Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Laparotomy | Study protocol

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques Of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial

Authors: Mohamad Hadi El Charif, Zeina Hassan, Jamal Hoballah, Mohamad Khalife, Eman Sbaity

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Wound complications following midline laparotomies are common and the main source of postoperative morbidity including superficial or deep wound infection, skin dehiscence, fascia dehiscence, and incisional hernia. Abdominal closure complications are strongly associated with suture technique and material, in addition to other factors related to the patient and type of surgery performed. The traditional technique is to place the fascia sutures 1 cm apart and at least 1 cm away from the fascia edge. A Swedish study described a new technique of placing the sutures 5 mm apart and 5 mm away from the fascia edge, resulting in lower rates of abdominal wound complications. This study has a number of limitations. There is a need for improved quality evidence to convince the surgical community to change the closure technique of abdominal wounds aiming to reduce morbidity, which is exemplified in incisional hernias and other various postop complications.

Methods

This is a 1:1 randomized, controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded, parallel design, superiority trial, with a primary endpoint of incisional hernia at 1 year. The study will be conducted at AUBMC over a 3-year period. Patients planned for a non-emergent midline laparotomy for general surgery or vascular procedure will be randomized to either fascia closure technique. In order to detect a drop of 12% in the incidence of incisional hernia, with 80% power and an alpha of 0.05, we will need to recruit 114 patients per arm. After adjusting for loss to follow-up, target recruitment is 274 subjects. We will compare both arms for the primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes, using chi-square or t test as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression will be done.

Discussion

This trial will assess postop complications following abdominal midline wound closures via two different suturing techniques. This trial will generate evidence-based conclusions that will allow surgeons to assess the role of a new abdominal closure technique in decreasing short- and long-term postoperative complications, for a commonly performed procedure.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03527433. Registered on 17 May 2018 before starting participant enrollment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leaper DJ, van Goor H, Reilly J, Petrosillo N, Geiss HK, Torres AJ, et al. Surgical site infection - a European perspective of incidence and economic burden. Int Wound J. 2004;1(4):247–73.CrossRef Leaper DJ, van Goor H, Reilly J, Petrosillo N, Geiss HK, Torres AJ, et al. Surgical site infection - a European perspective of incidence and economic burden. Int Wound J. 2004;1(4):247–73.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, Henderson M, Fahey T, Rege RV, et al. Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg. 2000;24(1):95–100 discussion 1.CrossRef Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, Henderson M, Fahey T, Rege RV, et al. Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg. 2000;24(1):95–100 discussion 1.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284(6320):931–3.CrossRef Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284(6320):931–3.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Manninen MJ, Lavonius M, Perhoniemi VJ. Results of incisional hernia repair. A retrospective study of 172 unselected hernioplasties. Eur J Surg. 1991;157(1):29–31.PubMed Manninen MJ, Lavonius M, Perhoniemi VJ. Results of incisional hernia repair. A retrospective study of 172 unselected hernioplasties. Eur J Surg. 1991;157(1):29–31.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Paul A, Korenkov M, Peters S, Kohler L, Fischer S, Troidl H. Unacceptable results of the Mayo procedure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias. Eur J Surg. 1998;164(5):361–7.CrossRef Paul A, Korenkov M, Peters S, Kohler L, Fischer S, Troidl H. Unacceptable results of the Mayo procedure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias. Eur J Surg. 1998;164(5):361–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Read RC, Yoder G. Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg. 1989;124(4):485–8.CrossRef Read RC, Yoder G. Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg. 1989;124(4):485–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference van’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg. 2002;89(11):1350–6.CrossRef van’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg. 2002;89(11):1350–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wissing J, van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME, Veen HF, Ponsen RJ, Jeekel J. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1987;74(8):738–41.CrossRef Wissing J, van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME, Veen HF, Ponsen RJ, Jeekel J. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1987;74(8):738–41.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rahbari NN, Knebel P, Diener MK, Seidlmayer C, Ridwelski K, Stoltzing H, et al. Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery - is there any consensus? BMC Surg. 2009;9:8.CrossRef Rahbari NN, Knebel P, Diener MK, Seidlmayer C, Ridwelski K, Stoltzing H, et al. Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery - is there any consensus? BMC Surg. 2009;9:8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):843–56.CrossRef Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):843–56.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cornish J, Harries RL, Bosanquet D, Rees B, Ansell J, Frewer N, et al. Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART) - abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):454.CrossRef Cornish J, Harries RL, Bosanquet D, Rees B, Ansell J, Frewer N, et al. Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART) - abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):454.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J, et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1254–60.CrossRef Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J, et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1254–60.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1056–9.CrossRef Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1056–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(4):407–14.CrossRef Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(4):407–14.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference McCaffery M, McCaffery M, Pasero C. Pain: clinical manual, vol. xix. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 795. McCaffery M, McCaffery M, Pasero C. Pain: clinical manual, vol. xix. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 795.
16.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRef Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hope WW, Waheed A, Tuma F. Incisional hernia. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2020. Hope WW, Waheed A, Tuma F. Incisional hernia. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2020.
18.
go back to reference Kroese LF, Sneiders D, Kleinrensink GJ, Muysoms F, Lange JF. Comparing different modalities for the diagnosis of incisional hernia: a systematic review. Hernia. 2018;22(2):229–42.CrossRef Kroese LF, Sneiders D, Kleinrensink GJ, Muysoms F, Lange JF. Comparing different modalities for the diagnosis of incisional hernia: a systematic review. Hernia. 2018;22(2):229–42.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hojer AM, Rygaard H, Jess P. CT in the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol. 1997;7(9):1416–8.CrossRef Hojer AM, Rygaard H, Jess P. CT in the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol. 1997;7(9):1416–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gutierrez de la Pena C, Vargas Romero J, Dieguez Garcia JA. The value of CT diagnosis of hernia recurrence after prosthetic repair of ventral incisional hernias. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(7):1161–4.CrossRef Gutierrez de la Pena C, Vargas Romero J, Dieguez Garcia JA. The value of CT diagnosis of hernia recurrence after prosthetic repair of ventral incisional hernias. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(7):1161–4.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Baucom RB, Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, Poulose BK. Prospective evaluation of surgeon physical examination for detection of incisional hernias. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):363–6.CrossRef Baucom RB, Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, Poulose BK. Prospective evaluation of surgeon physical examination for detection of incisional hernias. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):363–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Holihan JL, Karanjawala B, Ko A, Askenasy EP, Matta EJ, Gharbaoui L, et al. Use of computed tomography in diagnosing ventral hernia recurrence: a blinded, prospective, multispecialty evaluation. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(1):7–13.CrossRef Holihan JL, Karanjawala B, Ko A, Askenasy EP, Matta EJ, Gharbaoui L, et al. Use of computed tomography in diagnosing ventral hernia recurrence: a blinded, prospective, multispecialty evaluation. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(1):7–13.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bloemen A, van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, Hoofwijk AG. Comparison of ultrasonography and physical examination in the diagnosis of incisional hernia in a prospective study. Hernia. 2012;16(1):53–7.CrossRef Bloemen A, van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, Hoofwijk AG. Comparison of ultrasonography and physical examination in the diagnosis of incisional hernia in a prospective study. Hernia. 2012;16(1):53–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, Dupont WD, Poulose BK. Comparative effectiveness of dynamic abdominal sonography for hernia vs computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernia. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):447–53 quiz 510-1.CrossRef Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, Dupont WD, Poulose BK. Comparative effectiveness of dynamic abdominal sonography for hernia vs computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernia. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):447–53 quiz 510-1.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference den Hartog D, Dur AH, Kamphuis AG, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW. Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(1):45–8.CrossRef den Hartog D, Dur AH, Kamphuis AG, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW. Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(1):45–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Baucom RB, Ousley J, Feurer ID, Beveridge GB, Pierce RA, Holzman MD, et al. Patient reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair-establishing the ventral hernia recurrence inventory. Am J Surg. 2016;212(1):81–8.CrossRef Baucom RB, Ousley J, Feurer ID, Beveridge GB, Pierce RA, Holzman MD, et al. Patient reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair-establishing the ventral hernia recurrence inventory. Am J Surg. 2016;212(1):81–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference van Veenendaal N, Poelman MM, van den Heuvel B, Dwars BJ, Schreurs WH, Stoot J, et al. The PINCH-Phone: a new screenings method for recurrent incisional hernias. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(9):2794–801.CrossRef van Veenendaal N, Poelman MM, van den Heuvel B, Dwars BJ, Schreurs WH, Stoot J, et al. The PINCH-Phone: a new screenings method for recurrent incisional hernias. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(9):2794–801.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques Of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial
Authors
Mohamad Hadi El Charif
Zeina Hassan
Jamal Hoballah
Mohamad Khalife
Eman Sbaity
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04507-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Trials 1/2020 Go to the issue