Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Case Reports 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Case report

Prosthetic heart valve selection in women of childbearing age with acquired heart disease: a case report

Authors: Leonid Barbarash, Natalya Rutkovskaya, Olga Barbarash, Yuri Odarenko, Alexander Stasev, Evgenya Uchasova

Published in: Journal of Medical Case Reports | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The problem of prosthetic heart valve selection in fertile women with acquired heart defects remains crucial in modern cardiology. Mechanical heart valves require lifelong indirect anticoagulant therapy, which has significant fetal toxicity and is unacceptable for women planning pregnancy. Bioprosthetic heart valves are the best choice for fertile women; however, their durability is limited, and reoperations are required.

Case presentation

We describe the clinical case of a 21-year-old Russian woman with infectious endocarditis who underwent heart valve replacement with an epoxy-treated mitral valve prosthesis.

Conclusions

Epoxy-treated bioprosthetic heart valves can be used without long-term anticoagulant therapy because of their optimal hemodynamic functional parameters. Moreover, their high thromboresistance and resistance to infection improve patients’ quality of life in their late postoperative period. We recommend these valves both in older persons and in young patients including women who are planning pregnancy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bokeria LA, Gudkova RG. Cardiovascular surgery. Diseases and congenital malformations of the circulatory system. Moscow: Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery Bakuleva RAMS; 2013. p. 57. Bokeria LA, Gudkova RG. Cardiovascular surgery. Diseases and congenital malformations of the circulatory system. Moscow: Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery Bakuleva RAMS; 2013. p. 57.
2.
go back to reference Tillquist MN, Maddox TM. Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:91–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tillquist MN, Maddox TM. Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:91–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Butchart EG. Antithrombotic management in patients with prosthetic valves: a comparison of American and European guidelines. Heart. 2009;95(5):430–6.CrossRefPubMed Butchart EG. Antithrombotic management in patients with prosthetic valves: a comparison of American and European guidelines. Heart. 2009;95(5):430–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Borger MA, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Christie-Hrybinsky D, Feindel CM, David TE. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15(1):49–56.PubMed Borger MA, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Christie-Hrybinsky D, Feindel CM, David TE. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15(1):49–56.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, Germann E, Macnab JS, Stanford E, et al. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance over 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(4):994–1000.CrossRefPubMed Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, Germann E, Macnab JS, Stanford E, et al. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance over 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(4):994–1000.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hall JG. Embryopathy associated with oral anticoagulant therapy. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1976;12(5):33–7.PubMed Hall JG. Embryopathy associated with oral anticoagulant therapy. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1976;12(5):33–7.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hou J-W. Fetal warfarin syndrome. Chang Gung Med J. 2004;27(9):691–5.PubMed Hou J-W. Fetal warfarin syndrome. Chang Gung Med J. 2004;27(9):691–5.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Sillesen M, Hjortdal V, Vejlstrup N, Sørensen K. Pregnancy with prosthetic heart valves – 30 years’ nationwide experience in Denmark. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(2):448–54.PubMed Sillesen M, Hjortdal V, Vejlstrup N, Sørensen K. Pregnancy with prosthetic heart valves – 30 years’ nationwide experience in Denmark. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(2):448–54.PubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Elkayam U, Singh H, Irani A, Akhter MW. Anticoagulation in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Therapeut. 2004;9(2):107–15.CrossRef Elkayam U, Singh H, Irani A, Akhter MW. Anticoagulation in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Therapeut. 2004;9(2):107–15.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hanania G, Thomas D, Michel PL, Garbarz E, Age C, Millaire A, et al. Pregnancy and prosthetic heart valves: A French cooperative retrospective study of 155 cases. Eur Heart J. 1994;15(12):1651–8.PubMed Hanania G, Thomas D, Michel PL, Garbarz E, Age C, Millaire A, et al. Pregnancy and prosthetic heart valves: A French cooperative retrospective study of 155 cases. Eur Heart J. 1994;15(12):1651–8.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthetic heart valves: Selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation. 2009;119(7):1034–48.CrossRefPubMed Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthetic heart valves: Selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation. 2009;119(7):1034–48.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Thiene G, Valente M. Anticalcification strategies to increase bioprosthetic valve durability. J Heart Valve Dis. 2011;20(1):37–44.PubMed Thiene G, Valente M. Anticalcification strategies to increase bioprosthetic valve durability. J Heart Valve Dis. 2011;20(1):37–44.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Prosthetic heart valve selection in women of childbearing age with acquired heart disease: a case report
Authors
Leonid Barbarash
Natalya Rutkovskaya
Olga Barbarash
Yuri Odarenko
Alexander Stasev
Evgenya Uchasova
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1752-1947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0821-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Medical Case Reports 1/2016 Go to the issue