Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Artificial Intelligence | Statement

Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement

Authors: J. Raymond Geis, Adrian Brady, Carol C. Wu, Jack Spencer, Erik Ranschaert, Jacob L. Jaremko, Steve G. Langer, Andrea Borondy Kitts, Judy Birch, William F. Shields, Robert van den Hoven van Genderen, Elmar Kotter, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Tessa S. Cook, Matthew B. Morgan, An Tang, Nabile M. Safdar, Marc Kohli

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association of Radiologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
AI has great potential to increase efficiency and accuracy throughout radiology, but also carries inherent pitfalls and biases. Widespread use of AI-based intelligent and autonomous systems in radiology can increase the risk of systemic errors with high consequence, and highlights complex ethical and societal issues. Currently, there is little experience using AI for patient care in diverse clinical settings. Extensive research is needed to understand how to best deploy AI in clinical practice.
This statement highlights our consensus that ethical use of AI in radiology should promote well-being, minimize harm, and ensure that the benefits and harms are distributed among stakeholders in a just manner. We believe AI should respect human rights and freedoms, including dignity and privacy. It should be designed for maximum transparency and dependability. Ultimate responsibility and accountability for AI remains with its human designers and operators for the foreseeable future.
The radiology community should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI which promote any use that helps patients and the common good and should block use of radiology data and algorithms for financial gain without those two attributes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference O’Neil C (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, 1st edn. Crown, New York O’Neil C (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, 1st edn. Crown, New York
6.
go back to reference Gilpin LH, Bau D, Yuan BZ, Bajwa A, Specter M, Kagal L (2018) Explaining explanations: an overview of interpretability of machine learning. ArXiv180600069 Cs Stat Gilpin LH, Bau D, Yuan BZ, Bajwa A, Specter M, Kagal L (2018) Explaining explanations: an overview of interpretability of machine learning. ArXiv180600069 Cs Stat
13.
go back to reference Chuquicusma MJM, Hussein S, Burt J, Bagci U (2017) How to fool radiologists with generative adverssarial networks? A visual Turing test for lung cancer diagnosis. ArXiv171009762 Cs Q-Bio Chuquicusma MJM, Hussein S, Burt J, Bagci U (2017) How to fool radiologists with generative adverssarial networks? A visual Turing test for lung cancer diagnosis. ArXiv171009762 Cs Q-Bio
14.
go back to reference Finlayson SG, Chung HW, Kohane IS, Beam AL (2018) Adversarial attacks against medical deep learning systems. ArXiv180405296 Cs Stat Finlayson SG, Chung HW, Kohane IS, Beam AL (2018) Adversarial attacks against medical deep learning systems. ArXiv180405296 Cs Stat
17.
go back to reference Kingston J (2018) Artificial intelligence and legal liability. ArXiv180207782 Cs Kingston J (2018) Artificial intelligence and legal liability. ArXiv180207782 Cs
Metadata
Title
Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
Authors
J. Raymond Geis
Adrian Brady
Carol C. Wu
Jack Spencer
Erik Ranschaert
Jacob L. Jaremko
Steve G. Langer
Andrea Borondy Kitts
Judy Birch
William F. Shields
Robert van den Hoven van Genderen
Elmar Kotter
Judy Wawira Gichoya
Tessa S. Cook
Matthew B. Morgan
An Tang
Nabile M. Safdar
Marc Kohli
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Insights into Imaging 1/2019 Go to the issue