Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Research

Recruitment and retention of mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children in a social media-delivered healthy eating intervention: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Audrée-Anne Dumas, Simone Lemieux, Annie Lapointe, Véronique Provencher, Julie Robitaille, Sophie Desroches

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Social media represent cost-effective platforms to advance the dissemination and uptake of health research to improve population health. However, there is limited evidence available to support researchers overcome methodological challenges related to recruitment and retention of participants in studies using social media for delivering behavior change interventions. This study aims to describe the recruitment and the retention strategies used in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated a blog-delivered healthy eating intervention among mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children.

Methods

Eighty-four adult mothers of children aged between two and 12 years old living in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, were recruited between October 2015 and February 2017 using traditional methods (e.g. institutional email lists, flyers, newspapers, and word of mouth) and Facebook advertisements. Retention rates were calculated at the end of the 6-month intervention and at a 12-month follow-up assessment. Sociodemographic characteristics, Internet use behaviors and retention rates of mothers recruited through traditional methods and Facebook were compared using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and Fisher exact tests.

Results

Of the 196 mothers who responded to the recruitment call, 87 (44.4%) were eligible and 84 (42.9%) were randomized to the trial, representing a recruitment success of 76.4% (84/110) from the planned sample size target. Among those, a minority (3.6%) were recruited using Facebook. Those mothers presented similar sociodemographic characteristics to those recruited using traditional methods. Retention rates were 73.8% and 66.7% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, with similar rates between mothers recruited using Facebook and traditional methods. Various challenges associated with population retention were highlighted with lack of time being mothers’ main reason for withdrawing from the study.

Conclusions

The methodological challenges experienced during the conduct of the blog-delivered healthy eating intervention allowed to draw upon several lessons regarding the recruitment process and the retention of mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children to inform future social media-delivered research. Recommendations for future research include exploring mothers’ perceptions and preferences to tailor social media recruitment, ensure that interventions are delivered to them using social media platforms that are already integrated into their routine, and are providing remote outcome assessments to increase participant retention.

Trial registration

Clinical Trial Protocol NCT03156803. Registered on 17 May 2017, retrospectively registered.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
4.
Antheunis ML, Tates K, Nieboer TE. Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(3):426–31.PubMed
5.
Rolls K, Hansen M, Jackson D, Elliott D. How health care professionals use social media to create virtual communities: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(6):e166.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P T. 2014;39(7):491–520.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Tobey LN, Koenig HF, Brown NA, Manore MM. Reaching low-income mothers to improve family fruit and vegetable intake: food hero social marketing campaign—research steps, development and testing. Nutrients. 2016;8(9):562.PubMedCentral
8.
Tobey LN, Manore MM. Social media and nutrition education: the food hero experience. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(2):128–33.PubMed
9.
Sullivan D, Goetz J, Gibson C, Washburn R, Smith B, Lee J, et al. Improving weight maintenance using virtual reality (Second Life). J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013;45(3):264–8.PubMed
10.
Jane M, Hagger M, Foster J, Ho S, Kane R, Pal S. Effects of a weight management program delivered by social media on weight and metabolic syndrome risk factors in overweight and obese adults: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178326.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Caplette ME, Provencher V, Bissonnette-Maheux V, Dugrenier M, Lapointe A, Gagnon MP, et al. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through a healthy eating blog: a feasibility study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(4):e59.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Thornton L, Batterham PJ, Fassnacht DB, Kay-Lambkin F, Calear AL, Hunt S. Recruiting for health, medical or psychosocial research using Facebook: systematic review. Internet Interv. 2016;4:72–81.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Topolovec-Vranic J, Natarajan K. The use of social media in recruitment for medical research studies: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(11):e286.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Whitaker C, Stevelink S, Fear N. The use of Facebook in recruiting participants for health research purposes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(8):e290.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
King DB, O'Rourke N, DeLongis A. Social media recruitment and online data collection: a beginner’s guide and best practices for accessing low-prevalence and hard-to-reach populations. Can Psychol. 2014;55(4):240–9.
16.
Dumas AA, Lapointe A, Desroches S. Users, uses, and effects of social media in dietetic practice: scoping review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(2):e55.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Elaheebocus S, Weal M, Morrison L, Yardley L. Peer-based social media features in behavior change interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(2):e20.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Burgess JD, Kimble RM, Watt K, Cameron CM. The adoption of social media to recruit participants for the Cool Runnings randomized controlled trial in Australia. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(10):e200.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Kernot J, Olds T, Lewis LK, Maher C. Usability testing and piloting of the Mums Step It Up program--a team-based social networking physical activity intervention for women with young children. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e108842.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Laws RA, Litterbach EK, Denney-Wilson EA, Russell CG, Taki S, Ong KL, et al. A comparison of recruitment methods for an mHealth intervention targeting mothers: lessons from the growing healthy program. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(9):e248.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
22.
23.
Durao C, Severo M, Oliveira A, Moreira P, Guerra A, Barros H, et al. Association of maternal characteristics and behaviours with 4-year-old children’s dietary patterns. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13(2):e12278.
24.
Gibson EL, Wardle J, Watts CJ. Fruit and vegetable consumption, nutritional knowledge and beliefs in mothers and children. Appetite. 1998;31(2):205–28.PubMed
25.
Best JR, Goldschmidt AB, Mockus-Valenzuela DS, Stein RI, Epstein LH, Wilfley DE. Shared weight and dietary changes in parent-child dyads following family-based obesity treatment. Health Psychol. 2016;35(1):92–5.PubMed
26.
Birch LL, Fisher JO. Mothers’ child-feeding practices influence daughters’ eating and weight. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(5):1054–61.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Shloim N, Edelson LR, Martin N, Hetherington MM. Parenting styles, feeding styles, feeding practices, and weight status in 4-12 year-old children: a systematic review of the literature. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1849.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Petersen A, Tanner C, Fraser S. Practicing food anxiety: making Australian mothers responsible for their families’ dietary decisions. Food Foodways. 2014;22(3):175–97.
29.
Hartman MA, Hosper K, Stronks K. Targeting physical activity and nutrition interventions towards mothers with young children: a review on components that contribute to attendance and effectiveness. Public Health Nutr. 2010;14(8):1364–81.PubMed
30.
Fiks AG, Gruver RS, Bishop-Gilyard CT, Shults J, Virudachalam S, Suh AW, et al. A social media peer group for mothers to prevent obesity from infancy: the Grow2Gether randomized trial. Child Obes. 2017;13(5):356–68.PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Gruver RS, Bishop-Gilyard CT, Lieberman A, Gerdes M, Virudachalam S, Suh AW, et al. A social media peer group intervention for mothers to prevent obesity and promote healthy growth from infancy: development and pilot trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(3):e159.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Horodynski MA, Silk K, Hsieh G, Hoffman A, Robson M. Tools for teen moms to reduce infant obesity: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:22.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Herring SJ, Cruice JF, Bennett GG, Davey A, Foster GD. Using technology to promote postpartum weight loss in urban, low-income mothers: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(6):610–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Silfee VJ, Lopez-Cepero A, Lemon SC, Estabrook B, Nguyen O, Rosal MC. Recruiting low-income postpartum women into two weight loss interventions: in-person versus Facebook delivery. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9(1):129–34.PubMed
35.
Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1887–92.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Walters SJ, Bonacho Dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby I, Bortolami O, Flight L, Hind D, Jacques RM, et al. Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme. BMJ Open. 2017;7(3):e015276.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Sully BG, Julious SA, Nicholl J. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2013;14:166.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Dumas A-A, Lemieux S, Lapointe A, Provencher V, Robitaille J, Desroches S. Development of an evidence-informed blog to promote healthy eating among mothers: use of the intervention mapping protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(5):e92.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Dumas A-A, Lemieux S, Lapointe A, Provencher V, Robitaille J, Desroches S. Effects of an evidence-informed healthy eating blog on dietary intakes and food-related behaviors of mothers of preschool- and school-aged children: a randomized controlled trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019; In press.
40.
41.
42.
Harvey A-A, Panahi S, Provencher V, Drapeau V, editors. Nutriathlon: The impact of a family nutrition intervention on eating habits. International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Annual Meeting; 2017 June 5; Victoria: International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 2017.
43.
Lanza E, Schatzkin A, Daston C, Corle D, Freedman L, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Implementation of a 4-y, high-fiber, high-fruit-and-vegetable, low-fat dietary intervention: results of dietary changes in the Polyp Prevention Trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74(3):387–401.PubMed
44.
Bissonnette-Maheux V, Dumas AA, Provencher V, Lapointe A, Dugrenier M, Straus S, et al. Women’s perceptions of usefulness and ease of use of four healthy eating blog characteristics: a qualitative study of 33 French-Canadian women. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(7):1220–7.e3.PubMed
45.
Bissonnette-Maheux V, Provencher V, Lapointe A, Dugrenier M, Dumas AA, Pluye P, et al. Exploring women’s beliefs and perceptions about healthy eating blogs: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e87.PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
47.
Menozzi D, Sogari G, Mora C. Explaining vegetable consumption among young adults: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Nutrients. 2015;7(9):7633–50.PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Mackenbach JD, Brage S, Forouhi NG, Griffin SJ, Wareham NJ, Monsivais P. Does the importance of dietary costs for fruit and vegetable intake vary by socioeconomic position? Br J Nutr. 2015;114(9):1464–70.PubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Hardcastle SJ, Blake N. Influences underlying family food choices in mothers from an economically disadvantaged community. Eat Behav. 2016;20:1–8.PubMed
50.
Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Peters GY, Mullen PD, Parcel GS, Ruiter RA, et al. A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an intervention mapping approach. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(3):297-312.
51.
Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95.PubMed
52.
Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, Brug J, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e2.PubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Lohman T, Roche A, Artorel R. The Airlie (VA) Consensus Conference: Standardization of Anthropometric Measurements. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1998. p. 39–80.
54.
55.
Cote M, Lapointe A, Laramee C, Lemieux S, Desroches S, Belanger-Gravel A, et al. Beliefs related to participation in a large web-based prospective survey on diet and health among individuals with a low socioeconomic status: qualitative study. JMIR Form Res. 2019;3(4):e13854.PubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Bourget C, Lacombe M-È. Portrait numérique des foyers québécois. NETendances. 2017;8(1):1-26.
57.
Bourget C, Gosselin G. L’usage des médias sociaux au Québec. NETendances. 2018;9(5):1-18.
58.
Silfee VJ, Lopez-Cepero A, Lemon SC, Estabrook B, Nguyen O, Rosal MC. Recruiting low-income postpartum women into two weight loss interventions: in-person versus Facebook delivery. Transl Behav Med. 2018;9(1):129–34. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​tbm/​iby013.
59.
Chang MW, Nitzke S, Brown R, Egan MJB, Bendekgey CM, Buist D. Recruitment challenges and enrollment observations from a community based intervention (mothers in motion) for low-income overweight and obese women. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017;5:26–33.PubMed
60.
van der Zande ISE, van der Graaf R, Hooft L, van Delden JJM. Facilitators and barriers to pregnant women’s participation in research: a systematic review. Women Birth. 2018;31(5):350–61.PubMed
61.
Michie S, Yardley L, West R, Patrick K, Greaves F. Developing and evaluating digital interventions to promote behavior change in health and health care: recommendations resulting from an international workshop. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e232.PubMedPubMedCentral
62.
Ross KM, Wing RR. Concordance of in-home ‘smart’ scale measurement with body weight measured in-person. Obes Sci Pract. 2016;2(2):224–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
63.
Khatri C, Chapman SJ, Glasbey J, Kelly M, Nepogodiev D, Bhangu A, et al. Social media and internet driven study recruitment: evaluating a new model for promoting collaborator engagement and participation. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118899.PubMedPubMedCentral
64.
Ramo DE, Rodriguez TM, Chavez K, Sommer MJ, Prochaska JJ. Facebook recruitment of young adult smokers for a cessation trial: methods, metrics, and lessons learned. Internet Interv. 2014;1(2):58–64.PubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Shere M, Zhao XY, Koren G. The role of social media in recruiting for clinical trials in pregnancy. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92744.PubMedPubMedCentral
66.
Quach S, Pereira JA, Russell ML, Wormsbecker AE, Ramsay H, Crowe L, et al. The good, bad, and ugly of online recruitment of parents for health-related focus groups: lessons learned. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e250.PubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Arigo D, Pagoto S, Carter-Harris L, Lillie SE, Nebeker C. Using social media for health research: methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery. Digit Health. 2018;4:2055207618771757.PubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Partridge SR, Balestracci K, Wong AT, Hebden L, McGeechan K, Denney-Wilson E, et al. Effective strategies to recruit young adults into the TXT2BFiT mHealth randomized controlled trial for weight gain prevention. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(2):e66.PubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Waring ME, Moore Simas TA, Oleski J, Xiao RS, Mulcahy JA, May CN, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of delivering a postpartum weight loss intervention via Facebook: a pilot study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018;50(1):70–4.e1.PubMedPubMedCentral
70.
Bower P, Brueton V, Gamble C, Treweek S, Smith CT, Young B, et al. Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities. Trials. 2014;15:399.PubMedPubMedCentral
71.
Daniels LA, Wilson JL, Mallan KM, Mihrshahi S, Perry R, Nicholson JM, et al. Recruiting and engaging new mothers in nutrition research studies: lessons from the Australian NOURISH randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:129.PubMedPubMedCentral
72.
73.
Clarke M, Savage G, Maguire L, McAneney H. The SWAT (study within a trial) programme; embedding trials to improve the methodological design and conduct of future research. Trials. 2015;16(2):P209.PubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Recruitment and retention of mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children in a social media-delivered healthy eating intervention: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Audrée-Anne Dumas
Simone Lemieux
Annie Lapointe
Véronique Provencher
Julie Robitaille
Sophie Desroches
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04628-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Trials 1/2020 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Effects of Keluoxin capsule combined with losartan potassium on diabetic kidney disease: study protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial

Study protocol

Peer support for people with severe mental illness versus usual care in high-, middle- and low-income countries: study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (UPSIDES-RCT)

Study protocol

Comparison of the clinical benefits for non-small cell lung cancer patients between different volume of pleural lavage fluid following video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Correction

Correction to: A nurse-led health coaching intervention for stroke survivors and their family caregivers in hospital to home transition care in Chongqing, China: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Effects of sang-qi granules on blood pressure and endothelial dysfunction in stage I or II hypertension: study protocol for a randomized double-blind double-simulation controlled trial

Letter

Ivermectin to prevent hospitalizations in patients with COVID-19 (IVERCOR-COVID19): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial