Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published in: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

The effects of exergaming on balance, gait, technology acceptance and flow experience in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Jonathan Robinson, John Dixon, Alasdair Macsween, Paul van Schaik, Denis Martin

Published in: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Exergaming is a promising new alternative to traditional modes of therapeutic exercise which may be preferable and more effective for people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Impaired balance is reported as one of the most disabling aspects of MS. The purposes of this study were to examine the effects of exergaming on: (1) postural sway, (2) gait, (3) technology acceptance and (4) flow experience in people with MS. Secondary outcomes were disability: 12‐item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) questionnaire.

Methods

Fifty-six adults (mean age = 52 years, SD = 5.8; 38 women) with a clinical diagnosis of MS and able to walk 100 meters with or without use of a walking aid were included in this study and randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 received balance training using the Nintendo Wii Fit™ (exergaming) and Group 2 undertook traditional balance training (non-exergaming). Group 3 acted as a control group, receiving no intervention. Exergaming and traditional balance training groups received four weeks of twice weekly balance-orientated exercise. Postural sway was measured using a Kistler™ force platform. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait were measured using a GAITRite™ computerised walkway. Technology acceptance and flow experience were measured using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and the Flow State Scale questionnaires, respectively.

Results

There were significant improvements in bipedal postural sway in both intervention groups when compared to the control group; and no effects of either intervention on gait. There were no significant differences between the interventions in technology acceptance but on several dimensions of flow experience the Wii Fit™ was superior to traditional balance training. Both interventions showed improvements in disability compared to control.

Conclusions

In terms of the physical effects of exergaming, the Wii Fit™ is comparable to traditional balance training. These findings would support the use of the Wii Fit™ as an effective means of balance and gait training for people with MS, which is both accepted and intrinsically motivating to MS users.

Trial registration

Controlled Trials ISRCTN13924231.
Literature
1.
Sloka JS, Pryse-Phillips WEM, Stefanelli M. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Newfoundland and Labrador. Can J Neurol Sci. 2005;32:37–42.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Matsuda PN, Shumway-Cook A, Ciol MA, Bombardier CH, Kartin DA. Understanding falls in multiple sclerosis: association of mobility status, concerns about falling, and accumulated impairments. Phys Ther. 2012;92:407–15.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Scheinberg L, Holland N, Larocca N, Laitin P, Bennett A, Hall H. Multiple sclerosis; earning a living. N Y State J Med. 1980;80:1395–400.PubMed
4.
Stokes M. Physical management in neurological rehabilitation. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2004.
5.
Langdon DW, Thompson AJ. Multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study of selected variables affecting rehabilitation outcome. Mult Scler. 1999;5:94–100.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Martyn C. Symptoms and signs in the course of disease. In: McAlpine’s Mult Scler. 4th ed. Oxford, England: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 287–346.
7.
8.
Bateni H. Changes in balance in older adults based on use of physical therapy vs the Wii Fit gaming system: a preliminary study. Physiotherapy. 2012;98:211–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Brumels KKA, Blasius T, Cortright T, Oumedian D, Solberg B. Comparison of efficacy between traditional and video game based balance programs. Clin Kinesiol. 2008;62:26–31.
10.
Nitz JC, Kuys S, Isles R, Fu S. Is the Wii FitTM a new-generation tool for improving balance, health and well-being? A pilot study. Climacteric. 2010;13:487–91.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Kim JH, Jang SH, Kim CS, Jung JH, You JH. Use of virtual reality to enhance balance and ambulation in chronic stroke: a double-blind, randomized controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88:693–701.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Deutsch JE, Borbely M, Filler J, Huhn K, Guarrera-Bowlby P. Use of a low-cost, commercially available gaming console (Wii) for rehabilitation of an adolescent with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2008;88:1196–207.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Esculier J-F, Vaudrin J, Bériault P, Gagnon K, Tremblay LE. Home-based balance training programme using Wii Fit with balance board for Parkinsons’s disease: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:144–50.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Prosperini L, Fortuna D, Giannì C, Leonardi L, Marchetti MR, Pozzilli C. Home-based balance training using the Wii balance board a randomized, crossover pilot study in multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:516–25.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Nilsagård YE, Forsberg AS, von Koch L. Balance exercise for persons with multiple sclerosis using Wii games: a randomised, controlled multi-centre study. Mult Scler J. 2013;19:209–16.CrossRef
16.
Brichetto G, Spallarossa P, de Carvalho MLL, Battaglia MA. The effect of Nintendo® Wii® on balance in people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized control study. Mult Scler J. 2013;19:1219–21.CrossRef
17.
18.
Warburton DER, Bredin SSD, Horita LTL, Zbogar D, Scott JM, Esch BTA, et al. The health benefits of interactive video game exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32:655–63.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Rhodes RE, Warburton D, Coble J. Effect of interactive video bikes on exercise adherence and social cognitive expectancies in young men: A pilot study. In: Ann Behav Med, vol. Volume 35. 233 Spring St, New York, NY 10013 USA: Springer; 2008. p. S62–2.
20.
Warburton DER, McKenzie DC, Haykowsky MJ, Taylor A, Shoemaker P, Ignaszewski AP, et al. Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training for the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1080–4.CrossRefPubMed
21.
De Bourdeaudhuij I, Crombez G, Deforche B, Vinaimont F, Debode P, Bouckaert J. Effects of distraction on treadmill running time in severely obese children and adolescents. Int J Obes. 2002;26:1023–9.CrossRef
22.
Yamashita S, Iwai K, Akimoto T, Sugawara J, Kono I. Effects of music during exercise on RPE, heart rate and the autonomic nervous system. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006;46:425–30.PubMed
23.
Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manag Inf Syst Q. 2003;27:425–78.
24.
Jackson SA, Marsh H. Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1996;18:17–35.CrossRef
25.
Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33:1444.CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
Dalgas U, Stenager E, Ingemann-Hansen T. Multiple sclerosis and physical exercise: recommendations for the application of resistance-, endurance- and combined training. Mult Scler. 2008;14:35–53.CrossRefPubMed
28.
American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa; London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
29.
American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s exercise management for persons with chronic diseases and disabilities. 3rd ed. Leeds: Human Kinetics; 2009.
30.
31.
Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability The 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology. 2003;60:31–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Schulmann DL, Godfrey B, Fisher AG. Effect of eye movements on dynamic equilibrium. Phys Ther. 1987;67:1054–7.PubMed
34.
Rome K, Brown CL. Randomized clinical trial into the impact of rigid foot orthoses on balance parameters in excessively pronated feet. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:624–30.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Givon U, Zeilig G, Achiron A. Gait analysis in multiple sclerosis: characterization of temporal–spatial parameters using GAITRite functional ambulation system. Gait Posture. 2009;29:138–42.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Jackson S, Eklund R. Assessing flow in physical activity: the flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2002;24:133–50.CrossRef
37.
Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. London: Harper Perennial; 1990.
38.
Motl RW, Snook EM. Confirmation and extension of the validity of the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12). J Neurol Sci. 2008;268:69–73.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Raymakers JA, Samson MM, Verhaar HJJ. The assessment of body sway and the choice of the stability parameter(s). Gait Posture. 2005;21:48–58.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Heritier SR, Gebski VJ, Keech AC. Inclusion of patients in clinical trial analysis: the intention-to-treat principle. Med J Aust. 2003;179:438–40.PubMed
41.
Montedori A, Bonacini MI, Casazza G, Luchetta ML, Duca P, Cozzolino F, et al. Modified versus standard intention-to-treat reporting: Are there differences in methodological quality, sponsorship, and findings in randomized trials? A cross-sectional study. Trials. 2011;12:58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Allison PD. Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. In SAS® Glob Forum 2012 Conf SAS Inst (Paper 312–2012). Cary, NC; 2012.
43.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press; 1988.
44.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Shafizadeh M, Abolfazli R, Platt GK. Effect of visual force biofeedback on balance control in people with Multiple Sclerosis-a Pilot Quasi-experimental study. J Phys Ther. 2012;6:21–7.
46.
Cameron MMH, Lord S. Postural control in multiple sclerosis: implications for fall prevention. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2010;10:407–12.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Porosińska A, Pierzchała K, Mentel M, Karpe J. Evaluation of postural balance control in patients with multiple sclerosis–effect of different sensory conditions and arithmetic task execution. A pilot study. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2010;44:35–42.PubMed
48.
49.
Kato PM. Video games in health care: closing the gap. Rev Gen Psychol. 2010;14:113.CrossRef
50.
Andrews G, Kemp A, Sunderland M, Von Korff M, Ustun TB. Normative data for the 12 item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. PLoS One. 2009;4, e8343.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Prosperini L, Pozzilli C. The clinical relevance of force platform measures in multiple sclerosis: a review. Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:756564.PubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Jones MG. Creating electronic learning environments: games, flow, and the user interface. In: Proc Sel Res Dev Present Natl Conv Assoc Educ Commun Technol. St. Louis, MO: ERIC; 1998.
53.
Middleton A. Chronic low back pain: patient compliance with physiotherapy advice and exercise, perceived barriers and motivation. Phys Ther Rev. 2004;9:153–60.CrossRef
54.
Campbell R, Evans M, Tucker M, Quilty B, Dieppe P, Donovan JL. Why don’t patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:132–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Thin AG, Hansen L, McEachen D. Flow experience and mood states while playing body movement-controlled video games. Games Cult. 2011;6:414–28.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effects of exergaming on balance, gait, technology acceptance and flow experience in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Jonathan Robinson
John Dixon
Alasdair Macsween
Paul van Schaik
Denis Martin
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2052-1847
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-015-0001-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Is a threshold-based model a superior method to the relative percent concept for establishing individual exercise intensity? a randomized controlled trial

Research article

Validity of treadmill- and track-based individual calibration methods for estimating free-living walking speed and VO2 using the Actigraph accelerometer

Erratum

Erratum to: Smartphone apps for orthopaedic sports medicine – a smart move?

Research article

Effects of a home-exercise therapy programme on cervical and lumbar range of motion among nurses with neck and lower back pain: a quasi-experimental study

Research article

Mean amplitude deviation calculated from raw acceleration data: a novel method for classifying the intensity of adolescents’ physical activity irrespective of accelerometer brand

Research article

A description of the volume and intensity of sporadic physical activity among adults