Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Protocol

Clinical effectiveness of cell therapies in patients with chronic liver disease and acute-on-chronic liver failure: a systematic review protocol

Authors: Nwe Ni Than, Claire L. Tomlinson, Debashis Haldar, Andrew L. King, David Moore, Philip N. Newsome

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major health burden worldwide. Liver cirrhosis, a form of CLD is the fifth most common cause of death in the UK. Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is the result of an acute insult superimposed on patients with liver cirrhosis as a result of precipitating events such as infection or bleeding. ACLF has a high associated mortality as a result of multi-organ failure. The only effective treatment for CLD is liver transplantation, but the treatment is limited by shortage of donor organs. As a result, alternative treatments such as cell therapies have been studied in patients with liver diseases. This study will systematically review the evidence on clinical effectiveness of cell therapies in patients.

Methods

All types of study design that investigate the effectiveness of cell therapies (haematopoietic, mesenchymal and unsorted cell types) of autologous or allogeneic origin and/or the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with CLD including ACLF will be included (except case reports). Both autologous and allogenic cell types will be included. The primary outcomes of interest are survival, model for end-stage liver disease score, quality of life and adverse events. Secondary outcomes include liver function tests, Child-Pugh score and events of liver decompensation. A literature search will be conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL, CDSR, DARE, HTA databases). Trial registers will be searched for ongoing trials, as will conference proceedings. Reference lists of relevant articles and systematic reviews will be screened. Randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence is likely to be scant; therefore, controlled trials and concurrently controlled observational studies will be primarily analysed and uncontrolled observational studies will be analysed where primary outcomes are not reported in the control studies or where uncontrolled studies have longer follow-up. Initial screening of studies will be carried by one reviewer with a proportion checked by another reviewer. Full-text selection will be performed by two reviewers independently against the pre-defined selection criteria. The data collection and the risk of bias assessment will be completed by one reviewer and counter checked by another reviewer for all selected studies. Where appropriate, data will be meta-analysed for each study design, therapy and outcome. Data specifically on ACLF will be treated as a subgroup.

Discussion

This systematic review will identify the available evidence on the effectiveness of cell therapies in patients with CLD and in ACLF subgroup. The findings will aid decision-making by clinicians and health service leaders.

Systematic review registration

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blachier M et al. The burden of liver disease in Europe: a review of available epidemiological data. J Hepatol. 2013;58(3):593–608.CrossRefPubMed Blachier M et al. The burden of liver disease in Europe: a review of available epidemiological data. J Hepatol. 2013;58(3):593–608.CrossRefPubMed
3.
7.
go back to reference Said A et al. Model for end stage liver disease score predicts mortality across a broad spectrum of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2004;40(6):897–903.CrossRefPubMed Said A et al. Model for end stage liver disease score predicts mortality across a broad spectrum of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2004;40(6):897–903.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wiesner R et al. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(1):91–6.CrossRefPubMed Wiesner R et al. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(1):91–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kamath PS et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33(2):464–70.CrossRefPubMed Kamath PS et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33(2):464–70.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Freeman Jr RB et al. The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transpl. 2002;8(9):851–8.CrossRefPubMed Freeman Jr RB et al. The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transpl. 2002;8(9):851–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Child CG, Turcotte JG. Surgery and portal hypertension. Major Probl Clin Surg. 1964;1:1–85.PubMed Child CG, Turcotte JG. Surgery and portal hypertension. Major Probl Clin Surg. 1964;1:1–85.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pugh RN et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60(8):646–9.CrossRefPubMed Pugh RN et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60(8):646–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pasqualetti P et al. Prognostic value of Pugh’s modification of Child-Turcotte classification in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Panminerva Med. 1992;34(2):65–8.PubMed Pasqualetti P et al. Prognostic value of Pugh’s modification of Child-Turcotte classification in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Panminerva Med. 1992;34(2):65–8.PubMed
15.
17.
go back to reference Gilchrist ES, Plevris JN. Bone marrow-derived stem cells in liver repair: 10 years down the line. Liver Transpl. 2010;16(2):118–29.CrossRefPubMed Gilchrist ES, Plevris JN. Bone marrow-derived stem cells in liver repair: 10 years down the line. Liver Transpl. 2010;16(2):118–29.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Salama H et al. Autologous CD34+ and CD133+ stem cells transplantation in patients with end stage liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(42):5297–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salama H et al. Autologous CD34+ and CD133+ stem cells transplantation in patients with end stage liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(42):5297–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Pai M et al. Autologous infusion of expanded mobilized adult bone marrow-derived CD34+ cells into patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(8):1952–8.CrossRefPubMed Pai M et al. Autologous infusion of expanded mobilized adult bone marrow-derived CD34+ cells into patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(8):1952–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Nikeghbalian S et al. Autologous transplantation of bone marrow-derived mononuclear and CD133(+) cells in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Arch Iran Med. 2011;14(1):12–7.PubMed Nikeghbalian S et al. Autologous transplantation of bone marrow-derived mononuclear and CD133(+) cells in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Arch Iran Med. 2011;14(1):12–7.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Singh V et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in severe alcoholic hepatitis: a randomized pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(9):1417–23.CrossRefPubMed Singh V et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in severe alcoholic hepatitis: a randomized pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(9):1417–23.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Terai S et al. Improved liver function in patients with liver cirrhosis after autologous bone marrow cell infusion therapy. Stem Cells. 2006;24(10):2292–8.CrossRefPubMed Terai S et al. Improved liver function in patients with liver cirrhosis after autologous bone marrow cell infusion therapy. Stem Cells. 2006;24(10):2292–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Mohamadnejad M et al. Phase 1 human trial of autologous bone marrow-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(24):3359–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mohamadnejad M et al. Phase 1 human trial of autologous bone marrow-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(24):3359–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Gaia S et al. Feasibility and safety of G-CSF administration to induce bone marrow-derived cells mobilization in patients with end stage liver disease. J Hepatol. 2006;45(1):13–9.CrossRefPubMed Gaia S et al. Feasibility and safety of G-CSF administration to induce bone marrow-derived cells mobilization in patients with end stage liver disease. J Hepatol. 2006;45(1):13–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Qi X, Guo X, Su C. Clinical outcomes of the transplantation of stem cells from various human tissue sources in the management of liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;10(2):166–80.CrossRefPubMed Qi X, Guo X, Su C. Clinical outcomes of the transplantation of stem cells from various human tissue sources in the management of liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;10(2):166–80.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wang K, Chen X, Ren J. Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation in patients with liver failure: a meta-analytic review. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24(2):147–59.CrossRefPubMed Wang K, Chen X, Ren J. Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation in patients with liver failure: a meta-analytic review. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24(2):147–59.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Seita J, Weissman IL. Hematopoietic stem cell: self-renewal versus differentiation. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Syst Biol Med. 2010;2(6):640–53. Seita J, Weissman IL. Hematopoietic stem cell: self-renewal versus differentiation. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Syst Biol Med. 2010;2(6):640–53.
29.
go back to reference Drake AC et al. Human CD34+ CD133+ hematopoietic stem cells cultured with growth factors including Angptl5 efficiently engraft adult NOD-SCID Il2rgamma-/- (NSG) mice. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18382.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Drake AC et al. Human CD34+ CD133+ hematopoietic stem cells cultured with growth factors including Angptl5 efficiently engraft adult NOD-SCID Il2rgamma-/- (NSG) mice. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18382.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
31.
go back to reference Zhang M, Huang B. The multi-differentiation potential of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012;3(6):48–8. Zhang M, Huang B. The multi-differentiation potential of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012;3(6):48–8.
34.
go back to reference Malgieri A et al. Bone marrow and umbilical cord blood human mesenchymal stem cells: state of the art. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2010;3(4):248–69.PubMedPubMedCentral Malgieri A et al. Bone marrow and umbilical cord blood human mesenchymal stem cells: state of the art. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2010;3(4):248–69.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference D’Souza A et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration: adverse events. Transfus Med Rev. 2008;22(4):280–90.CrossRefPubMed D’Souza A et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration: adverse events. Transfus Med Rev. 2008;22(4):280–90.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Esrefoglu M. Role of stem cells in repair of liver injury: experimental and clinical benefit of transferred stem cells on liver failure. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(40):6757–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Esrefoglu M. Role of stem cells in repair of liver injury: experimental and clinical benefit of transferred stem cells on liver failure. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(40):6757–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Ma XR et al. Transplantation of autologous mesenchymal stem cells for end-stage liver cirrhosis: a meta-analysis based on seven controlled trials. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:908275.PubMedPubMedCentral Ma XR et al. Transplantation of autologous mesenchymal stem cells for end-stage liver cirrhosis: a meta-analysis based on seven controlled trials. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:908275.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Moore JK, Stutchfield BM, Forbes SJ. Systematic review: the effects of autologous stem cell therapy for patients with liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39(7):673–85.CrossRefPubMed Moore JK, Stutchfield BM, Forbes SJ. Systematic review: the effects of autologous stem cell therapy for patients with liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39(7):673–85.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Pan XN, Zheng LQ, Lai XH. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for decompensated liver cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(38):14051–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pan XN, Zheng LQ, Lai XH. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for decompensated liver cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(38):14051–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Kim G et al. Therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells for patients with chronic liver diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30(10):1405–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim G et al. Therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells for patients with chronic liver diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30(10):1405–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, G.S.e., Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 2011. Higgins JPT, G.S.e., Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 2011.
44.
go back to reference Khan KS, t.R.G., Glanville J, Sowden AJ, Kleijnen J (editors)., ed. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews (CRD report number 4) (2nd edition). York (UK): NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2001. Khan KS, t.R.G., Glanville J, Sowden AJ, Kleijnen J (editors)., ed. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews (CRD report number 4) (2nd edition). York (UK): NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2001.
45.
go back to reference Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med. 1998;17(24):2815–34.CrossRefPubMed Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med. 1998;17(24):2815–34.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons; 2009. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
47.
go back to reference Peters JL et al. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(6):676–80.CrossRefPubMed Peters JL et al. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(6):676–80.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Song F et al. Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ. 2009;338:b1147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Song F et al. Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ. 2009;338:b1147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Jansen JP et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR task force on indirect treatment comparisons good research practices: part 1. Value Health. 2011;14(4):417–28.CrossRefPubMed Jansen JP et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR task force on indirect treatment comparisons good research practices: part 1. Value Health. 2011;14(4):417–28.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Shamseer L et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.CrossRefPubMed Shamseer L et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical effectiveness of cell therapies in patients with chronic liver disease and acute-on-chronic liver failure: a systematic review protocol
Authors
Nwe Ni Than
Claire L. Tomlinson
Debashis Haldar
Andrew L. King
David Moore
Philip N. Newsome
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0277-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Systematic Reviews 1/2016 Go to the issue