Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Economics Review 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Cost of a lymphedema treatment mandate-10 years of experience in the Commonwealth of Virginia

Author: Robert Weiss

Published in: Health Economics Review | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Treatment of chronic illness accounts for over 90 % of Medicare spending. Chronic lymphedema places over 3 million Americans at risk of recurrent cellulitis. Health insurers and legislators have taken an active role in fighting attempts to mandate the treatment of lymphedema for fear that provision of the physical therapy and compression materials would result in large and uncontrollable claim costs. The author knows of no open source of lymphedema treatment cost data based on population coverage or claims. Published studies compare cost of treatment versus cost of non-treatment for a select group of lymphedema patients. They do not provide the data necessary for insurance underwriters’ estimations of expected claim costs for a larger general population with a range of severities, or for legislators’ evaluations of the costs of proposed mandates to cover treatment of lymphedema according to current medical standards. These data are of interest to providers, advocates and legislators in Canada, Australia and England as well as the U.S.
The Commonwealth of Virginia has had a lymphedema treatment mandate since 2004. Reported data for 2004–2013, representing 80 % of the Virginia healthcare insurance market, contains claims and utilization data and claims-based estimates of the premium impact of its lymphedema mandate. The average actual annual lymphedema claim cost was $1.59 per individual contract and $3.24 per group contract for the years reported, representing 0.053 and 0.089 % of average total claims. The estimated premium impact ranged 0.00–0.64 % of total average premium for all mandated coverage contracts. In this study actual costs are compared with pre-mandate state mandate commission estimates for proposed lymphedema mandates from Virginia, Massachusetts and California.
Ten years of insurance experience with a lymphedema treatment mandate in Virginia shows that costs of lymphedema treatment are an insignificant part of insured healthcare costs, and that treatment of lymphedema may reduce costs of office visits and hospitalizations due to lymphedema and lymphedema-related cellulitis. Estimates based on more limited data overestimate these costs. Lymphedema treatment is a potent tool for reduction in healthcare costs while improving the quality of care for cancer survivors and others suffering with this chronic progressive condition.
Footnotes
1
United States Senate Committee on Finance, Chronic Care Workgroup letter to stakeholders, dated May 22, 2015; Available from http://​www.​finance.​senate.​gov/​newsroom/​chairman/​release/​?​id=​9f9f2d3e-401e-409b-a53a-22bbe3f56f2c. Accessed on September 30, 2015.
 
2
Virginia House Bill No. 1737, “A bill … relating to health insurance coverage for lymphedema” by Delegate Leo C. Wardrup, Jr. Offered January 8, 2003. Available from http://​lis.​virginia.​gov/​cgi-bin/​legp604.​exe?​031+ful+HB1737ER​. Accessed on September 30, 2015.
 
3
Code of Virginia § 38.2-3419.1. Report of costs and utilization of mandated benefits. Available from http://​leg1.​state.​va.​us/​cgi-bin/​legp504.​exe?​000+cod+38.​2-3419.​1. Accessed on September 30, 2015.
 
4
Virginia, State Corporation Commission Series. Report of the State Corporation Commission to the Governor and the General Assembly of Virginia: The Financial Impact of Mandated Health Insurance Benefits and Providers Pursuant to Section 38.2-3419.1 of the Code of Virginia: [year] Reporting Period. Reports are listed for the reporting years covered in Table 1, and are available at the Virginia Department of Insurance website at URL: http://​leg2.​state.​va.​us/​DLS/​h&​sdocs.​nsf/​Search+All/​?​SearchView&​SearchOrder=​4&​query=​38.​2-3419.​1. Accessed October 4, 2016.
 
5
California Health Benefits Review Program. Analysis of Assembly Bill 213 Health Care Coverage for Lymphedema - A Report to the 2005-2006 California Legislature. April 7, 2005. Available at http://​chbrp.​org/​documents/​ab_​213final.​pdf. Accessed on September 30, 2015.
 
6
Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy. Review and Evaluation of Proposed Legislation Entitled: An Act Relative to Women’s Health and Cancer Recovery, Senate Bill 896 - Provided for The Joint Committee on Public Health. December 2010. Appendix: Compass Health Analytics, Inc. Actuarial Assessment of Senate Bill 896: An Act Relative to Women’s Health and Cancer Recovery – Prepared for Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy, June 18, 2010. Available at http://​archives.​lib.​state.​ma.​us/​bitstream/​handle/​2452/​101824/​ocn711076017.​pdf?​sequence=​1&​isAllowed=​y. Accessed on September 30, 2015.
 
7
Virginia Special Advisory Commission on Mandated Health Insurance Benefits. Report of the Special Advisory Commission on Mandated Health Insurance Benefits, House Bill 383, Mandated Coverage of Lymphedema, Commonwealth of Virginia, Richmond, 2003. Available at
http://​leg2.​state.​va.​us/​DLS/​H&​SDocs.​NSF/​Published%20​by%20​Year? Accessed on September 30, 2015 2003-RD15 Mandated Coverage of Lymphedema.
 
8
Individual health plans are contracts between an individual and the insurance provider (insurance company or HMO), and can cover an individual or the individual and spouse and dependents. Group health plans are offered by employers as part of an employee benefits package. Both individual and group plans are considered Private health insurance for Census Department Purposes. State health plans are offered to Commonwealth of Virginia (COVA) employees, their families, and retirees, as well as Medicaid participants, and include group plans and HMO plans from a provider selected by the State. In all these cases the plans must provide lymphedema treatment coverage per State Law. Not included in these statistics are Medicare plans, which are not subject to Virginia State law.
 
9
North Carolina Fiscal Research Division. General Assembly of North Carolina, Session 2009, Legislative Actuarial Note, Health Benefits, Bill Number: House Bill 535. April 17, 2009 http://​www.​ncleg.​net/​Sessions/​2009/​FiscalNotes/​House/​PDF/​HAH0535v1n1.​pdf. Accessed on September 30, 2015.
 
10
Virginia. CPT and ICD-9-CM Codes to be used in filling out Form MD-2 for reporting costs of mandated benefits (2011). http://​www.​scc.​virginia.​gov/​boi/​co/​health/​ltcmed/​cpt_​codes.​pdf. Accessed on September 30, 2015.
 
11
Virginia Administrative Code 14VAC5-190-80:1 APPENDIX A. FORM MB-1 INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION. http://​leg1.​state.​va.​us/​cgi-bin/​legp504.​exe?​000+reg+14VAC5-190-80Z1. Accessed on September 30, 2015.
 
12
Haislmaier EF. Health Care Consolidation and Competition after PPACA – Testimony before Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet, United States House of Representatives, May 18, 2012. Available at http://​www.​heritage.​org/​research/​testimony/​2013/​06/​health-care-consolidation-and-competition-after-ppaca. Accessed on October 4, 2016.
 
13
U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, Mitigating the Loss of Private Insurance With Public Coverage for the Under-65 Population: 2008 to 2012, Jonathan Rodean, September 2013. http://​www.​census.​gov/​content/​dam/​Census/​library/​publications/​2013/​acs/​acsbr12-11.​pdf. Accessed on August 5, 2016.
 
14
American Academy of Actuaries. Critical Issues in Health Reform: Premium Setting in the Individual Market, March 2010. Available at http://​actuary.​org/​files/​publications/​premiums_​settings_​mar2010.​pdf. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Földi E. Prevention of dermatolymphangioadenitis by combined physiotherapy of the swollen arm after treatment for breast cancer. Lymphology. 1996;29:48–9.PubMed Földi E. Prevention of dermatolymphangioadenitis by combined physiotherapy of the swollen arm after treatment for breast cancer. Lymphology. 1996;29:48–9.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Stout NL, Weiss R, Feldman JL, Stewart BR, Armer JM, Cormier JN, Shih Y-CT. A systematic review of care delivery models and economic analyses in lymphedema: Health policy impact (2004–2011). Lymphology. 2013;46:21–41. Stout NL, Weiss R, Feldman JL, Stewart BR, Armer JM, Cormier JN, Shih Y-CT. A systematic review of care delivery models and economic analyses in lymphedema: Health policy impact (2004–2011). Lymphology. 2013;46:21–41.
5.
go back to reference Ko DSC, Lerner R, Klose G, Cosimi AB. Effective treatment of lymphedema of the extremities. Arch Surg. 1998;133(4):452–8.CrossRefPubMed Ko DSC, Lerner R, Klose G, Cosimi AB. Effective treatment of lymphedema of the extremities. Arch Surg. 1998;133(4):452–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Weiss R. Three Methods for the Cost-Efficacy Analysis of Lymphedema Treatment. Presented at American Society of Lymphology 2007 Annual Conference, Kansas City, MO, Nov 26–8, 2007 Weiss R. Three Methods for the Cost-Efficacy Analysis of Lymphedema Treatment. Presented at American Society of Lymphology 2007 Annual Conference, Kansas City, MO, Nov 26–8, 2007
Metadata
Title
Cost of a lymphedema treatment mandate-10 years of experience in the Commonwealth of Virginia
Author
Robert Weiss
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Health Economics Review / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2191-1991
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-016-0117-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Health Economics Review 1/2016 Go to the issue