Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Economics Review 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis

Author: Kyung-Bok Son

Published in: Health Economics Review | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Regulatory approval and reimbursement decisions are necessary if new drugs are to become accessible in a timely manner. However, the process of regulatory approval and the establishment of reimbursement decisions varies across countries. This study aims to analyze the duration between regulatory approval and reimbursement decision for new drugs and to evaluate various factors affecting the timely availability of new medicines in the Korean market. The duration was subdivided into regulatory approval–reimbursement application and reimbursement application–reimbursement decision. We used pharmaceutical approval data to identify new medicines, retrieved documents from the pharmaceutical benefits committee to collect information on reimbursement decision, and applied a non-parametric event history model.

Results

A total of 128 new medicines applied for reimbursement decision, including 85 drugs between 2007 and 2013 and 43 drugs between 2014 and 2016. Delays in access to new medicines occurred at various levels, and various factors affected in different durations. In proportional hazard model, the second period shortened all durations in the models. Biologics and clinically improved drugs were the factor that delayed the duration of regulatory approval–reimbursement application, while uncertain drugs in clinical effectiveness and ATC J or L delayed the duration of reimbursement application–reimbursement decision.

Conclusions

The duration between regulatory approval and reimbursement decision has decreased, and the main cause of the delay has changed. For instance, the proportion of reimbursement trial–reimbursement decision in the total duration was 62.9% (18.39 months out of 29.24 months) in the first period, while the proportion of regulatory approval–reimbursement trial in the total duration was 64.2% (8.6 months out of 13.40 months) in the second period. A series of policies to reinforce access to medicines after 2014 has been effective for the timely availability of new medicines, including both prompt reimbursement application decided by manufacturers and timely review process by the authorities.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Improving access to medicines in the South-East Asia region: progress, challenges, priorities. World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2017. World Health Organization. Improving access to medicines in the South-East Asia region: progress, challenges, priorities. World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2017.
2.
go back to reference Tsoi B, O’Reilly D, Masucci L, Drummond M, Goeree R. Harmonization of HTA-based reimbursement and regulatory approval activities: a qualitative study. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2015;22(1):e78–89.PubMed Tsoi B, O’Reilly D, Masucci L, Drummond M, Goeree R. Harmonization of HTA-based reimbursement and regulatory approval activities: a qualitative study. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2015;22(1):e78–89.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Ades F, Senterre C, Zardavas D, de Azambuja E, Popescu R, Parent F, et al. An exploratory analysis of the factors leading to delays in cancer drug reimbursement in the European Union: the trastuzumab case. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(18):3089–97.CrossRefPubMed Ades F, Senterre C, Zardavas D, de Azambuja E, Popescu R, Parent F, et al. An exploratory analysis of the factors leading to delays in cancer drug reimbursement in the European Union: the trastuzumab case. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(18):3089–97.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Puig-Junoy J. Impact of European pharmaceutical price regulation on generic price competition. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(8):649–63.CrossRefPubMed Puig-Junoy J. Impact of European pharmaceutical price regulation on generic price competition. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(8):649–63.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Garattini L, Cornago D, De Compadri P. Pricing and reimbursement of in-patent drugs in seven European countries: a comparative analysis. Health Policy. 2007;82(3):330–9.CrossRefPubMed Garattini L, Cornago D, De Compadri P. Pricing and reimbursement of in-patent drugs in seven European countries: a comparative analysis. Health Policy. 2007;82(3):330–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Stevens A, Milne R. Health technology assessment in England and Wales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(1):11–24.CrossRefPubMed Stevens A, Milne R. Health technology assessment in England and Wales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(1):11–24.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Garrido M, Kristensen F, Nielsen C, Busse R. Health technology assessment and health policy-making in Europe: current status, challenges and potential. WHO Regional Office Europe; 2008. Garrido M, Kristensen F, Nielsen C, Busse R. Health technology assessment and health policy-making in Europe: current status, challenges and potential. WHO Regional Office Europe; 2008.
10.
go back to reference Bae E-Y, Hong J-M, Kwon H-Y, Jang S, Lee H-J, Bae S, et al. Eight-year experience of using HTA in drug reimbursement: South Korea. Health Policy. 2016;120(6):612–20.CrossRefPubMed Bae E-Y, Hong J-M, Kwon H-Y, Jang S, Lee H-J, Bae S, et al. Eight-year experience of using HTA in drug reimbursement: South Korea. Health Policy. 2016;120(6):612–20.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Yang B-M, Bae E-Y, Kim J. Economic evaluation and pharmaceutical reimbursement reform in South Korea’s National Health Insurance. Health Aff. 2008;27(1):179–87.CrossRefPubMed Yang B-M, Bae E-Y, Kim J. Economic evaluation and pharmaceutical reimbursement reform in South Korea’s National Health Insurance. Health Aff. 2008;27(1):179–87.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bae S, Lee S, Bae E-Y, Jang S. Korean guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluation (second and updated version). Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(4):257–67.CrossRefPubMed Bae S, Lee S, Bae E-Y, Jang S. Korean guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluation (second and updated version). Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(4):257–67.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ngorsuraches S, Meng W, Kim B-Y, Kulsomboon V. Drug reimbursement decision-making in Thailand, China, and South Korea. Value Health. 2012;15(1):S120–S5.CrossRefPubMed Ngorsuraches S, Meng W, Kim B-Y, Kulsomboon V. Drug reimbursement decision-making in Thailand, China, and South Korea. Value Health. 2012;15(1):S120–S5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Yang B-M. The future of health technology assessment in healthcare decision making in Asia. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):891–901.CrossRefPubMed Yang B-M. The future of health technology assessment in healthcare decision making in Asia. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):891–901.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Danzon PM, Wang YR, Wang L. The impact of price regulation on the launch delay of new drugs—evidence from twenty-five major markets in the 1990s. Health Econ. 2005;14(3):269–92.CrossRefPubMed Danzon PM, Wang YR, Wang L. The impact of price regulation on the launch delay of new drugs—evidence from twenty-five major markets in the 1990s. Health Econ. 2005;14(3):269–92.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kim H-J, Park H-J, Ko S-K. Health technology assessment and decision making: art of scientific interpretation. J Health Tech Assess. 2013;1:86–92. Kim H-J, Park H-J, Ko S-K. Health technology assessment and decision making: art of scientific interpretation. J Health Tech Assess. 2013;1:86–92.
17.
go back to reference Bae E-Y. Positive list system in Korea: issues and challenges. J Health Tech Assess. 2013;1:43–50. Bae E-Y. Positive list system in Korea: issues and challenges. J Health Tech Assess. 2013;1:43–50.
18.
go back to reference Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Pharmaceutical positive list system in Korea. 2016. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Pharmaceutical positive list system in Korea. 2016.
19.
go back to reference Kim E, Kim Y. Review of programs for improving patient’s access to medicines. Korean J Clin Pharm. 2018;28(1):40–50.CrossRef Kim E, Kim Y. Review of programs for improving patient’s access to medicines. Korean J Clin Pharm. 2018;28(1):40–50.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Son KB, Lee TJ. Compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals reconsidered: current situation and implications for access to medicines. Global Public Health. 2018;13(10):1430-40.CrossRefPubMed Son KB, Lee TJ. Compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals reconsidered: current situation and implications for access to medicines. Global Public Health. 2018;13(10):1430-40.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Adamski J, Godman B, Ofierska-Sujkowska G, Osińska B, Herholz H, Wendykowska K, et al. Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adamski J, Godman B, Ofierska-Sujkowska G, Osińska B, Herholz H, Wendykowska K, et al. Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Wonder M, Backhouse ME, Sullivan SD. Australian managed entry scheme: a new manageable process for the reimbursement of new medicines? Value Health. 2012;15(3):586–90.CrossRefPubMed Wonder M, Backhouse ME, Sullivan SD. Australian managed entry scheme: a new manageable process for the reimbursement of new medicines? Value Health. 2012;15(3):586–90.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Morel T, Arickx F, Befrits G, Siviero P, van der Meijden C, Xoxi E, et al. Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8(1):198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morel T, Arickx F, Befrits G, Siviero P, van der Meijden C, Xoxi E, et al. Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8(1):198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Son KB, Lee TJ. Review of pharmaceutical economic evaluation studies in Korea. J Health Tech Assess. 2014;2:83–92. Son KB, Lee TJ. Review of pharmaceutical economic evaluation studies in Korea. J Health Tech Assess. 2014;2:83–92.
26.
go back to reference Nation Health Insurance Services. Pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies in South Korea. Gangwon: National Health Insurance Services; 2017. Nation Health Insurance Services. Pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies in South Korea. Gangwon: National Health Insurance Services; 2017.
28.
go back to reference Aaltonen K, Ragupathy R, Tordoff J, Reith D, Norris P. The impact of pharmaceutical cost containment policies on the range of medicines available and subsidized in Finland and New Zealand. Value Health. 2010;13(1):148–56.CrossRefPubMed Aaltonen K, Ragupathy R, Tordoff J, Reith D, Norris P. The impact of pharmaceutical cost containment policies on the range of medicines available and subsidized in Finland and New Zealand. Value Health. 2010;13(1):148–56.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Welfare. “2012 Pharmaceutical industry competitiveness enhancement plan” announced in preparation for effectivation of KOR-US FTA, drug price reduction, etc. 2012. Ministry of Health and Welfare. “2012 Pharmaceutical industry competitiveness enhancement plan” announced in preparation for effectivation of KOR-US FTA, drug price reduction, etc. 2012.
30.
go back to reference Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2005. Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2005.
Metadata
Title
Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis
Author
Kyung-Bok Son
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Health Economics Review / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2191-1991
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0216-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health Economics Review 1/2018 Go to the issue