Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original research article

Between individualism and social solidarity in vaccination policy: the case of the 2013 OPV campaign in Israel

Authors: Hagai Boas, Anat Rosenthal, Nadav Davidovitch

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

During the summer of 2013, after samples of poliomyelitis virus were found in sewage, Israel launched an intensive national oral polio vaccine (OPV) campaign. The clinical objective of the campaign was rather clear. With not a single case of infantile paralysis and with a population already highly protected with IPV (a dead version of the vaccine), the goal was to foster collective immunity so that risk populations could also be protected. This, however, entailed a rather unusual issue: how to persuade parents whose children already received an IPV to re-vaccinate their children, now with a live yet attenuated version of the virus that was excluded from the national vaccination program in 2004. The challenge therefore was a call for social solidarity - asking parents to vaccinate their children mainly for the sake of protecting unknown at risk populations and to take part in the larger global goals of the polio eradication program. This challenge stands at the core of our investigation. We see the OPV campaign of summer 2013 as a good case study of the tension between individualism and social solidarity in seeking the cooperation of the public.

Methods

We draw on a qualitative study that included participant observation, document reviews and interviews with policy-makers, parents, journalists, public health experts and community leaders. These data were analyzed in order to unravel the ways in which self-interest, community and solidarity were conceived by different agents during the vaccination campaign.

Results

The family as a metaphor for social solidarity was the main discursive item in the public campaign. Tensions, dissonances and inconsistencies were found between different registers and agencies as to what is at stake and what is required.

Conclusions

We discuss the ethical and social implications of our findings in order to better understand how persuasion was used in the current case and for its future role in similar events, within and outside Israel, when global efforts to eradicate polio are ongoing.
Footnotes
2
Bioethics is often identified with the four principles known as Georgetown Principlism (autonomy, justice, benevolence, and non-maleficence) which are associated with clinical bioethics or medical ethics that focus on the patient’s best interest. Social solidarity, however, pertains to a different register of bioethical conceptualization. Under this perspective, the focus of analysis is the interplay between the individual and the community.
 
4
See Tasher et al. [25] for an analysis of the medical benefits of the campaign.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Carmeli YS, editors. Kin, gene, community: reproductive technologies among Jewish Israelis, vol. 19. Berghahn Books; 2010. Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Carmeli YS, editors. Kin, gene, community: reproductive technologies among Jewish Israelis, vol. 19. Berghahn Books; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Colgrove J. Vaccine Refusal Revisited – The Limits of Public Health Persuation and Coercion. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375(14):1316–7. Colgrove J. Vaccine Refusal Revisited – The Limits of Public Health Persuation and Coercion. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375(14):1316–7.
3.
go back to reference Colgrove J. State of Immunity: the politics of vaccination in twentieth-century America. California: University of California Press; 2006. Colgrove J. State of Immunity: the politics of vaccination in twentieth-century America. California: University of California Press; 2006.
4.
go back to reference Closser S, Rosenthal A, Maes K, Justice J, Cox K, Omidian PA, Mohammed IZ, Dukku AM, Koon AD, Nyirazinyoye L. The Global Context of Vaccine Refusal: Insights from a Systematic Comparative Ethnography of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Med Anthropol Q. 2015. doi:10.1111/maq.12229.PubMed Closser S, Rosenthal A, Maes K, Justice J, Cox K, Omidian PA, Mohammed IZ, Dukku AM, Koon AD, Nyirazinyoye L. The Global Context of Vaccine Refusal: Insights from a Systematic Comparative Ethnography of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Med Anthropol Q. 2015. doi:10.​1111/​maq.​12229.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Conis E. Vaccine Nation: America’s Changing Relationship with Immunization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2015. Conis E. Vaccine Nation: America’s Changing Relationship with Immunization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2015.
6.
go back to reference Daniels N. Equity and Population Health: Towards a Broader Bioethics Agenda. Hastings Cent Rep. 2006;36:22–35.CrossRefPubMed Daniels N. Equity and Population Health: Towards a Broader Bioethics Agenda. Hastings Cent Rep. 2006;36:22–35.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Davidovitch N. Immigration and Body Politic: Vaccination Policy and Practices during Mass Immigration to Israel (1948–1956). In: Cox C, Marland H, editors. Migration. 2013. Davidovitch N. Immigration and Body Politic: Vaccination Policy and Practices during Mass Immigration to Israel (1948–1956). In: Cox C, Marland H, editors. Migration. 2013.
8.
go back to reference Farmer P, Gastineau CN. New Malaise: Bioethics and Human Rights in the Global Era. J Law Med Ethics. 2004;32:243–51.CrossRefPubMed Farmer P, Gastineau CN. New Malaise: Bioethics and Human Rights in the Global Era. J Law Med Ethics. 2004;32:243–51.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Filc D. Circles of Exclusion. Cornell University Press; 2009 Filc D. Circles of Exclusion. Cornell University Press; 2009
10.
go back to reference Filc D. Davidovitch N, Rethinking the Private-Public Mix in Healthcare: Analysis of Health Reforms in Israel during the Last Three Decades, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, in Press Filc D. Davidovitch N, Rethinking the Private-Public Mix in Healthcare: Analysis of Health Reforms in Israel during the Last Three Decades, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, in Press
11.
go back to reference Dawson A, Jennings B. The Place of Social Solidarity in Public Health Ethics. Public Health Rev. 2013;34(1):65–79. Dawson A, Jennings B. The Place of Social Solidarity in Public Health Ethics. Public Health Rev. 2013;34(1):65–79.
12.
go back to reference Fogiel-Bijaoui S. Familism, postmodernity and the state: The case of Israel. J Israeli History. 2002;21:38–62.CrossRef Fogiel-Bijaoui S. Familism, postmodernity and the state: The case of Israel. J Israeli History. 2002;21:38–62.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hashiloni-Dolev Y. The Reproductive Revolution. Tel Aviv: Modan; 2013. Hashiloni-Dolev Y. The Reproductive Revolution. Tel Aviv: Modan; 2013.
16.
go back to reference Herzog H. Gendering Politics: Women in Israel. University of Michigan Press. 1999 Herzog H. Gendering Politics: Women in Israel. University of Michigan Press. 1999
18.
go back to reference Kaliner E, Moran-Gilad J, Grotto I, Somekh E, Kopel E, Gdalevich M, et al. Silent reintroduction of wild-type poliovirus to Israel, 2013–risk communication challenges in an argumentative atmosphere. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(7):207030.CrossRef Kaliner E, Moran-Gilad J, Grotto I, Somekh E, Kopel E, Gdalevich M, et al. Silent reintroduction of wild-type poliovirus to Israel, 2013–risk communication challenges in an argumentative atmosphere. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(7):207030.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Levy, Y. Israel’s Materialist Militarism. Madison, MD: Rowman & Littlefield/ Lexington Books, Series: Innovations in the Study of World Politics. 2007. Levy, Y. Israel’s Materialist Militarism. Madison, MD: Rowman & Littlefield/ Lexington Books, Series: Innovations in the Study of World Politics. 2007.
20.
go back to reference Manor Y, Shulman LM, Kaliner E, Hindiyeh M, Ram D, Sofer D, et al. Intensified environmental surveillance supporting the response to wild poliovirus type 1 silent circulation in Israel 2013. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(7):20708.CrossRefPubMed Manor Y, Shulman LM, Kaliner E, Hindiyeh M, Ram D, Sofer D, et al. Intensified environmental surveillance supporting the response to wild poliovirus type 1 silent circulation in Israel 2013. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(7):20708.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Prainsack B, Buyx A. Solidarity: Reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2011. Prainsack B, Buyx A. Solidarity: Reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2011.
22.
go back to reference Ram U. Glocommodification: How the global consumes the local-McDonald’s in Israel. Current Sociology. 2004;52(1):11–31.CrossRef Ram U. Glocommodification: How the global consumes the local-McDonald’s in Israel. Current Sociology. 2004;52(1):11–31.CrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Sage WM. Solidarity: Unfashionable, but still American. Connecting American Values with Health Reform. Garrison: The Hastings Center; 2009. Sage WM. Solidarity: Unfashionable, but still American. Connecting American Values with Health Reform. Garrison: The Hastings Center; 2009.
25.
go back to reference Tasher D, Rahav G, Levine H, et al. How many OPV rounds are required to stop wild polio virus in a developed country? Lessons from the Israeli case. Vaccine. 2016;34:299–301.CrossRefPubMed Tasher D, Rahav G, Levine H, et al. How many OPV rounds are required to stop wild polio virus in a developed country? Lessons from the Israeli case. Vaccine. 2016;34:299–301.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Trostle JA. Epidemiology and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.CrossRef Trostle JA. Epidemiology and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Between individualism and social solidarity in vaccination policy: the case of the 2013 OPV campaign in Israel
Authors
Hagai Boas
Anat Rosenthal
Nadav Davidovitch
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0119-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2016 Go to the issue