Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Protocol

Health service provider education and/or training in infant male circumcision to improve short- and long-term morbidity outcomes: protocol for systematic review

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There has been an expansion of circumcision services in Africa as part of a long-term HIV prevention strategy. However, the effect of infant male circumcision on morbidity and mortality still remains unclear. Acute morbidities associated with circumcision include pain, bleeding, swelling, infection, tetanus or inadequate skin removal. Scale-up of circumcision services could lead to a rise in these associated morbidities that could have significant impact on health service delivery and the safety of infants.
Multidisciplinary training programmes have been developed to improve skills of health service providers, but very little is known about the effectiveness of health service provider education and/or training for infant male circumcision on short- and long-term morbidity outcomes. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of health service provider education and/or training for infant male circumcision on short- and long-term morbidity outcomes.

Methods/design

The review will include studies comparing health service providers who have received education and/or training to improve their skills for infant male circumcision with those who have not received education and/or training. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs will be included. The outcomes of interest are short-term morbidities of the male infant including pain, infection, tetanus, bleeding, excess skin removal, glans amputation and fistula. Long-term morbidities include urinary tract infection (UTI), HIV infection and abnormalities of urination. Databases such as MEDLINE (OVID), PsycINFO (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL, Cochrane Library (including CENTRAL and DARE), WHO databases and reference list of papers will be searched for relevant articles. Study selection, data extraction and synthesis and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool will be conducted. We will calculate the pooled estimates of the difference in means and risk ratios using random effects models. If insufficient data are available, we will present results descriptively.

Discussion

This review appears to be the first to be conducted in this area. The findings will have important implications for infant male circumcision programmes and policy.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42015029345
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gray RH et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. The Lancet. 2007;369(9562):657–66.CrossRef Gray RH et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. The Lancet. 2007;369(9562):657–66.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Auvert B et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS medicine. 2005;2(11):1112.CrossRef Auvert B et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS medicine. 2005;2(11):1112.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hargrove J et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in high HIV prevalence settings: what can mathematical modelling contribute to informed decision making? PLoS Med. 2009;6(9):e1000109.CrossRef Hargrove J et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in high HIV prevalence settings: what can mathematical modelling contribute to informed decision making? PLoS Med. 2009;6(9):e1000109.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bailey RC et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. The lancet. 2007;369(9562):643–56.CrossRef Bailey RC et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. The lancet. 2007;369(9562):643–56.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wilcken A, Keil T, Dick B. Traditional male circumcision in eastern and southern Africa: a systematic review of prevalence and complications. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2010;88(12):907–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilcken A, Keil T, Dick B. Traditional male circumcision in eastern and southern Africa: a systematic review of prevalence and complications. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2010;88(12):907–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference DeMaria J et al. Are physicians performing neonatal circumcisions well-trained? Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2013;7(7–8):260.PubMedPubMedCentral DeMaria J et al. Are physicians performing neonatal circumcisions well-trained? Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2013;7(7–8):260.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Perera CL et al. Safety and efficacy of nontherapeutic male circumcision: a systematic review. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2010;8(1):64–72.CrossRefPubMed Perera CL et al. Safety and efficacy of nontherapeutic male circumcision: a systematic review. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2010;8(1):64–72.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference WHO. Report on neonatal, infant and pre-pubertal male circumcision practices in traditional and clinical settings in Ghana. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008. WHO. Report on neonatal, infant and pre-pubertal male circumcision practices in traditional and clinical settings in Ghana. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008.
11.
go back to reference Shamseer L et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.CrossRefPubMed Shamseer L et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Guyatt G et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2011;64(4):383–94.CrossRefPubMed Guyatt G et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2011;64(4):383–94.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference O'Neill J, Tabish H, Welch V, Petticrew M, Pottie K, Clarke M, Evans T, Pardo Pardo J, Waters E, White H et al. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2014;67(1):56–64. O'Neill J, Tabish H, Welch V, Petticrew M, Pottie K, Clarke M, Evans T, Pardo Pardo J, Waters E, White H et al. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2014;67(1):56–64.
Metadata
Title
Health service provider education and/or training in infant male circumcision to improve short- and long-term morbidity outcomes: protocol for systematic review
Publication date
01-12-2016
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0216-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Systematic Reviews 1/2016 Go to the issue