shaw S, Rosen R, Rumbold B. What is integrated care?: an overview of integrated care in the NHS. Research report. London: Nuffield Trust; 2011. Shaw S, Rosen R, Rumbold B. What is integrated care?: an overview of integrated care in the NHS. Research report. London: Nuffield Trust; 2011.
27.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, Shaw RL, Smith JA, Young B. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res. 2006;6:27–44.CrossRef Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, Shaw RL, Smith JA, Young B. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res. 2006;6:27–44.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Daly J, Willis K, Small R, Green J, Welch N, Kealy M, Hughes E. A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:43–9.CrossRefPubMed Daly J, Willis K, Small R, Green J, Welch N, Kealy M, Hughes E. A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:43–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL. Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11(4):522–37.CrossRefPubMed Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL. Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11(4):522–37.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Carroll C, Booth A, Cooper K. A worked example of “best fit” framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carroll C, Booth A, Cooper K. A worked example of “best fit” framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
34.
go back to reference Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: Sage; 2006.CrossRef Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: Sage; 2006.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, DeCorby K, Bucknall TK, Kent B, Schultz A, Snelgrove-Clarke E, Stetler CB, Titler M, Wallin L, Wilson V. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, DeCorby K, Bucknall TK, Kent B, Schultz A, Snelgrove-Clarke E, Stetler CB, Titler M, Wallin L, Wilson V. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Davies HTO, Powell AE, Nutley SM. Mobilising knowledge to improve UK health care: learning from other countries and other sectors – a multimethod mapping study. Health Services and Delivery Research 2015;3(27). doi: 10.3310/hsdr03270 Davies HTO, Powell AE, Nutley SM. Mobilising knowledge to improve UK health care: learning from other countries and other sectors – a multimethod mapping study. Health Services and Delivery Research 2015;3(27). doi: 10.​3310/​hsdr03270
37.
go back to reference Polit DF, Beck CT. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47:1451–8.CrossRefPubMed Polit DF, Beck CT. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47:1451–8.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Colquhoun H, Leeman J, Michie S, Lokker C, Bragge P, Hempel S, McKibbon KA, Peter GY, Stevens KR, Wilson MG, Grimshaw J. Towards a common terminology: a simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies. Implement Sci. 2014;9:51.PubMedPubMedCentral Colquhoun H, Leeman J, Michie S, Lokker C, Bragge P, Hempel S, McKibbon KA, Peter GY, Stevens KR, Wilson MG, Grimshaw J. Towards a common terminology: a simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies. Implement Sci. 2014;9:51.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
An evidence synthesis of the international knowledge base for new care models to inform and mobilise knowledge for multispecialty community providers (MCPs)
Authors
Alison Turner
Abeda Mulla
Andrew Booth
Shiona Aldridge
Sharon Stevens
Fraser Battye
Peter Spilsbury
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0346-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Systematic Reviews 1/2016 Go to the issue